Ward Jessica A, Yerke Jason, Lumpkin Mollie, Kapoor Aanchal, Lindenmeyer Christina C, Bass Stephanie
Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
World J Hepatol. 2023 Nov 27;15(11):1226-1236. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i11.1226.
Rifaximin is frequently administered to critically ill patients with liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, but patients currently or recently treated with antibiotics were frequently excluded from studies of rifaximin efficacy. Due to overlapping spectrums of activity, combination therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics and rifaximin may be unnecessary. A pharmacist-driven protocol was piloted to reduce potentially overlapping therapy in critically ill patients with liver disease. It was hypothesized that withholding rifaximin during broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy would be safe and reduce healthcare costs.
To determine the clinical, safety, and financial impact of discontinuing rifaximin during broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in critically ill liver patients.
This was a single-center, quasi-experimental, pre-post study based on a pilot pharmacist-driven protocol. Patients in the protocol group were prospectively identified the medical intensive care unit (ICU) (MICU) protocol to have rifaximin withheld during broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. These were compared to a historical cohort who received combination therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics and rifaximin. All data were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was days alive and free of delirium and coma (DAFD) to 14 d. Safety outcomes included MICU length of stay, 48-h change in vasopressor dose, and ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes characterized rifaximin cost savings and protocol adherence. Multivariable analysis was utilized to evaluate the association between group assignment and the primary outcome while controlling for potential confounding factors.
Each group included 32 patients. The median number of delirium- and coma-free days was similar in the control and protocol groups [3 interquartile range (IQR 0, 8) 2 (IQR 0, 9.5), = 0.93]. In multivariable analysis, group assignment was not associated with a reduced ratio of days alive and free of delirium or coma at 14 d. The protocol resulted in a reduced median duration of rifaximin use during broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy [6 d control (IQR 3, 9.5) 1 d protocol (IQR 0, 1); < 0.001]. Rates of other secondary clinical and safety outcomes were similar including ICU mortality and 48-h change in vasopressor requirements. Overall adherence to the protocol was 91.4%. The median estimated total cost of rifaximin therapy per patient was reduced from $758.40 (IQR $379.20, $1200.80) to $126.40 (IQR $0, $126.40), < 0.01.
The novel pharmacist-driven protocol for rifaximin discontinuation was associated with significant cost savings and no differences in safety outcomes including DAFD.
利福昔明常用于治疗患有肝病和肝性脑病的重症患者,但目前正在使用或近期接受过抗生素治疗的患者通常被排除在利福昔明疗效研究之外。由于活性谱重叠,广谱抗生素与利福昔明联合治疗可能没有必要。一项由药剂师主导的方案进行了试点,以减少肝病重症患者潜在的重叠治疗。据推测,在广谱抗生素治疗期间停用利福昔明是安全的,并且可以降低医疗成本。
确定在肝病重症患者的广谱抗生素治疗期间停用利福昔明对临床、安全性和财务的影响。
这是一项基于药剂师主导的试点方案的单中心、准实验性前后对照研究。方案组的患者是在医学重症监护病房(MICU)前瞻性确定的,按照方案在广谱抗生素治疗期间停用利福昔明。将这些患者与接受广谱抗生素和利福昔明联合治疗的历史队列进行比较。所有数据均为回顾性收集。主要结局是至14天时存活且无谵妄和昏迷的天数(DAFD)。安全性结局包括MICU住院时间、血管升压药剂量48小时内的变化以及ICU死亡率。次要结局包括利福昔明成本节约情况和方案依从性。采用多变量分析来评估分组与主要结局之间的关联,同时控制潜在的混杂因素。
每组包括32例患者。对照组和方案组无谵妄和昏迷天数的中位数相似[3天(四分位间距IQR 0,8)对2天(IQR 0,9.5),P = 0.93]。在多变量分析中,分组与14天时存活且无谵妄或昏迷天数的降低比例无关。该方案导致广谱抗生素治疗期间利福昔明使用的中位数持续时间缩短[对照组6天(IQR 3,9.5)对方案组1天(IQR 0,1);P < 0.001]。其他次要临床和安全性结局的发生率相似,包括ICU死亡率和血管升压药需求48小时内的变化。方案总体依从率为91.4%。每位患者利福昔明治疗的估计总费用中位数从758.40美元(IQR 379.20美元,1200.80美元)降至126.40美元(IQR 0美元,126.40美元),P < 0.01。
新型药剂师主导的利福昔明停药方案可显著节约成本,且在包括DAFD在内的安全性结局方面无差异。