Department of Health Administration and Education, Faculty of Science Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, Faculty of Science Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Aug 25;45:185. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.185.39994. eCollection 2023.
the stress associated with hypertension treatment makes using coping strategies inevitable. However, most patients with hypertension apply inefficient coping strategies, leading to uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). The study analyzed coping strategies associated with hypertension treatment and determined how these coping strategies predicted the current BP of patients with hypertension.
the study was a prospective observational cohort conducted between January and December, 2020. Consecutive sampling technique was used to enumerate 508 patients who consistently sought treatment at the healthcare facilities. A sphygmomanometer was used to measure BP to determine controlled and uncontrolled BP based on Ghana Health Service standards. A questionnaire was adapted from Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations-2 to measure patients' coping strategies. Descriptive statistics, cut off percentage and multiple linear regression were applied in analyzing the data at a 0.05 level of significance.
females were two-thirds (74%) of the study population and the mean age was 58.40 ± 11.72. All patients with hypertension used the three coping strategies: emotion-oriented coping (EOC), task-oriented coping (TOC) and avoidance coping (AC). However, EOC was highly used (61.2%), followed by TOC (58.5%) and AC (46.2%). Also, the study found coping with treatment regimens to be relatively poor since it was only physical exercise (79.5%) that they effectively observed. The multiple linear regression results revealed that the three coping strategies were significant predictors of current BP levels [F (3, 117) = 12.390 at p < 0.001]. Thus, AC, TOC, and EOC explained 37.4% of the variability of current BP status (R2 adj=0.374). Specifically, patients who use TOC (66.3%) were more likely to have a controlled BP than those using EOC (53.7%) and AC (35.8%).
patients' coping strategies were inadequate for hypertension treatment since treatment regimens were poorly observed. Meanwhile, EOC is most likely to negatively affect a patient's treatment, leading to uncontrolled BP. Our study recommends the need to encourage patients to combine their EOC with TOC to enable them control their BP better.
与高血压治疗相关的压力使得使用应对策略成为必然。然而,大多数高血压患者采用的应对策略效率低下,导致血压控制不佳。本研究分析了与高血压治疗相关的应对策略,并确定这些应对策略如何预测高血压患者的当前血压。
本研究为 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间进行的前瞻性观察队列研究。采用连续抽样技术对在医疗机构持续治疗的 508 名患者进行计数。使用血压计测量血压,根据加纳卫生服务标准确定血压控制和未控制情况。采用应对压力情境问卷(Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations-2)来测量患者的应对策略。采用描述性统计、截断百分比和多元线性回归分析方法,在 0.05 水平上进行数据分析。
女性占研究人群的三分之二(74%),平均年龄为 58.40±11.72 岁。所有高血压患者均采用三种应对策略:情绪导向应对(EOC)、任务导向应对(TOC)和回避应对(AC)。然而,EOC 的使用率最高(61.2%),其次是 TOC(58.5%)和 AC(46.2%)。此外,研究发现患者对治疗方案的应对相对较差,因为他们仅能有效遵守运动锻炼方案(79.5%)。多元线性回归结果显示,三种应对策略是当前血压水平的显著预测因子[F(3,117)=12.390,p<0.001]。因此,AC、TOC 和 EOC 解释了当前血压状态变异性的 37.4%(R2 adj=0.374)。具体来说,使用 TOC(66.3%)的患者比使用 EOC(53.7%)和 AC(35.8%)的患者更有可能血压得到控制。
患者的应对策略不足以治疗高血压,因为他们对治疗方案的遵守情况较差。同时,EOC 很可能对患者的治疗产生负面影响,导致血压控制不佳。本研究建议需要鼓励患者将 EOC 与 TOC 结合使用,以帮助他们更好地控制血压。