• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精准招募和参与糖尿病和高血压临床试验风险人群(PREDHICT):一项针对电子劝导式移动应用程序的随机试验,旨在为临床试验决策提供信息。

Precision Recruitment and Engagement of Individuals at Risk for Diabetes and Hypertension in Clinical Trials (PREDHICT): A Randomized Trial for an E-Persuasive Mobile Application to Inform Decision Making about Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Informatics and Health Data Science, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 27;20(23):7115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237115.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20237115
PMID:38063545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10706176/
Abstract

The primary objective of this randomized trial was to test the effectiveness of the PREDHiCT digital application, which provides educational and supportive navigation to increase willingness to participate in a future clinical trial. The second objective was to test whether PREDHiCT increased clinical trial literacy or enhanced psychological facilitators of clinical trial participation, such as altruism. To test these two objectives, we conducted a 1-month remote decentralized trial with 100 participants who either have a personal or family history of cardiometabolic health conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Results indicated significant changes in altruism (mean: -2.94 vs. 0.83; -value = 0.011) and clinical trial literacy (mean: 0.55 vs. 2.59; -value = 0.001) from baseline to 1-month follow-up between the control and intervention groups. Additionally, participants exposed to personalized clinical trial navigation had greater clinical trial literacy at the end of the study relative to the individuals in the control arm of the study. Our findings indicate that tailored education, navigation, and access to clinical trials-three unique features of our PREDHiCT app-increased altruism and clinical trial literacy but not willingness to participate in a trial.

摘要

本随机试验的主要目的是检验 PREDHiCT 数字应用程序的有效性,该程序提供教育和支持性导航,以增加参与未来临床试验的意愿。第二个目标是检验 PREDHiCT 是否能提高临床试验素养或增强参与临床试验的心理促进因素,如利他主义。为了检验这两个目标,我们进行了为期 1 个月的远程分散试验,共有 100 名参与者参加,他们要么有心血管代谢健康状况(如高血压、糖尿病和肥胖症)的个人或家族史。结果表明,在对照组和干预组之间,从基线到 1 个月的随访,利他主义(均值:-2.94 与 0.83;-值=0.011)和临床试验素养(均值:0.55 与 2.59;-值=0.001)均有显著变化。此外,与研究对照组相比,接受个性化临床试验导航的参与者在研究结束时具有更高的临床试验素养。我们的研究结果表明,个性化教育、导航和获得临床试验的机会——我们的 PREDHiCT 应用程序的三个独特特征——增加了利他主义和临床试验素养,但没有增加参与试验的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/431149fd78d5/ijerph-20-07115-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/89aa9000dcda/ijerph-20-07115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/f295570a8b21/ijerph-20-07115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/3325a02ac6f2/ijerph-20-07115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/53ea716678f3/ijerph-20-07115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/431149fd78d5/ijerph-20-07115-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/89aa9000dcda/ijerph-20-07115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/f295570a8b21/ijerph-20-07115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/3325a02ac6f2/ijerph-20-07115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/53ea716678f3/ijerph-20-07115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a28d/10706176/431149fd78d5/ijerph-20-07115-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Precision Recruitment and Engagement of Individuals at Risk for Diabetes and Hypertension in Clinical Trials (PREDHICT): A Randomized Trial for an E-Persuasive Mobile Application to Inform Decision Making about Clinical Trials.精准招募和参与糖尿病和高血压临床试验风险人群(PREDHICT):一项针对电子劝导式移动应用程序的随机试验,旨在为临床试验决策提供信息。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 27;20(23):7115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237115.
2
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
3
Augmenting Engagement in Decentralized Clinical Trials for Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Implementation of a Programmatic Architecture.增强心房颤动分散式临床试验中的参与度:一种程序化架构的开发与实施
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e66436. doi: 10.2196/66436.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
6
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
7
Exploring engagement patterns within a mobile health intervention for women at risk of gestational diabetes.探索针对有妊娠期糖尿病风险的女性的移动健康干预中的参与模式。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251327510. doi: 10.1177/17455057251327510. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
8
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
9
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
10
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Community engagement and clinical trial diversity: Navigating barriers and co-designing solutions-A report from the "Health Equity through Diversity" seminar series.社区参与和临床试验多样性:克服障碍和共同设计解决方案——来自“通过多样性实现健康公平”研讨会系列的报告。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281940. eCollection 2023.
2
Diversity, equity, and inclusion in clinical trials: A practical guide from the perspective of a trial sponsor.临床试验中的多样性、公平性和包容性:从试验赞助商的角度出发的实用指南。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Mar;126:107092. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107092. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Considerations for Embedding Inclusive Research Principles in the Design and Execution of Clinical Trials.
考虑将包容性研究原则嵌入临床试验的设计和执行中。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Mar;57(2):186-195. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00464-3. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
4
The Importance of Diversity in Clinical Trials.临床试验中多样性的重要性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Mar;113(3):486-488. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2707. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
New Opportunities and Cautionary Insights about Decentralizing and Deglobalizing Clinical Trials During the Great Lockdown.大封锁期间临床试验去中心化与去全球化的新机遇及警示性见解
AIB Insights. 2020 Nov 3;20(3). doi: 10.46697/001c.17692.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews.受试者参与临床试验的障碍与促进因素:综述概述
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Aug 3;23:100829. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100829. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Learning from remote decentralised clinical trial experiences: A qualitative analysis of interviews with trial personnel, patient representatives and other stakeholders.从远程去中心化临床试验经验中学习:对试验人员、患者代表和其他利益相关者进行访谈的定性分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;88(3):1031-1042. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15003. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
8
An Internet-Based Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management Integrated With Primary Care Electronic Health Records: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Implementation Fidelity and User Engagement.基于互联网的心血管疾病管理干预措施与初级保健电子健康记录集成:实施保真度和用户参与度的混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 26;23(4):e25333. doi: 10.2196/25333.
9
User Engagement With Smartphone Apps and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Outcomes: Systematic Review.智能手机应用程序的用户参与度与心血管疾病危险因素结果:系统评价。
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Feb 3;5(1):e18834. doi: 10.2196/18834.
10
Problem Solving to Enhance Clinical Trial Participation Utilizing a Framework-Driven Approach.运用框架驱动方法解决问题,提高临床试验参与率。
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2020 Aug;18(8):468-476.