Kulla Artenisa, Coury Saché, Garcia Jordan M, Teresi Giana I, Sisk Lucinda M, Hansen Melissa, Miller Jonas G, Gotlib Ian H, Ho Tiffany C
College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Oct 14;4(1):61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.10.002. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Neighborhood- or area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with neural alterations across the life span. However, few studies have examined the effects of neighborhood disadvantage on white matter microstructure during adolescence, an important period of development that coincides with increased risk for psychopathology.
In 200 adolescents (ages 13-20 years; 54.5% female, 4% nonbinary) recruited from 2 studies enriched for early adversity and depression, we examined whether neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage derived from census tract data was related to white matter microstructure in several major white matter tracts. We also examined whether depressive symptoms and sex moderated these associations.
Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with lower fractional anisotropy (FA) in the left arcuate fasciculus (β = -0.24, false discovery rate [FDR]-corrected = .035) and right uncinate fasciculus (β = -0.32, FDR-corrected = .002) above and beyond the effects of family-level socioeconomic status. Depressive symptoms significantly moderated the association between left arcuate fasciculus FA and both neighborhood (β = 0.17, FDR-corrected = .026) and unemployment (β = 0.22, FDR-corrected = .004) disadvantage such that these associations were only significant in adolescents who reported less severe depression. Sex did not moderate the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and FA in these tracts.
Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, particularly poverty and educational attainment levels, was associated with lower FA in the arcuate fasciculus and uncinate fasciculus above and beyond the effects of family-level measures of socioeconomic status. These patterns were only observed in adolescents with low levels of depression, suggesting that we must be cautious about generalizing these findings to youths who struggle with mental health difficulties.
邻里或社区层面的社会经济劣势与一生中的神经改变有关。然而,很少有研究探讨邻里劣势对青少年白质微观结构的影响,青少年时期是一个重要的发育阶段,同时也是精神病理学风险增加的时期。
在从两项富集早期逆境和抑郁因素的研究中招募的200名青少年(年龄13 - 20岁;54.5%为女性,4%为非二元性别)中,我们研究了从人口普查区数据得出的邻里社会经济劣势是否与几个主要白质束的白质微观结构有关。我们还研究了抑郁症状和性别是否调节了这些关联。
邻里社会经济劣势越大,与左侧弓状束(β = -0.24,错误发现率[FDR]校正后 = 0.035)和右侧钩束(β = -0.32,FDR校正后 = 0.002)中较低的各向异性分数(FA)相关,这超出了家庭层面社会经济地位的影响。抑郁症状显著调节了左侧弓状束FA与邻里(β = 0.17,FDR校正后 = 0.026)和失业(β = 0.22,FDR校正后 = 0.004)劣势之间的关联,使得这些关联仅在报告抑郁程度较轻的青少年中显著。性别并未调节这些白质束中社会经济劣势与FA之间的关联。
邻里社会经济劣势越大,尤其是贫困和教育程度水平,与弓状束和钩束中较低的FA相关,这超出了家庭层面社会经济地位测量指标的影响。这些模式仅在抑郁水平较低的青少年中观察到,这表明我们在将这些发现推广到有心理健康问题的青少年时必须谨慎。