• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases.错误信息的处理作为动机性和认知性偏差。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1430953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953. eCollection 2024.
2
Refuting misinformation: Examining theoretical underpinnings of refutational interventions.驳斥错误信息:审视反驳性干预措施的理论基础。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101774. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101774. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
3
A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.对隐含与明确错误信息进行预先驳斥和驳斥干预的比较。
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):591-607. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12551. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
4
The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.揭穿动态社交媒体对话中健康错误信息的挑战:COVID-19 期间公众戴口罩的在线随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):e34831. doi: 10.2196/34831.
5
Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.破除谣言:反驳错误信息的信息在心理功效方面的元分析
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1531-1546. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714579. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
6
The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking.新冠疫情错误信息泛滥:超越事实核查。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;48(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/1090198120980675. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
7
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
The role of political devotion in sharing partisan misinformation and resistance to fact-checking.政治投入在分享党派错误信息和抵制事实核查方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3116-3134. doi: 10.1037/xge0001436. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Timing matters when correcting fake news.纠正假新闻要把握时机。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 2;118(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020043118.
10
[Medical misinformation on social media: should it be corrected or not?].[社交媒体上的医学错误信息:是否应该纠正?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2022 Dec 14;166:D7254.

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling Item and Testing Effects in Inoculation Research on Online Misinformation: Solomon Revisited.厘清在线错误信息接种研究中的项目与测试效应:重访所罗门实验
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):340-362. doi: 10.1177/0013164420940378. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation.科学相关错误信息修正效果的元分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1514-1525. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Motivations for nutrition information-seeking behavior among Belgian adults: a qualitative study.动机比利时成年人营养信息搜索行为:定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;22(1):2432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14851-w.
4
Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.虚假新闻提醒和真实性标签对新闻标题的记忆和置信度准确性有不同的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 17;12(1):21829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25649-6.
5
Inoculation works and health advocacy backfires: Building resistance to COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in a low political trust context.接种工作与健康宣传适得其反:在政治信任度较低的背景下增强对新冠疫苗错误信息的抵抗力
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 25;13:976091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976091. eCollection 2022.
6
Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media.心理预接种可提高抵御社交媒体错误信息的恢复力。
Sci Adv. 2022 Aug 26;8(34):eabo6254. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.社会交际背景下政治两极分化的认知动机机制。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Online misinformation and vaccine hesitancy.网络错误信息与疫苗犹豫
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2194-2199. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab128.
9
Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation.量化假新闻对行为的影响:来自一项关于新冠疫情错误信息研究的证据。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):773-784. doi: 10.1037/xap0000371. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
Conservatives' susceptibility to political misperceptions.保守派人士对政治错误认知的易感性。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jun 2;7(23). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1234. Print 2021 Jun.

错误信息的处理作为动机性和认知性偏差。

Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases.

作者信息

Zhou Yanmengqian, Shen Lijiang

机构信息

Department of Communication, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1430953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953
PMID:39282675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11393549/
Abstract

Misinformation can be broadly defined as false or inaccurate information created and spread with or without clear intent to cause harm. It travels fast and deep and persists despite debunking. It is well-documented that corrective messages and fact-checking efforts often fail to mitigate the effects or persistence of misinformation. In this article, we examine the persistence of misinformation as rooted in motivational and cognitive biases in information processing. While drawing on the frameworks of motivations that drive information seeking, sharing, and processing and various cognitive biases, we explicate mechanisms and processes that underlie the impact and persistence of misinformation. We conclude our article by discussing the potential utility of psychological inoculation as a prebunking strategy.

摘要

错误信息可以被广义地定义为在有意或无意造成伤害的情况下产生和传播的虚假或不准确的信息。它传播迅速且深入,即便已被揭穿仍会持续存在。有充分的文献记载表明,纠正性信息和事实核查工作往往无法减轻错误信息的影响或其持续存在的情况。在本文中,我们探讨错误信息的持续存在是如何源于信息处理中的动机性和认知性偏差的。在借鉴驱动信息寻求、分享和处理的动机框架以及各种认知偏差的同时,我们阐述了错误信息产生影响和持续存在的机制及过程。我们通过讨论心理接种作为一种预揭穿策略的潜在效用,来结束本文。