Awad Akil, Dillenbeck Emelie, Dankiewicz Josef, Ringh Mattias, Forsberg Sune, Svensson Leif, Claesson Andreas, Hollenberg Jacob, Nordberg Per
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Center for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Cardiology, 22385 Lund, Sweden.
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 24;12(23):7288. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237288.
In animal models, early initiation of therapeutic cooling, intra-arrest, or restored circulation has been shown to be neuroprotective shortly after cardiac arrest. We aimed to assess the feasibility and cooling efficacy of transnasal evaporative cooling, initiated as early as possible after hospital arrival in patients randomized to cooling in the TTM2 trial. This study took the form of a single-center (Södersjukhuset, Stockholm) substudy of the TTM2 trial (NCT02908308) comparing target temperature management (TTM) to 33 °C versus normothermia in OHCA. In patients randomized to TTM33 °C, transnasal evaporative cooling was applied as fast as possible. The primary objectives were the feasibility aspects of initiating cooling in different hospital locations (i.e., in the emergency department, coronary cathlab, intensive care unit (ICU), and during intrahospital transport) and its effectiveness (i.e., time to reach target temperature). Transnasal cooling was continued for two hours or until patients reached a core temperature of <34 °C. Cooling intervals were compared to participants at the same site who were randomized to hypothermia and treated at 33 °C but who for different reasons did not receive transnasal evaporative cooling. From October 2018 to January 2020, 32 patients were recruited, of which 17 were randomized to the TTM33. Among them, 10 patients (8 men, median age 69 years) received transnasal evaporative cooling prior to surface systemic cooling in the ICU. In three patients, cooling was started in the emergency department; in two patients, it was started in the coronary cathlab, and in five patients, it was started in the ICU, of which three patients were subsequently transported to the coronary cathlab or to perform a CT scan. The median time to initiate transnasal cooling from randomization was 9 min (range: 5 to 39 min). The median time from randomization to a core body temperature of 34 °C was 120 min (range 60 to 334) compared to 178 min among those in the TTM33 group that did not receive TNEC and to 33 °C 230 min (range: 152 to 351) vs. 276 min (range: 150 to 546). No feasibility or technical issues were reported. No adverse events occurred besides minor nosebleeds. The early induction of transnasal cooling in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients was feasible to initiate in the emergency department, coronary cathlab, ICU, and during intrahospital transport. Time to target temperature was shortened compared to standard cooling.
在动物模型中,治疗性降温的早期启动、心脏骤停期间或恢复循环后,已被证明在心脏骤停后不久具有神经保护作用。我们旨在评估经鼻蒸发冷却的可行性和降温效果,该方法在TTM2试验中随机接受降温治疗的患者入院后尽早启动。本研究采用了TTM2试验(NCT02908308)的单中心(斯德哥尔摩南医院)子研究形式,比较院外心脏骤停患者目标温度管理(TTM)至33℃与正常体温的效果。在随机分配至33℃ TTM的患者中,尽快应用经鼻蒸发冷却。主要目标是在不同医院地点(即急诊科、冠状动脉导管室、重症监护病房(ICU)和院内转运期间)启动降温的可行性方面及其有效性(即达到目标温度的时间)。经鼻降温持续两小时或直至患者核心体温<34℃。将降温间隔与同一地点随机分配至低温治疗并在33℃接受治疗但因不同原因未接受经鼻蒸发冷却的参与者进行比较。从2018年10月至2020年1月,招募了32名患者,其中17名被随机分配至33℃ TTM组。其中,10名患者(8名男性,中位年龄69岁)在ICU进行体表全身降温之前接受了经鼻蒸发冷却。3名患者在急诊科开始降温;2名患者在冠状动脉导管室开始降温,5名患者在ICU开始降温,其中3名患者随后被转运至冠状动脉导管室或进行CT扫描。从随机分组到开始经鼻降温的中位时间为9分钟(范围:5至39分钟)。从随机分组到核心体温达到34℃的中位时间为120分钟(范围60至334分钟),而未接受经鼻蒸发冷却的33℃ TTM组患者为178分钟,正常体温组为230分钟(范围:152至351分钟),而未接受经鼻蒸发冷却的33℃ TTM组患者为276分钟(范围:150至546分钟)。未报告可行性或技术问题。除轻微鼻出血外,未发生不良事件。在院外心脏骤停患者中,在急诊科、冠状动脉导管室、ICU和院内转运期间尽早进行经鼻降温是可行的。与标准降温相比,达到目标温度的时间缩短。