Suppr超能文献

自截断采样比描述性频率信息产生更适中的共变判断和相关决策:回归频率估计的作用。

Self-truncated sampling produces more moderate covariation judgment and related decision than descriptive frequency information: The role of regressive frequency estimation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):201-215. doi: 10.1002/pchj.703. Epub 2023 Dec 17.

Abstract

Covariation judgment underlies a diversity of psychological theories and influences various everyday decisions. Information about covariation can be learned from either a summary description of frequencies (i.e., contingency tables) or trial-by-trial experience (i.e., sampling individual instances). Two studies were conducted to investigate the impact of information learning mode (i.e., description vs. self-truncated sampling) on covariation judgment and related decision. In each trial under the description condition, participants were presented with a contingency table with explicit cell frequencies, whereas in each trial under the self-truncated sampling condition, participants were allowed to determine when to stop sampling instances and thus the actual sample size. To eliminate sampling error, an other-yoked (i.e., between-subject) design was used in this research so that cell frequencies shown in a trial under the description condition were matched with those experienced in a trial under the self-truncated sampling condition. Experiment 1 showed that the self-truncated sampling condition led to more moderate covariation judgments than the description condition (i.e., a description-experience gap). Experiment 2 demonstrated further that the same gap extended to covariation-related decisions in terms of relative contingent preference (RCP). Regressive frequency estimation under self-truncated sampling appeared to underlie the consistent gaps found in the two studies, whereas the impact of regressive diagnosticity (i.e., the same sample of instances was viewed as less diagnostic under description than under self-truncated sampling) or simultaneous overestimation and underweighting of rare instances under experience was not supported by the observed data. Future research might examine alternative accounts of the observed gaps, such as the impacts of belief updating and stopping rule under self-truncated sampling.

摘要

共变判断是多种心理学理论的基础,并且影响着各种日常决策。关于共变的信息可以从频率的概要描述(即列联表)或逐次试验经验(即抽样个体实例)中学习。进行了两项研究,以调查信息学习模式(即描述与自我截断抽样)对共变判断和相关决策的影响。在描述条件下的每一次试验中,参与者都会看到一个明确的单元格频率的列联表,而在自我截断抽样条件下的每一次试验中,参与者可以确定何时停止抽样实例,从而确定实际的样本大小。为了消除抽样误差,本研究采用了其他配对(即被试间)设计,使得在描述条件下的一次试验中显示的单元格频率与在自我截断抽样条件下的一次试验中经历的频率相匹配。实验 1 表明,自我截断抽样条件导致的共变判断比描述条件更为适中(即描述-经验差距)。实验 2 进一步表明,相同的差距扩展到了共变相关决策的相对偶然性偏好(RCP)。自我截断抽样下的回归频率估计似乎是导致这两项研究中一致差距的基础,而回归诊断性(即描述条件下同一实例样本被认为不如自我截断抽样条件下具有诊断性)或经验下稀有实例的同时过度估计和低估的影响则与观察到的数据不一致。未来的研究可能会检验观察到的差距的替代解释,例如自我截断抽样下的信念更新和停止规则的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaa2/10990818/65a29efe4c35/PCHJ-13-201-g007.jpg

相似文献

3
Judgement frequency, belief revision, and serial processing of causal information.
Q J Exp Psychol B. 2002 Jul;55(3):267-81. doi: 10.1080/02724990244000007.
4
The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):389-399. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01084-8.
6
Strategy selection in causal reasoning: when beliefs and covariation collide.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Mar;54(1):15-32. doi: 10.1037/h0087327.
7
Dissociation between judgments and outcome-expectancy measures in covariation learning: a signal detection theory approach.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1105-20. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1105.
8
The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
Cogn Process. 2016 Nov;17(4):399-413. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0770-9. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1482-94. doi: 10.1037/a0013509.
10
Rational inference strategies and the genesis of polarization and extremism.
Sci Rep. 2022 May 5;12(1):7344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11389-0.

本文引用的文献

2
Pseudocontingency inference and choice: The role of information sampling.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1624-1644. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000840. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
3
Simultaneous underweighting and overestimation of rare events: Unpacking a paradox.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Dec;148(12):2207-2217. doi: 10.1037/xge0000603. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Towards a deeper understanding of impression formation-New insights gained from a cognitive-ecological perspective.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;115(3):379-397. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000123. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
5
A meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap.
Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;144(2):140-176. doi: 10.1037/bul0000115. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Bayesian data analysis for newcomers.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):155-177. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1.
7
Statistical numeracy as a moderator of (pseudo)contingency effects on decision behavior.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Mar;174:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
Modeling valuations from experience: A comment on Ashby and Rakow (2014).
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):158-66. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000165.
10
Pseudocontingencies derived from categorically organized memory representations.
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1185-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0331-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验