• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Have attacks on healthcare become the new normal? a public health call to action for armed conflicts before it is too late.对医疗保健的攻击已成为新常态?在为时已晚之前,针对武装冲突发出的公共卫生行动呼吁。
Confl Health. 2023 Dec 6;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00555-4.
2
Understanding and Preventing Attacks on Health Facilities During Armed Conflict in Syria.了解并预防叙利亚武装冲突期间针对医疗设施的袭击
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Mar 18;13:191-203. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S237256. eCollection 2020.
3
Attacks on healthcare facilities as an indicator of violence against civilians in Syria: An exploratory analysis of open-source data.叙利亚袭击医疗设施事件表明平民遭受暴力:对开源数据的探索性分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0217905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217905. eCollection 2019.
4
The right to health, public health and COVID-19: a discourse on the importance of the enforcement of humanitarian and human rights law in conflict settings for the future management of zoonotic pandemic diseases.健康权、公共卫生和 COVID-19:论在冲突环境中执行人道主义和人权法对未来管理人畜共患大流行病的重要性。
Public Health. 2021 Mar;192:3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Renewing our commitment to protect children experiencing armed conflict.重申我们保护受武装冲突影响儿童的承诺。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Mar;59(3):427-430. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16367. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
[Protection of medical personnel in contemporary armed conflicts].[当代武装冲突中医疗人员的保护]
Wiad Lek. 2016;69(2 Pt 2):280-4.
8
Correction: Have attacks on healthcare become the new normal? A public health call to action for armed conflicts before it is too late.更正:对医疗保健的攻击已成为新常态?在为时已晚之前,针对武装冲突发出的公共卫生行动呼吁。
Confl Health. 2024 Jan 30;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00564-3.
9
Determining the scope of attacks on health in four governorates of Syria in 2016: Results of a field surveillance program.确定 2016 年叙利亚四个省份对卫生的攻击范围:现场监测计划的结果。
PLoS Med. 2018 Apr 24;15(4):e1002559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002559. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Strategic Documentation of Violence against Healthcare: Towards a Methodology for Accountability.
World Health Popul. 2016;16(4):31-7. doi: 10.12927/whp.2016.24673.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to access to cancer care for patients from the conflict-affected region of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic: A qualitative study.纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫共和国冲突影响地区患者获得癌症护理的障碍:一项定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;4(7):e0003243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003243. eCollection 2024.
2
Drone Attacks on Health in 2023: International Humanitarian Law and the Right to Health.2023年无人机袭击对健康的影响:国际人道法与健康权
Health Hum Rights. 2024 Jun;26(1):143-146.
3
The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts.叙利亚袭击对健康的连锁影响:对卫生系统和社区影响的定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jun 13;4(6):e0002967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002967. eCollection 2024.
4
The implications of the Sudan war on healthcare workers and facilities: a health system tragedy.苏丹战争对医护人员和医疗设施的影响:一场卫生系统的悲剧。
Confl Health. 2024 Mar 17;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00581-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Caring Under Fire Across Three Continents: The Hadfield-Spears Ambulance, 1941-1945.战火中的救护:横跨三大洲的哈德菲尔德-斯皮尔斯救护车,1941 - 1945年
Soc Hist Med. 2023 Apr 9;36(2):284-315. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkad010. eCollection 2023 May.
2
The crisis of maternal and child health in Afghanistan.阿富汗的母婴健康危机。
Confl Health. 2023 Jun 12;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00522-z.
3
Underestimating attacks: comparing two sources of publicly-available data about attacks on health care in 2017.低估袭击事件:比较2017年关于医疗保健袭击事件的两个公开可用数据源。
Confl Health. 2023 Jan 30;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00498-w.
4
Why do people follow social norms?人们为什么要遵守社会规范?
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
5
Violence against healthcare in conflict: a systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research.冲突中针对医疗保健的暴力行为:文献系统综述及未来研究议程
Confl Health. 2021 May 7;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00372-7.

对医疗保健的攻击已成为新常态?在为时已晚之前,针对武装冲突发出的公共卫生行动呼吁。

Have attacks on healthcare become the new normal? a public health call to action for armed conflicts before it is too late.

作者信息

Blanchet Karl, Rubenstein Leonard, Taithe Bertrand, Fast Larissa

机构信息

Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Confl Health. 2023 Dec 6;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00555-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13031-023-00555-4
PMID:38057797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10701961/
Abstract

The scale of attacks on healthcare has become more visible and its impact greater in recent armed conflicts in Ukraine, Sudan and Myanmar. In these conflicts, combatants systematically target health facilities and ambulances. We need to ensure that attacks on healthcare do not become the new norm amongst governmental troops and non-State armed groups. There is limited evidence about why and how attacks on healthcare have become "normal" practice amongst many combatants, despite the likely tactical and strategic costs to themselves. We are convinced that the problem now needs to be tackled like any other public health issue by assessing: the scale of the problem; who is the most at risk; identifying risk factors; developing new interventions to prevent the risks or address the issue; and evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions.

摘要

在乌克兰、苏丹和缅甸最近发生的武装冲突中,对医疗保健的攻击规模变得更加明显,其影响也更大。在这些冲突中,战斗人员有系统地将医疗设施和救护车作为目标。我们需要确保对医疗保健的攻击不会成为政府部队和非国家武装团体中的新常态。关于为何以及如何对医疗保健的攻击在许多战斗人员中成为“常态”做法,证据有限,尽管这对他们自身可能存在战术和战略成本。我们坚信,现在需要像对待任何其他公共卫生问题一样来解决这个问题,即评估:问题的规模;谁是风险最大的群体;识别风险因素;制定新的干预措施以预防风险或解决问题;以及评估这些干预措施的有效性。