Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Jan 1;160(1):80-87. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4889.
Symptomatic oral lichen planus (OLP) can be challenging to treat.
To compare the efficacy of oral acitretin plus topical triamcinolone acetonide (TAC), 0.1%, with TAC monotherapy in patients with symptomatic OLP.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This monocentric, investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled, investigator- and patient-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2018 to June 2020 at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, a tertiary referral center in Chandigarh, India. Sixty-four patients 18 years or older with symptomatic OLP were recruited by consecutive sampling. Data were analyzed from July to December 2020.
The patients were randomized to receive either a combination of oral acitretin (25-35 mg/d) and TAC (treatment group) or TAC in combination with placebo (placebo group) for 28 weeks, with an additional 8 weeks of treatment-free follow-up after the end of treatment (36 weeks of total study duration).
The disease severity and treatment response were assessed using Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS), Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14), and visual analog scale (VAS). The primary aim was to assess the number of patients achieving ODSS-75 (75% reduction in ODSS compared with baseline) in both groups at 28 weeks and at the end of 36 weeks.
Among 64 patients, 31 in the treatment group and 30 in the placebo group completed the study (mean [SD] age, 50.6 [15.2] years vs 49.2 [14.4] years; male-female ratio, 13:19 vs 16:16). Baseline ODSS, visual analog scale, and Oral Health Impact Profile 14 scores were comparable in both groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a statistically significant higher number of patients achieving 75% or higher reduction in ODSS in the treatment group compared with the placebo group at the end of 28 weeks (28 [88%] vs 15 [47%], a 41 [95% CI, 20-61] percentage point difference between groups; P < .001; Cramér V = 0.47) and 36 weeks (27 [84%] vs 13 [41%], a 43 [95% CI, 23-67] percentage point difference between groups; P < .001; Cramér V = 0.47). Relapses during the posttreatment follow-up of 8 weeks were low among patients in both treatment and placebo groups (1 [3%] vs 2 [6%], a 3 [95% CI, -13 to 7] percentage point difference between groups; P > .99; Cramér V = 0.07).
In this randomized clinical trial, the combination of oral acitretin and TAC was more effective than TAC monotherapy in patients with symptomatic OLP.
Clinical Trial Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2018/11/016448.
重要性:口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的症状治疗具有挑战性。
目的:比较口服阿维 A 联合曲安奈德(TAC)与 TAC 单药治疗口腔有症状 OLP 的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项单中心、研究者发起的、安慰剂对照、研究者和患者双盲的随机临床试验,于 2018 年 12 月至 2020 年 6 月在印度昌迪加尔的研究生医学教育与研究学院进行,这是一家三级转诊中心。通过连续采样,招募了 64 名年龄在 18 岁及以上、有症状的 OLP 患者。数据于 2020 年 7 月至 12 月进行分析。
干预措施:患者被随机分为阿维 A(25-35mg/d)联合 TAC(治疗组)或 TAC 联合安慰剂(安慰剂组)治疗 28 周,治疗结束后再进行 8 周的无治疗随访(总研究时间为 36 周)。
主要结局和测量指标:采用口腔疾病严重程度评分(ODSS)、口腔健康影响量表 14 项(OHIP-14)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疾病严重程度和治疗反应。主要目的是评估两组患者在 28 周和 36 周时达到 ODSS-75(与基线相比,ODSS 降低 75%)的患者人数。
结果:64 例患者中,31 例在治疗组,30 例在安慰剂组完成了研究(平均[SD]年龄为 50.6[15.2]岁 vs 49.2[14.4]岁;男女性别比为 13:19 vs 16:16)。两组基线 ODSS、VAS 和 OHIP-14 评分相似。意向治疗分析显示,治疗组在 28 周(28[88%] vs 15[47%],组间差异为 41[95%CI,20-61]个百分点;P<.001;Cramer V=0.47)和 36 周(27[84%] vs 13[41%],组间差异为 43[95%CI,23-67]个百分点;P<.001;Cramer V=0.47)达到 ODSS 降低 75%或更高的患者比例显著高于安慰剂组。在治疗和安慰剂组中,在 8 周的治疗后随访期间,复发率均较低(1[3%] vs 2[6%],组间差异为 3[95%CI,-13 至 7]个百分点;P>.99;Cramer V=0.07)。
结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,与 TAC 单药治疗相比,阿维 A 联合 TAC 治疗口腔有症状 OLP 更有效。
试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心标识符:CTRI/2018/11/016448。