Amazeen Michelle A, Krishna Arunima
College of Communication, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
College of Communication, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101774. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101774. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
With the proliferation of misinformation have come toolkits that include refutation strategies to target the beliefs of individuals that can be employed preemptively (prebunking) or reactively (debunking). Whereas the theoretical lineage of prebunking is well established within the literature on inoculation theory, the theoretical underpinning of debunking is not. Recent advances in inoculation theory include fostering resistance to a type of message rather than to the content of a message as well as application of messages in both prophylactic and therapeutic situations. Theoretically rooted within studies of conceptual change, fresh insights on debunking interventions derive from knowledge revision models, the Misinformation Receptivity Framework, as well as empirical evidence on the efficacy of narrative correctives and counters.
随着错误信息的扩散,出现了一些工具包,其中包括针对个人信念的反驳策略,这些策略可以先发制人地(预辟谣)或事后地(辟谣)加以运用。虽然预辟谣的理论渊源在关于接种理论的文献中已有充分确立,但辟谣的理论基础却并非如此。接种理论的最新进展包括培养对一类信息而非某一信息内容的抵抗力,以及在预防和治疗情境中应用信息。从理论上讲,辟谣干预措施的新见解源于概念转变研究、错误信息接受度框架,以及关于叙事纠正和反驳效果的实证证据。