• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项随机对照试验的研究方案:在急诊科整合“限时试验”

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department.

作者信息

Hashimoto Tadayuki, Putman Rachel K, Massaro Anthony F, Shiozawa Youkie, McGough Katherine, McCabe Kerry K, Linden Judith A, Wang Wei, Liu Shan W, Kennedy Maura, Neville Thanh H, Kruser Jacqueline M, Sudore Rebecca L, Schonberg Mara A, Tulsky James A, Ouchi Kei

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of General Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0313858
PMID:
39715103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11666031/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Time-limited trial (TLT) is a structured approach between clinicians and seriously ill patients or their surrogates to discuss patients' values and preferences, prognosis, and shared decision-making to use specific therapies for a prespecified period of time in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Some evidence exists that this approach may lead to more patient-centered care in the intensive care unit; however, it has never been evaluated in the emergency department (ED). The study protocol aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of TLTs initiated in the ED.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a parallel group, clinician-level, pilot randomized clinical trial among 40 ED clinicians. We will measure feasibility (e.g., the time it takes to conduct the TLTs by ED clinicians) and clinician and patient-reported acceptability of the TLT, and also track patients' clinical outcomes via medical record review.

DISCUSSION

This study protocol will investigate the potential of TLT initiated in the ED to lead to patient-centered intensive care utilization. By doing so, the study intends to improve palliative care integration for seriously ill older adults in the ED and intensive care unit.

TRIAL IDENTIFIER AND REGISTRY NAME

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06378151 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06378151; Pre-results; a randomized controlled trial: Time-limited Trials in the Emergency Department.

摘要

引言

限时试验(TLT)是临床医生与重症患者或其代理人之间采用的一种结构化方法,用于讨论患者的价值观和偏好、预后,并在预后不确定的情况下就特定时间段内使用特定治疗方法进行共同决策。有证据表明,这种方法可能会在重症监护病房带来更以患者为中心的护理;然而,它从未在急诊科(ED)进行过评估。本研究方案旨在评估在急诊科启动限时试验的可行性和可接受性。

方法与分析

我们将在40名急诊科临床医生中进行一项平行组、临床医生层面的试点随机临床试验。我们将测量可行性(例如,急诊科临床医生进行限时试验所需的时间)以及临床医生和患者报告的限时试验可接受性,并通过病历审查跟踪患者的临床结果。

讨论

本研究方案将调查在急诊科启动的限时试验能否带来以患者为中心的重症监护利用。通过这样做,该研究旨在改善急诊科和重症监护病房中重症老年患者的姑息治疗整合。

试验识别码和注册名称

ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT06378151 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06378151;预结果;一项随机对照试验:急诊科限时试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/93e178359a0f/pone.0313858.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/05ef0ba57a9f/pone.0313858.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/e60563e72f1e/pone.0313858.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/93e178359a0f/pone.0313858.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/05ef0ba57a9f/pone.0313858.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/e60563e72f1e/pone.0313858.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278e/11666031/93e178359a0f/pone.0313858.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department.一项随机对照试验的研究方案:在急诊科整合“限时试验”
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858. eCollection 2024.
2
Emergency department-based, nurse-initiated, serious illness conversation intervention for older adults: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于急诊科的、由护士发起的老年患者严重疾病对话干预:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 9;23(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06797-6.
3
Emergency department-initiated palliative care for advanced cancer patients: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.急诊科为晚期癌症患者启动姑息治疗:一项试点随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2014 Jun 25;15:251. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-251.
4
The Chest Pain Choice trial: a pilot randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.胸痛选择试验:一项针对急诊科胸痛患者的决策辅助工具的初步随机试验。
Trials. 2010 May 17;11:57. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-57.
5
Machine learning for risk stratification in the emergency department (MARS-ED) study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial on the implementation of a prediction model based on machine learning technology predicting 31-day mortality in the emergency department.基于机器学习技术的预测模型在急诊科应用的风险分层(MARS-ED)研究方案:一项随机对照预试验研究方案,旨在预测急诊科 31 天死亡率。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 23;32(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01177-2.
6
A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a dedicated health and social care professionals team in the emergency department on the quality, safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness of care for older adults: a study protocol.一项随机对照试验,旨在探索在急诊科中设立专门的医疗和社会保健专业人员团队对老年人护理的质量、安全性、临床效果和成本效益的影响:研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3697-5.
7
Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of a Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Surrogates of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury.严重急性脑损伤患者代理人的关怀目标决策辅助工具的初步随机临床试验。
Neurology. 2022 Oct 3;99(14):e1446-e1455. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200937.
8
Peer Intervention to Link Overdose Survivors to Treatment (PILOT): Protocol for a Multisite, Randomized Controlled Trial Conducted Within the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network.同伴干预将过量幸存者与治疗联系起来 (PILOT):在国家药物滥用研究所临床试验网络内进行的多地点、随机对照试验的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 17;13:e60277. doi: 10.2196/60277.
9
Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of specialty outpatient versus nurse-led telephonic palliative care of older adults with advanced illness.急症医学舒缓医疗服务获取(EMPallA):一项多中心随机对照试验的方案,旨在比较专科门诊与护士主导的电话舒缓医疗对老年晚期疾病患者的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 25;9(1):e025692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025692.
10
Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses to Reduce Nonbeneficial Intensive Care Unit Treatments: Protocol for a Multicenter Quality Improvement Study.晚期重症患者限时试验以减少无益的重症监护病房治疗:一项多中心质量改进研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Nov 25;8(11):e16301. doi: 10.2196/16301.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义危重症患者的限时临床试验:美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Feb;21(2):187-199. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-925ST.
2
Three Stories About the Value of Advance Care Planning.关于预先护理计划价值的三个故事。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2133-2134. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.21075.
3
Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies.设计和评估可行性试点研究指南。
Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001664.
4
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
5
Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments.评估患有晚期内科疾病的危重症患者的限时试验和减少无益的 ICU 治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jun 1;181(6):786-794. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1000.
6
Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第1部分:执行摘要:2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S337-S357. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
Managing Code Status Conversations for Seriously Ill Older Adults in Respiratory Failure.为呼吸衰竭的老年重症患者处理医疗状态沟通问题
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;76(6):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
8
Feasibility of a Brief Intervention to Facilitate Advance Care Planning Conversations for Patients with Life-Limiting Illness in the Emergency Department.急诊科针对患有危及生命疾病的患者进行简短干预以促进预立医疗计划对话的可行性。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;24(1):31-39. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0067. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
Seriously Ill Patients' Willingness to Trade Survival Time to Avoid High Treatment Intensity at the End of Life.重病患者愿意用生存时间换取临终时避免高强度治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):907-909. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0681.
10
The Importance of Addressing Advance Care Planning and Decisions About Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders During Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).在2019年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情期间,重视预先医疗计划及关于不进行心肺复苏医嘱决策的重要性
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1771-1772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4894.