Suppr超能文献

“不要与他们谈论照护目标”:理解预先医疗照护计划中的差异。

"Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):339-346. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab091.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Structurally marginalized groups experience disproportionately low rates of advance care planning (ACP). To improve equitable patient-centered end-of-life care, we examine barriers and facilitators to ACP among clinicians as they are central participants in these discussions.

METHOD

In this national study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively selected clinicians from 6 diverse health systems between August 2018 and June 2019. Thematic analysis yielded themes characterizing clinicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to ACP among patients, and patient-centered ways of overcoming them.

RESULTS

Among 74 participants, 49 (66.2%) were physicians, 16.2% were nurses, and 13.5% were social workers. Most worked in primary care (35.1%), geriatrics (21.1%), and palliative care (19.3%) settings. Clinicians most frequently expressed difficulty discussing ACP with certain racial and ethnic groups (African American, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American) (31.1%), non-native English speakers (24.3%), and those with certain religious beliefs (Catholic, Orthodox Jewish, and Muslim) (13.5%). Clinicians were more likely to attribute barriers to ACP completion to patients (62.2%), than to clinicians (35.1%) or health systems (37.8%). Three themes characterized clinicians' difficulty approaching ACP (preconceived views of patients' preferences, narrow definitions of successful ACP, and lack of institutional resources), while the final theme illustrated facilitators to ACP (acknowledging bias and rejecting stereotypes, mission-driven focus on ACP, and acceptance of all preferences).

CONCLUSIONS

Most clinicians avoided ACP with certain racial and ethnic groups, those with limited English fluency, and persons with certain religious beliefs. Our findings provide evidence to support development of clinician-level and institutional-level interventions and to reduce disparities in ACP.

摘要

背景

结构上处于边缘地位的群体进行预先医疗指示 (ACP) 的比例低得不成比例。为了改善公平的以患者为中心的临终关怀,我们研究了临床医生在进行这些讨论时进行 ACP 的障碍和促进因素,因为他们是这些讨论的核心参与者。

方法

在这项全国性研究中,我们在 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,与来自 6 个不同医疗系统的有针对性选择的临床医生进行了半结构式访谈。主题分析得出了描述临床医生对患者进行 ACP 的障碍和促进因素的看法,以及以患者为中心克服这些障碍的方法。

结果

在 74 名参与者中,49 名(66.2%)是医生,16.2%是护士,13.5%是社会工作者。大多数人在初级保健(35.1%)、老年病学(21.1%)和姑息治疗(19.3%)环境中工作。临床医生最常表示难以与某些族裔和种族群体(非裔美国人、西班牙裔、亚裔和美国原住民)(31.1%)、非英语母语者(24.3%)和某些宗教信仰者(天主教、东正教犹太教和穆斯林)(13.5%)讨论 ACP。临床医生更倾向于将 ACP 完成的障碍归因于患者(62.2%),而不是临床医生(35.1%)或医疗系统(37.8%)。三个主题描述了临床医生在接近 ACP 时遇到的困难(对患者偏好的先入为主的看法、成功 ACP 的狭隘定义和缺乏机构资源),而最后一个主题则说明了 ACP 的促进因素(承认偏见和摒弃刻板印象、以 ACP 为使命的关注以及接受所有偏好)。

结论

大多数临床医生避免与某些族裔和种族群体、英语流利程度有限的人和某些宗教信仰者进行 ACP。我们的研究结果为制定临床医生层面和机构层面的干预措施提供了证据,以减少 ACP 方面的差异。

相似文献

3
Advance Care Planning and Palliative Care Consultation in Kidney Transplantation.肾移植中的预先护理计划与姑息治疗咨询
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Mar;83(3):318-328. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.07.018. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical reflection: The palliative care ethos and patients who refuse information.伦理反思:姑息治疗理念与拒绝信息的患者
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jul 3;19:26323524251355287. doi: 10.1177/26323524251355287. eCollection 2025.
4
Patient Safety Event Risk and Language Barriers: A Scoping Review.患者安全事件风险与语言障碍:一项范围综述
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2025 Jun;51(6):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
6
How Do Clinicians Use Quotations in Goals of Care Notes?临床医生如何在照护目标记录中使用引文?
Chest. 2025 Jun;167(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

7
Trends in Racial/Ethnic Representation Among US Medical Students.美国医学生中种族/民族代表性的变化趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910490. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490.
8
End-of-Life Care Received by Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians.医生与非医生接受的临终关怀比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197650. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7650.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验