William Harvey Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Department of Dietetics, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 15;14(1):8345. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42659-8.
Bioenergetic failure caused by impaired utilisation of glucose and fatty acids contributes to organ dysfunction across multiple tissues in critical illness. Ketone bodies may form an alternative substrate source, but the feasibility and safety of inducing a ketogenic state in physiologically unstable patients is not known. Twenty-nine mechanically ventilated adults with multi-organ failure managed on intensive care units were randomised (Ketogenic n = 14, Control n = 15) into a two-centre pilot open-label trial of ketogenic versus standard enteral feeding. The primary endpoints were assessment of feasibility and safety, recruitment and retention rates and achievement of ketosis and glucose control. Ketogenic feeding was feasible, safe, well tolerated and resulted in ketosis in all patients in the intervention group, with a refusal rate of 4.1% and 82.8% retention. Patients who received ketogenic feeding had fewer hypoglycaemic events (0.0% vs. 1.6%), required less exogenous international units of insulin (0 (Interquartile range 0-16) vs.78 (Interquartile range 0-412) but had slightly more daily episodes of diarrhoea (53.5% vs. 42.9%) over the trial period. Ketogenic feeding was feasible and may be an intervention for addressing bioenergetic failure in critically ill patients. Clinical Trials.gov registration: NCT04101071.
生物能量衰竭是由葡萄糖和脂肪酸利用受损引起的,会导致危重病患者多个组织器官功能障碍。酮体可能形成替代底物来源,但在生理不稳定的患者中诱导生酮状态的可行性和安全性尚不清楚。在重症监护病房接受机械通气的 29 名多器官衰竭的成年人,按照随机(生酮组 n=14,对照组 n=15)、双中心、开放标签试验,接受生酮与标准肠内喂养的比较。主要终点是评估可行性和安全性、招募和保留率以及酮症和血糖控制的实现。生酮喂养是可行的、安全的、耐受良好的,所有干预组患者均出现酮症,拒绝率为 4.1%,保留率为 82.8%。接受生酮喂养的患者低血糖事件更少(0.0% vs. 1.6%),需要的外源性胰岛素国际单位更少(0(四分位间距 0-16) vs. 78(四分位间距 0-412),但试验期间每天腹泻发作次数略多(53.5% vs. 42.9%)。生酮喂养是可行的,可能是治疗危重病患者生物能量衰竭的一种干预措施。临床试验注册:NCT04101071。