Suppr超能文献

错误信息的处理作为动机性和认知性偏差。

Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases.

作者信息

Zhou Yanmengqian, Shen Lijiang

机构信息

Department of Communication, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1430953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Misinformation can be broadly defined as false or inaccurate information created and spread with or without clear intent to cause harm. It travels fast and deep and persists despite debunking. It is well-documented that corrective messages and fact-checking efforts often fail to mitigate the effects or persistence of misinformation. In this article, we examine the persistence of misinformation as rooted in motivational and cognitive biases in information processing. While drawing on the frameworks of motivations that drive information seeking, sharing, and processing and various cognitive biases, we explicate mechanisms and processes that underlie the impact and persistence of misinformation. We conclude our article by discussing the potential utility of psychological inoculation as a prebunking strategy.

摘要

错误信息可以被广义地定义为在有意或无意造成伤害的情况下产生和传播的虚假或不准确的信息。它传播迅速且深入,即便已被揭穿仍会持续存在。有充分的文献记载表明,纠正性信息和事实核查工作往往无法减轻错误信息的影响或其持续存在的情况。在本文中,我们探讨错误信息的持续存在是如何源于信息处理中的动机性和认知性偏差的。在借鉴驱动信息寻求、分享和处理的动机框架以及各种认知偏差的同时,我们阐述了错误信息产生影响和持续存在的机制及过程。我们通过讨论心理接种作为一种预揭穿策略的潜在效用,来结束本文。

相似文献

1
Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1430953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953. eCollection 2024.
2
Refuting misinformation: Examining theoretical underpinnings of refutational interventions.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101774. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101774. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
3
A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):591-607. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12551. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1531-1546. doi: 10.1177/0956797617714579. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
6
The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking.
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;48(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/1090198120980675. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
7
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
The role of political devotion in sharing partisan misinformation and resistance to fact-checking.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3116-3134. doi: 10.1037/xge0001436. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Timing matters when correcting fake news.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 2;118(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020043118.

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling Item and Testing Effects in Inoculation Research on Online Misinformation: Solomon Revisited.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):340-362. doi: 10.1177/0013164420940378. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation.
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1514-1525. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Motivations for nutrition information-seeking behavior among Belgian adults: a qualitative study.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;22(1):2432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14851-w.
6
Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media.
Sci Adv. 2022 Aug 26;8(34):eabo6254. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Online misinformation and vaccine hesitancy.
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2194-2199. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab128.
9
Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):773-784. doi: 10.1037/xap0000371. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
10
Conservatives' susceptibility to political misperceptions.
Sci Adv. 2021 Jun 2;7(23). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1234. Print 2021 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验