Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Mar;26(3):287-92. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
Several disease-specific information exchanges now exist on Facebook and other online social networking sites. These new sources of knowledge, support, and engagement have become important for patients living with chronic disease, yet the quality and content of the information provided in these digital arenas are poorly understood.
To qualitatively evaluate the content of communication in Facebook communities dedicated to diabetes.
We identified the 15 largest Facebook groups focused on diabetes management. For each group, we downloaded the 15 most recent "wall posts" and the 15 most recent discussion topics from the 10 largest groups.
Four hundred eighty unique users were identified in a series of 690 comments from wall posts and discussion topics.
Posts were abstracted and aggregated into a database. Two investigators evaluated the posts, developed a thematic coding scheme, and applied codes to the data.
Patients with diabetes, family members, and their friends use Facebook to share personal clinical information, to request disease-specific guidance and feedback, and to receive emotional support. Approximately two-thirds of posts included unsolicited sharing of diabetes management strategies, over 13% of posts provided specific feedback to information requested by other users, and almost 29% of posts featured an effort by the poster to provide emotional support to others as members of a community. Approximately 27% of posts featured some type of promotional activity, generally presented as testimonials advertising non-FDA approved, "natural" products. Clinically inaccurate recommendations were infrequent, but were usually associated with promotion of a specific product or service. Thirteen percent of posts contained requests for personal information from Facebook participants.
Facebook provides a forum for reporting personal experiences, asking questions, and receiving direct feedback for people living with diabetes. However, promotional activity and personal data collection are also common, with no accountability or checks for authenticity.
目前在 Facebook 和其他在线社交网站上存在着几种特定疾病的信息交流。这些新的知识、支持和参与来源对于患有慢性疾病的患者来说变得非常重要,但这些数字领域提供的信息的质量和内容却知之甚少。
定性评估专门针对糖尿病的 Facebook 社区中的交流内容。
我们确定了 15 个最大的专注于糖尿病管理的 Facebook 群组。对于每个群组,我们从 10 个最大的群组中下载了最近的 15 个“墙帖”和最近的 15 个讨论主题。
在一系列 690 条墙帖和讨论主题的评论中,我们确定了 480 位独特的用户。
帖子被摘录并汇总到一个数据库中。两名调查员评估了帖子,制定了主题编码方案,并将代码应用于数据。
糖尿病患者、家属和朋友使用 Facebook 分享个人临床信息,请求特定疾病的指导和反馈,并获得情感支持。大约三分之二的帖子包含未经请求的糖尿病管理策略分享,超过 13%的帖子对其他用户请求的信息提供了具体反馈,几乎 29%的帖子展示了发帖人作为社区成员向他人提供情感支持的努力。大约 27%的帖子具有某种形式的促销活动,通常以宣传非 FDA 批准的“天然”产品的推荐形式出现。临床不准确的建议很少见,但通常与宣传特定产品或服务有关。13%的帖子包含来自 Facebook 参与者的个人信息请求。
Facebook 为患有糖尿病的人提供了一个报告个人经历、提问和获得直接反馈的论坛。然而,促销活动和个人信息收集也很常见,没有真实性的责任或检查。