Suppr超能文献

在 AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 方案的巩固阶段给予 4 个额外剂量的 PEG-L-天冬酰胺酶并不会改善高危 ALL 的预后并增加毒性:一项随机研究的结果。

Four Additional Doses of PEG-L-Asparaginase During the Consolidation Phase in the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 Protocol Do Not Improve Outcome and Increase Toxicity in High-Risk ALL: Results of a Randomized Study.

机构信息

Tettamanti Center, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 10;42(8):915-926. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01388. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 protocol included, at the end of the induction phase, a randomized study of patients with high-risk (HR) ALL to investigate if an intensive exposure to pegylated L-asparaginase (PEG-ASNASE, 2,500 IU/sqm once a week × 4) on top of BFM consolidation phase IB allowed us to decrease minimal residual disease (MRD) and improve outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,097 patients presented, from June 2010 to February 2017, with one or more of the following HR criteria: rearrangement, hypodiploidy, prednisone poor response, poor bone marrow response at day 15 (Flow MRD ≥10%), or no complete remission (CR) at the end of induction. Of them, 809 (85.1%) were randomly assigned to receive (404) or not receive (405) four weekly doses of PEG-ASNASE.

RESULTS

By intention to treat (ITT) analysis, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with polimerase chain reaction MRD ≥5 × 10 at the end of phase IB in the experimental versus control arm (13.9% 17.0%, = .25). The 5-year event-free survival (median follow-up 6.3 years) by ITT in the experimental and control arms was 70.4% (2.3) versus 75.0% (2.2; = .18), and the 5-year overall survival was 81.5% (2.0) versus 84.0% (1.9; = .25), respectively. The corresponding 5-year cumulative incidence of death in CR was 9.5% (1.5) versus 5.7% (1.2; = .08), and that of relapse was 17.7% (1.9) versus 17.2% (1.9), respectively ( = .94). Adverse reactions in phase IB occurred in 22.2% and 8.9% of patients in the experimental and control arm, respectively ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

Additional PEG-ASNASE in phase IB did not translate into a benefit for decreasing relapse incidence but was associated with higher toxicity. Further improvements with conventional chemotherapy might be difficult in the context of intensive treatment protocols.

摘要

目的

AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 方案在诱导阶段结束时进行了一项随机研究,该研究纳入了高危(HR)ALL 患者,旨在探讨在 BFM 巩固治疗 IB 阶段之上强化使用聚乙二醇化 L-天冬酰胺酶(PEG-ASNASE,2500IU/sqm,每周 1 次×4 次)是否能够降低微小残留病(MRD)并改善结局。

方法

共有 1097 例患者于 2010 年 6 月至 2017 年 2 月就诊,这些患者存在以下一项或多项 HR 标准:重排、亚二倍体、泼尼松反应不良、第 15 天骨髓反应不良(流式细胞术 MRD≥10%)或诱导结束时未达完全缓解(CR)。其中 809 例(85.1%)被随机分配接受(404 例)或不接受(405 例)每周 4 次的 PEG-ASNASE 治疗。

结果

根据意向治疗(ITT)分析,实验组和对照组在巩固治疗 IB 期末 PCR-MRD≥5×10 的患者比例无显著差异(13.9%比 17.0%,=0.25)。实验组和对照组的 ITT 5 年无事件生存(中位随访 6.3 年)率分别为 70.4%(2.3)和 75.0%(2.2;=0.18),5 年总生存(2.0)和 84.0%(1.9;=0.25)。CR 时 5 年累积死亡率分别为 9.5%(1.5)和 5.7%(1.2;=0.08),5 年复发率分别为 17.7%(1.9)和 17.2%(1.9)(=0.94)。巩固治疗 IB 期不良反应发生率分别为实验组 22.2%和对照组 8.9%(<0.001)。

结论

巩固治疗 IB 期增加 PEG-ASNASE 并未降低复发率,但与更高的毒性相关。在强化治疗方案背景下,常规化疗可能难以进一步改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验