Suppr超能文献

尼日利亚电子废物场户外灰尘和土壤中传统和替代卤代有机污染物的评估:浓度、分布模式及对人体暴露的影响。

Assessment of legacy and alternative halogenated organic pollutants in outdoor dust and soil from e-waste sites in Nigeria: Concentrations, patterns, and implications for human exposure.

机构信息

Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Chemistry, University of Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria; Chemistry Department, Chrisland University, Ogun State, 23409, Nigeria.

Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2024 Feb 1;342:123032. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123032. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

Abstract

E-waste is often processed informally, particularly in developing countries, resulting in the release of harmful chemicals into the environment. This study investigated the co-occurrence of selected persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including legacy and alternative halogenated flame retardants (10 polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), syn and anti-dechlorane plus (DP)), 32 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and 12 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), in 20 outdoor dust and 49 soil samples from 7 e-waste sites in Nigeria. This study provides the first report on alternative flame retardants (DBDPE and DP) in Nigeria. The total concentration range of the selected classes of compounds was in the order: ∑PBDEs (44-12300 ng/g) > DBDPE (4.9-3032 ng/g) > ∑DP (0.7-278 ng/g) > ∑PCBs (4.9-148 ng/g) > ∑OCPs (1.9-25 ng/g) for dust, and DBDPE (4.9-9647 ng/g) > ∑PBDEs (90.3-7548 ng/g) > ∑PCBs (6.1-5025 ng/g) > ∑OCPs (1.9-250 ng/g) > ∑DP (2.1-142 ng/g) for soil. PBDEs were the major contributors to POP pollution at e-waste dismantling sites, while PCBs were the most significant contributors at e-waste dumpsites. DBDPE was found to be significantly associated with pollution at both e-waste dismantling and dumpsites. Estimated daily intake (EDI) via dust and soil ingestion and dermal adsorption routes ranged from 1.3 to 2.8 ng/kg bw/day and 0.2-2.9 ng/kg bw/day, respectively. In the worst-case scenario, EDI ranged from 2.9 to 10 ng/kg bw/day and 0.8-5.8 ng/kg bw/day for dust and soil, respectively. The obtained intake levels posed no non-carcinogenic risk, but could increase the incidence of cancer at some of the studied e-waste sites, with values exceeding the USEPA cancer risk lower limit (1.0 × 10). Overall, our results suggest that e-waste sites act as emission point sources of POPs.

摘要

电子废物通常是在非正式的情况下进行处理的,特别是在发展中国家,这导致有害物质释放到环境中。本研究调查了选定的持久性有机污染物(POPs)的共现情况,包括传统和替代卤代阻燃剂(10 种多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)、十溴二苯乙烷(DBDPE)、顺式和反式-十氯二苯并对二恶英(DP))、32 种多氯联苯(PCBs)和 12 种有机氯农药(OCPs),在尼日利亚 7 个电子废物场的 20 个室外灰尘和 49 个土壤样本中进行了研究。本研究首次报告了尼日利亚的替代阻燃剂(DBDPE 和 DP)。所选化合物类别的总浓度范围如下:∑PBDEs(44-12300ng/g)> DBDPE(4.9-3032ng/g)>∑DP(0.7-278ng/g)>∑PCBs(4.9-148ng/g)>∑OCPs(1.9-25ng/g),灰尘,和 DBDPE(4.9-9647ng/g)>∑PBDEs(90.3-7548ng/g)>∑PCBs(6.1-5025ng/g)>∑OCPs(1.9-250ng/g)>∑DP(2.1-142ng/g),土壤。在电子废物拆解场,多溴二苯醚是 POP 污染的主要贡献者,而多氯联苯则是电子废物倾倒场最主要的贡献者。发现 DBDPE 与电子废物拆解和倾倒场的污染显著相关。通过灰尘和土壤摄入和皮肤吸附途径估计的每日摄入量(EDI)范围分别为 1.3 至 2.8ng/kg bw/day 和 0.2-2.9ng/kg bw/day。在最坏的情况下,灰尘和土壤的 EDI 范围分别为 2.9 至 10ng/kg bw/day 和 0.8-5.8ng/kg bw/day。所获得的摄入量不会造成非致癌风险,但在一些研究的电子废物场可能会增加癌症的发生率,其值超过美国环保署癌症风险下限(1.0×10)。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,电子废物场是 POPs 的排放点源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验