• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于理论的干预措施降低联络中心久坐行为的混合方法评估 - 站立健康阶梯式可行性研究。

A mixed method evaluation of a theory based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres- the stand up for health stepped wedge feasibility study.

机构信息

Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0293602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293602. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293602
PMID:38100490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10723690/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Contact centres have higher levels of sedentary behaviour than other office-based workplaces. Stand Up for Health (SUH) is a theory-based intervention developed using the 6SQuID framework to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centre workers. The aim of this study was to test acceptability and feasibility of implementing SUH in UK contact centres.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 2020-2022 (pre COVID and during lockdown) and used a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial design including a process evaluation. The intervention included working with contact centre managers to develop and implement a customised action plan aligning with SUH's theory of change. Workplace sedentary time, measured using activPAL™ devices, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included productivity, mental wellbeing, musculoskeletal health and physical activity. Empirical estimates of between-centre standard deviation and within-centre standard deviation of outcomes from pre-lockdown data were calculated to inform sample size calculations for future trials. The process evaluation adopted the RE-AIM framework to understand acceptability and feasibility of implementing the intervention. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with contact centre employees and managers, and activity preferences were collected using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 11 contact centres participated: 155 employees from 6 centres in the pre-lockdown data collection, and 54 employees from 5 centres post-lockdown. Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 33 employees and managers, and 96 participants completed an intervention activity preference questionnaire. Overall, the intervention was perceived as acceptable and feasible to deliver. Most centres implemented several intervention activities aligned with SUH's theory of change and over 50% of staff participated in at least one activity (pre-lockdown period). Perceived benefits including reduced sedentary behaviour, increased physical activity, and improved staff morale and mood were reported by contact centre employees and managers.

CONCLUSIONS

SUH demonstrates potential as an appealing and acceptable intervention, impacting several wellbeing outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered on the ISRCTNdatabase: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11580369.

摘要

简介

与其他基于办公室的工作场所相比,联络中心的久坐行为水平更高。“站起来为健康(Stand Up for Health,SUH)”是一种基于理论的干预措施,是使用 6SQuID 框架开发的,旨在减少联络中心工作人员的久坐行为。本研究的目的是测试在英国联络中心实施 SUH 的可接受性和可行性。

方法

该研究于 2020-2022 年进行(在 COVID 之前和封锁期间),采用了一个逐步楔形集群随机试验设计,包括一个过程评估。该干预措施包括与联络中心经理合作,制定并实施符合 SUH 变革理论的定制行动计划。使用 activPAL™设备测量的工作场所久坐时间是主要结果。次要结果包括生产力、心理健康、肌肉骨骼健康和身体活动。根据封锁前数据计算了中心间和中心内结果的经验估计标准差,为未来试验的样本量计算提供了信息。过程评估采用了 RE-AIM 框架,以了解实施干预措施的可接受性和可行性。对联络中心员工和经理进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论,并使用问卷收集了活动偏好。

结果

共有 11 家联络中心参与:6 家中心在封锁前数据收集期间有 155 名员工,5 家中心在封锁后有 54 名员工。对 33 名员工和经理进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论,96 名参与者完成了干预活动偏好问卷。总的来说,该干预措施被认为是可以接受和可行的。大多数中心实施了几项与 SUH 变革理论一致的干预活动,超过 50%的员工至少参加了一项活动(封锁前时期)。联络中心员工和经理报告了一些好处,包括减少久坐行为、增加身体活动以及提高员工士气和情绪。

结论

SUH 作为一种有吸引力和可接受的干预措施具有潜力,可以影响多个健康结果。

试验注册

该试验已在 ISRCTN 数据库注册:http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11580369。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/216f63060b4a/pone.0293602.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/b3990ae6b1fb/pone.0293602.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/1a9175d0ac65/pone.0293602.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/496c9331c755/pone.0293602.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/4d8803640fbe/pone.0293602.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/216f63060b4a/pone.0293602.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/b3990ae6b1fb/pone.0293602.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/1a9175d0ac65/pone.0293602.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/496c9331c755/pone.0293602.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/4d8803640fbe/pone.0293602.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/262c/10723690/216f63060b4a/pone.0293602.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A mixed method evaluation of a theory based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres- the stand up for health stepped wedge feasibility study.基于理论的干预措施降低联络中心久坐行为的混合方法评估 - 站立健康阶梯式可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0293602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293602. eCollection 2023.
2
Design, rationale and analysis plan for the Stand Up for Health trial in contact centres: a stepped wedge feasibility study.呼叫中心健康倡导试验的设计、原理及分析计划:一项阶梯楔形可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 23;6:139. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00683-1. eCollection 2020.
3
4
Stand Up for Health: Programme theory for an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres.站起来,为健康:一项干预措施的方案理论,旨在减少联络中心的久坐行为。
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Dec;89:102002. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102002. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study.一项在客服中心环境中减少久坐并增加活动量的多组分干预措施:一项可行性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6.
6
The "Worktivity" mHealth intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled pilot study.“Worktivity” 移动健康干预措施减少工作场所久坐行为:一项可行性聚类随机对照试验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;21(1):1416. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11473-6.
7
A Cluster-Randomised Crossover Pilot Feasibility Study of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Occupational Sedentary Behaviour in Professional Male Employees.多组分干预措施减少职业男性员工久坐行为的集群随机交叉先导可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179292.
8
"Why would you want to stand?" an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention.员工参与工作场所坐立桌干预的生活体验述评:为何要站立?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9.
9
Effectiveness of a healthcare-based mobile intervention on sedentary patterns, physical activity, mental well-being and clinical and productivity outcomes in office employees with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于医疗保健的移动干预对 2 型糖尿病办公室员工久坐模式、身体活动、心理健康以及临床和生产力结果的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;22(1):1269. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13676-x.
10
A behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐时间的行为改变干预措施:一项随机对照试验的方案。
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):182. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
What works to reduce sedentary behavior in the office, and could these intervention components transfer to the home working environment?: A rapid review and transferability appraisal.哪些方法有助于减少办公室久坐行为,这些干预措施能否应用于家庭办公环境?一项快速综述与可转移性评估
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jul 29;4:954639. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.954639. eCollection 2022.
2
Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis.肌肉骨骼疼痛与职业和非职业环境中的久坐行为:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Dec 13;18(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01191-y.
3
Stand Up for Health: Programme theory for an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres.
站起来,为健康:一项干预措施的方案理论,旨在减少联络中心的久坐行为。
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Dec;89:102002. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102002. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
4
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
5
Psychological ownership interventions increase interest in claiming government benefits.心理所有权干预措施增加了申领政府福利的兴趣。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106357118.
6
Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research.有效吸引和参与社区利益攸关方共同开展全球卫生研究。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n178.
7
Objective and subjective measurement of sedentary behavior in human adults: A toolkit.成人久坐行为的客观和主观测量:工具包。
Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Jan;34(1):e23546. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23546. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
8
New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets.新的全球成年人久坐行为与健康指南:拓宽行为目标。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01044-0.
9
Sit Less and Move More-A Multicomponent Intervention With and Without Height-Adjustable Workstations in Contact Center Call Agents: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.少坐多动——针对客服中心话务员开展的包含与不包含可调节高度工作站的多组分干预:一项试点随机对照试验
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan 1;63(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002066.
10
Design, rationale and analysis plan for the Stand Up for Health trial in contact centres: a stepped wedge feasibility study.呼叫中心健康倡导试验的设计、原理及分析计划:一项阶梯楔形可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 23;6:139. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00683-1. eCollection 2020.