• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估面向公民的数字接触者追踪支持工具的附加价值:框架开发

Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.

作者信息

Baron Ruth, Hamdiui Nora, Helms Yannick B, Crutzen Rik, Götz Hannelore M, Stein Mart L

机构信息

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728.

DOI:10.2196/44728
PMID:38019583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10719815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed that with high infection rates, health services conducting contact tracing (CT) could become overburdened, leading to limited or incomplete CT. Digital CT support (DCTS) tools are designed to mimic traditional CT, by transferring a part of or all the tasks of CT into the hands of citizens. Besides saving time for health services, these tools may help to increase the number of contacts retrieved during the contact identification process, quantity and quality of contact details, and speed of the contact notification process. The added value of DCTS tools for CT is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To help determine whether DCTS tools could improve the effectiveness of CT, this study aims to develop a framework for the comprehensive assessment of these tools.

METHODS

A framework containing evaluation topics, research questions, accompanying study designs, and methods was developed based on consultations with CT experts from municipal public health services and national public health authorities, complemented with scientific literature.

RESULTS

These efforts resulted in a framework aiming to assist with the assessment of the following aspects of CT: speed; comprehensiveness; effectiveness with regard to contact notification; positive case detection; potential workload reduction of public health professionals; demographics related to adoption and reach; and user experiences of public health professionals, index cases, and contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

This framework provides guidance for researchers and policy makers in designing their own evaluation studies, the findings of which can help determine how and the extent to which DCTS tools should be implemented as a CT strategy for future infectious disease outbreaks.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情表明,在感染率较高的情况下,开展接触者追踪(CT)的卫生服务可能不堪重负,导致接触者追踪受限或不完整。数字接触者追踪支持(DCTS)工具旨在通过将部分或全部接触者追踪任务交给公民,来模拟传统的接触者追踪。除了为卫生服务节省时间外,这些工具可能有助于增加在接触者识别过程中找回的接触者数量、接触者详细信息的数量和质量,以及接触者通知过程的速度。DCTS工具对接触者追踪的附加价值目前尚不清楚。

目的

为帮助确定DCTS工具是否能提高接触者追踪的有效性,本研究旨在开发一个全面评估这些工具的框架。

方法

基于与市公共卫生服务机构和国家公共卫生当局的接触者追踪专家的磋商,并辅以科学文献,开发了一个包含评估主题、研究问题、配套研究设计和方法的框架。

结果

这些努力产生了一个框架,旨在协助评估接触者追踪的以下方面:速度;全面性;接触者通知的有效性;阳性病例检测;公共卫生专业人员潜在工作量的减少;与采用和覆盖范围相关的人口统计学;以及公共卫生专业人员、索引病例和接触者的用户体验。

结论

该框架为研究人员和政策制定者设计自己的评估研究提供了指导,研究结果有助于确定应如何以及在何种程度上实施DCTS工具作为未来传染病爆发的接触者追踪策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09cd/10719815/faf2f8ab96b3/resprot_v12i1e44728_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09cd/10719815/faf2f8ab96b3/resprot_v12i1e44728_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09cd/10719815/faf2f8ab96b3/resprot_v12i1e44728_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.评估面向公民的数字接触者追踪支持工具的附加价值:框架开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728.
2
Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing through digital support tools: an exploratory qualitative study.荷兰公共卫生专业人员对通过数字支持工具让公民参与新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法和需求:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08764-y.
3
Determinants of Dutch public health professionals' intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study.荷兰公共卫生专业人员使用数字接触者追踪支持工具意向的影响因素:一项横断面在线问卷调查研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;3(2):e0000425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000425. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.公民参与使用数字工具进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪:一项探索公民观点和需求的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x.
5
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study.美国数字接触者追踪移动健康工具的上市后评估模型的调整和利用:观察性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 22;9:e38633. doi: 10.2196/38633.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The Dutch COVID-19 Notification App: Lessons Learned From a Mixed Methods Evaluation Among End Users and Contact-Tracing Employees.荷兰新冠疫情通知应用程序:终端用户和接触者追踪工作人员混合方法评估的经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 4;6(11):e38904. doi: 10.2196/38904.
8
Fantastic perspectives and where to find them: involving patients and citizens in digital health research.奇妙的前景以及如何找到它们:让患者和公众参与数字健康研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 2;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00374-6.
9
Using Digital Tools for Contact Tracing to Improve COVID-19 Safety in Schools: Qualitative Study Exploring Views and Experiences Among School Staff.使用数字工具进行接触者追踪以提高学校的COVID-19安全性:一项探索学校工作人员观点和经验的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 1;6(11):e36412. doi: 10.2196/36412.
10
The Dutch COVID-19 Contact Tracing App (the CoronaMelder): Usability Study.荷兰新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序(CoronaMelder):可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 26;5(3):e27882. doi: 10.2196/27882.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease History, Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics for Human Monkeypox Disease: A Comprehensive Review.人类猴痘疾病的病史、发病机制、诊断与治疗:全面综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 7;10(12):2091. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122091.
2
What can we learn from HIV, COVID-19 and mpox stigma to guide stigma-informed pandemic preparedness?我们可以从艾滋病毒、新冠病毒和猴痘的污名化现象中学到什么,以指导基于污名认知的大流行防范工作?
J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Dec;25(12):e26042. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26042.
3
Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing through digital support tools: an exploratory qualitative study.
荷兰公共卫生专业人员对通过数字支持工具让公民参与新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法和需求:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08764-y.
4
Incubation Period of COVID-19 Caused by Unique SARS-CoV-2 Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 株引起的 COVID-19 的潜伏期:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28008.
5
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.
6
The psychological impact of quarantine due to COVID-19: A systematic review of risk, protective factors and interventions using socio-ecological model framework.2019冠状病毒病疫情下隔离措施造成的心理影响:基于社会生态模型框架对风险、保护因素及干预措施的系统综述
Heliyon. 2022 Jun;8(6):e09765. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09765. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
7
Contact Tracing: Barriers and Facilitators.接触者追踪:障碍与促进因素。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jul;112(7):1025-1033. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306842. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
Monitoring Symptoms of COVID-19: Review of Mobile Apps.监测 COVID-19 症状:移动应用程序综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 1;10(6):e36065. doi: 10.2196/36065.
9
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Contact Tracing Applications: Systematic Review and Recommendations.影响接触者追踪应用程序采用的因素:系统评价与建议
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 3;4:862466. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862466. eCollection 2022.
10
Contact tracing indicators for COVID-19: Rapid scoping review and conceptual framework.新冠接触者追踪指标:快速范围界定综述和概念框架。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 28;17(2):e0264433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264433. eCollection 2022.