• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ABCDE 方法:在低收入国家评估依从性。

The ABCDE approach: Evaluation of adherence in a low-income country.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences and Technology (UMST), Khartoum, Sudan.

Department of Surgery, Orthopedics and Trauma, University of Medical Sciences and Technology (UMST), Khartoum, Sudan.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 May;55(5):111268. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111268. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2023.111268
PMID:38097486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early recognition and initial treatment of trauma patients prevents deterioration and buys time for making a definitive diagnosis. The "Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability and Exposure" (ABCDE) approach should be used whenever an injury is suspected. It provides quick identification and management of life-threatening problems. Still, there is limited knowledge regarding adherence to the ABCDE approach. This research aims to assess the adherence of the trauma team members to the ABCDE approach in the management of major trauma patients and the factors affecting it.

METHOD

The study is a cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted in the trauma and resuscitation rooms of major governmental hospitals in Khartoum in the period from Jan.30, 2022, to Mar.29, 2022. It was done among the medical staff dealing with major trauma cases. Data were collected by observation using a modified standardized checklist for assessing the ABCDE approach and via a self-administered questionnaire for identifying the factors affecting adherence. Total coverage of all major trauma cases resuscitation (n = 50) was done. Also, a sample size of 158 medical staff was covered for the questionnaire. The data was analyzed in Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) V.23.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of adherence to the ABCDE approach was 37.9 % (SD 15.44). When the ABCDE sequence was not followed, the ACB was the commonest sequence. Also, adherence had no significant relation with any patient or staff-related factor. The main present obstacles to adherence to the ABCDE approach were overcrowding in the room and unprepared facilities. While the major present facilitator was the clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

The adherence rate was low, but initiation of the ABCDE approach was rapid. The factors participating in low adherence rates were usually facility or population-based factors. We recommend further studies, further training and embedment of guidelines, and the provision of larger trauma rooms with adequate supplies.

摘要

背景

早期识别和初步治疗创伤患者可防止病情恶化,并为明确诊断争取时间。每当怀疑有损伤时,都应采用“气道、呼吸、循环、残疾和暴露”(ABCDE)方法。它可快速识别和处理危及生命的问题。然而,人们对 ABCDE 方法的依从性知之甚少。本研究旨在评估创伤团队成员在处理重大创伤患者时对 ABCDE 方法的依从性及其影响因素。

方法

这是一项在 2022 年 1 月 30 日至 3 月 29 日期间在喀土穆的主要政府医院的创伤和复苏室进行的基于医院的横断面研究。研究对象为处理重大创伤病例的医务人员。使用改良的标准化检查表评估 ABCDE 方法,通过自我管理问卷评估影响依从性的因素,通过观察收集数据。对所有重大创伤病例的复苏进行了全面覆盖(n=50)。还对 158 名医务人员进行了问卷调查,以覆盖样本量。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)V.23。

结果

ABCDE 方法的依从率平均为 37.9%(SD 15.44)。当不遵循 ABCDE 顺序时,最常见的顺序是 ACB。此外,依从性与任何患者或员工相关因素均无显著关系。遵循 ABCDE 方法的主要障碍是房间拥挤和设施准备不足。而主要的促进因素是临床经验。

结论

依从率较低,但 ABCDE 方法的启动速度很快。导致低依从率的因素通常是设施或人口因素。我们建议进行进一步的研究、进一步的培训和实施指南,并提供更大的创伤室,配备充足的供应品。

相似文献

1
The ABCDE approach: Evaluation of adherence in a low-income country.ABCDE 方法:在低收入国家评估依从性。
Injury. 2024 May;55(5):111268. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111268. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Healthcare Professional's Knowledge of the Systemic ABCDE Approach: A Cross-Sectional Study.医疗保健专业人员对系统性ABCDE方法的认知:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 1;16(1):e51464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51464. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Adherence to the ABCDE approach in relation to the method of instruction: a randomized controlled simulation study.遵循 ABCDE 方法与教学方法的关系:一项随机对照模拟研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 15;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00509-0.
4
The ABCDE approach in critically ill patients: A scoping review of assessment tools, adherence and reported outcomes.危重症患者的ABCDE评估法:评估工具、依从性及报告结局的范围综述
Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 19;20:100763. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100763. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
A simulation-based randomized trial of ABCDE style cognitive aid for emergency medical services CHecklist In Prehospital Settings: the CHIPS-study.基于模拟的 ABCDE 式认知辅助在急诊医疗服务 CHecklist 在院前环境中的随机试验:CHIPS 研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 17;31(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01144-3.
6
Healthcare professionals' knowledge of the systematic ABCDE approach: a cross-sectional study.医护人员对系统性 ABCDE 法的了解:一项横断面研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00753-y.
7
Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach.采用气道、呼吸、循环、残疾、暴露(ABCDE)方法进行初步评估和治疗。
Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:117-21. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S28478. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
8
First-line attitudes in acute medicine.急性医学中的一线态度。
B-ENT. 2016;Suppl 26(1):31-39.
9
ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment - development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study.ABCDE 认知辅助工具在患者评估中的应用 - 一项多中心模拟研究中的开发和验证。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3.
10
ABCDE approach to victims by lifeguards: How do they manage a critical patient? A cross sectional simulation study.救生员对受害者的 ABCDE 方法:他们如何管理重症患者?一项横断面模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 30;14(4):e0212080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212080. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The ABCDE approach in critically ill patients: A scoping review of assessment tools, adherence and reported outcomes.危重症患者的ABCDE评估法:评估工具、依从性及报告结局的范围综述
Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 19;20:100763. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100763. eCollection 2024 Dec.