Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
School of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Ste Anne de Bellevue, QC, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 12;25:e48267. doi: 10.2196/48267.
Youths with type 1 diabetes (T1D) frequently experience stigma. Internet-based peer communities can mitigate this through social support but require leaders to catalyze exchange. Whether nurturing potential leaders translates into a central role has not been well studied. Another issue understudied in such communities is lurking, the viewing of exchanges without commenting or posting.
We aimed to assess the centrality of the peer leaders we selected, trained, and incentivized within the Canadian Virtual Peer Network (VPN)-T1D. This is a private Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc) group that we created for persons aged 14 to 24 years with T1D. We specifically sought to (1) compare a quantitative estimate of network centrality between peer leaders and regular members, (2) assess the proportions of network exchanges that were social support oriented, and (3) assess proportions of high engagement (posts, comments, reactions, and votes) and low engagement (lurking) exchanges.
We recruited peer leaders and members with T1D from prior study cohorts and clinics. We trained 10 leaders, provided them with a monthly stipend, and encouraged them to post on the private Facebook group we launched on June 21, 2017. We extracted all communications (posts, messages, reactions, polls, votes, and views) that occurred until March 20, 2020. We calculated each member's centrality (80% of higher engagement communications comprising posts, comments, and reactions plus 20% of members with whom they connected). We divided each member's centrality by the highest centrality to compute the relative centrality, and compared the mean values between leaders and members (linear regression). We calculated the proportions of communications that were posts, comments, reactions, and views without reaction. We performed content analysis with a social support framework (informational, emotional, esteem-related, network, and tangible support), applying a maximum of 3 codes per communication.
VPN-T1D gained 212 regular members and 10 peer leaders over 33 months; of these 222 members, 26 (11.7%) exited. Peer leaders had 10-fold higher relative centrality than regular members (mean 0.53, SD 0.26 vs mean 0.04, SD 0.05; 0.49 difference; 95% CI 0.44-0.53). Overall, 91.4% (203/222) of the members connected at least once through posts, comments, or reactions. Among the 75,051 communications, there were 5109 (6.81%) posts, comments, and polls, 6233 (8.31%) reactions, and 63,709 (84.9%) views (lurking). Moreover, 54.9% (3430/6253) of codes applied were social support related, 66.4% (2277/3430) of which were informational (eg, insurance and travel preparation), and 20.4% (699/3430) of which were esteem related (eg, relieving blame).
Designating, training, and incentivizing peer leaders may stimulate content exchange and creation. Social support was a key VPN-T1D deliverable. Although lurking accounted for a high proportion of the overall activity, even those demonstrating this type of passive participation likely derived benefits, given that the network exit rate was low.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/18714.
青少年 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者经常会受到歧视。基于互联网的同伴社区可以通过社会支持来减轻这种情况,但需要领导者来促进交流。培养潜在领导者是否能转化为核心角色,这一点尚未得到很好的研究。在这样的社区中,另一个研究不足的问题是潜伏,即不发表评论或发布信息就浏览交流内容。
我们旨在评估我们在加拿大虚拟同伴网络(VPN-T1D)中选择、培训和激励的同伴领导者的核心地位。这是一个私人的 Facebook(Meta Platforms,Inc)群组,我们为 14 至 24 岁的 T1D 患者创建了这个群组。我们特别希望:(1)比较同伴领导者和普通成员之间网络中心性的定量估计;(2)评估以社会支持为导向的网络交流比例;(3)评估高参与度(帖子、评论、反应和投票)和低参与度(潜伏)交流的比例。
我们招募了来自先前研究队列和诊所的 T1D 同伴领导者和成员。我们培训了 10 名领导者,为他们提供了每月津贴,并鼓励他们在 2017 年 6 月 21 日发布的私人 Facebook 群组上发布信息。我们提取了截至 2020 年 3 月 20 日发生的所有通信(帖子、消息、反应、投票和查看)。我们计算了每个成员的中心性(80%的高参与度通信包括帖子、评论和反应,加上 20%的与他们连接的成员)。我们将每个成员的中心性除以最高中心性来计算相对中心性,并比较领导者和成员之间的平均值(线性回归)。我们计算了没有反应的帖子、评论、反应和查看的通信比例。我们使用社会支持框架(信息、情感、尊重相关、网络和有形支持)进行内容分析,每个通信最多应用 3 个代码。
VPN-T1D 在 33 个月内招募了 212 名普通成员和 10 名同伴领导者;其中 222 名成员中,有 26 名(11.7%)退出。同伴领导者的相对中心性比普通成员高 10 倍(平均 0.53,SD 0.26 与平均 0.04,SD 0.05;0.49 差异;95%CI 0.44-0.53)。总体而言,91.4%(222/242)的成员至少通过帖子、评论或反应进行过一次连接。在 75051 条通信中,有 5109 条(6.81%)是帖子、评论和投票,6233 条(8.31%)是反应,63709 条(84.9%)是查看(潜伏)。此外,应用的 6330 个代码中有 54.9%(3430/6253)与社会支持有关,其中 66.4%(2277/3430)是信息性的(例如,保险和旅行准备),20.4%(699/3430)是尊重相关的(例如,减轻指责)。
指定、培训和激励同伴领导者可能会刺激内容交流和创作。社会支持是 VPN-T1D 的一个关键交付成果。尽管潜伏占总活动的比例很高,但由于网络退出率较低,即使是这种被动参与类型的成员也可能从中受益,因为他们获得了好处。
国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR2-10.2196/18714。