Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):339-346. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab091.
Structurally marginalized groups experience disproportionately low rates of advance care planning (ACP). To improve equitable patient-centered end-of-life care, we examine barriers and facilitators to ACP among clinicians as they are central participants in these discussions.
In this national study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively selected clinicians from 6 diverse health systems between August 2018 and June 2019. Thematic analysis yielded themes characterizing clinicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to ACP among patients, and patient-centered ways of overcoming them.
Among 74 participants, 49 (66.2%) were physicians, 16.2% were nurses, and 13.5% were social workers. Most worked in primary care (35.1%), geriatrics (21.1%), and palliative care (19.3%) settings. Clinicians most frequently expressed difficulty discussing ACP with certain racial and ethnic groups (African American, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American) (31.1%), non-native English speakers (24.3%), and those with certain religious beliefs (Catholic, Orthodox Jewish, and Muslim) (13.5%). Clinicians were more likely to attribute barriers to ACP completion to patients (62.2%), than to clinicians (35.1%) or health systems (37.8%). Three themes characterized clinicians' difficulty approaching ACP (preconceived views of patients' preferences, narrow definitions of successful ACP, and lack of institutional resources), while the final theme illustrated facilitators to ACP (acknowledging bias and rejecting stereotypes, mission-driven focus on ACP, and acceptance of all preferences).
Most clinicians avoided ACP with certain racial and ethnic groups, those with limited English fluency, and persons with certain religious beliefs. Our findings provide evidence to support development of clinician-level and institutional-level interventions and to reduce disparities in ACP.
结构上处于边缘地位的群体进行预先医疗指示 (ACP) 的比例低得不成比例。为了改善公平的以患者为中心的临终关怀,我们研究了临床医生在进行这些讨论时进行 ACP 的障碍和促进因素,因为他们是这些讨论的核心参与者。
在这项全国性研究中,我们在 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,与来自 6 个不同医疗系统的有针对性选择的临床医生进行了半结构式访谈。主题分析得出了描述临床医生对患者进行 ACP 的障碍和促进因素的看法,以及以患者为中心克服这些障碍的方法。
在 74 名参与者中,49 名(66.2%)是医生,16.2%是护士,13.5%是社会工作者。大多数人在初级保健(35.1%)、老年病学(21.1%)和姑息治疗(19.3%)环境中工作。临床医生最常表示难以与某些族裔和种族群体(非裔美国人、西班牙裔、亚裔和美国原住民)(31.1%)、非英语母语者(24.3%)和某些宗教信仰者(天主教、东正教犹太教和穆斯林)(13.5%)讨论 ACP。临床医生更倾向于将 ACP 完成的障碍归因于患者(62.2%),而不是临床医生(35.1%)或医疗系统(37.8%)。三个主题描述了临床医生在接近 ACP 时遇到的困难(对患者偏好的先入为主的看法、成功 ACP 的狭隘定义和缺乏机构资源),而最后一个主题则说明了 ACP 的促进因素(承认偏见和摒弃刻板印象、以 ACP 为使命的关注以及接受所有偏好)。
大多数临床医生避免与某些族裔和种族群体、英语流利程度有限的人和某些宗教信仰者进行 ACP。我们的研究结果为制定临床医生层面和机构层面的干预措施提供了证据,以减少 ACP 方面的差异。