Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):201-215. doi: 10.1002/pchj.703. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
Covariation judgment underlies a diversity of psychological theories and influences various everyday decisions. Information about covariation can be learned from either a summary description of frequencies (i.e., contingency tables) or trial-by-trial experience (i.e., sampling individual instances). Two studies were conducted to investigate the impact of information learning mode (i.e., description vs. self-truncated sampling) on covariation judgment and related decision. In each trial under the description condition, participants were presented with a contingency table with explicit cell frequencies, whereas in each trial under the self-truncated sampling condition, participants were allowed to determine when to stop sampling instances and thus the actual sample size. To eliminate sampling error, an other-yoked (i.e., between-subject) design was used in this research so that cell frequencies shown in a trial under the description condition were matched with those experienced in a trial under the self-truncated sampling condition. Experiment 1 showed that the self-truncated sampling condition led to more moderate covariation judgments than the description condition (i.e., a description-experience gap). Experiment 2 demonstrated further that the same gap extended to covariation-related decisions in terms of relative contingent preference (RCP). Regressive frequency estimation under self-truncated sampling appeared to underlie the consistent gaps found in the two studies, whereas the impact of regressive diagnosticity (i.e., the same sample of instances was viewed as less diagnostic under description than under self-truncated sampling) or simultaneous overestimation and underweighting of rare instances under experience was not supported by the observed data. Future research might examine alternative accounts of the observed gaps, such as the impacts of belief updating and stopping rule under self-truncated sampling.
共变判断是多种心理学理论的基础,并且影响着各种日常决策。关于共变的信息可以从频率的概要描述(即列联表)或逐次试验经验(即抽样个体实例)中学习。进行了两项研究,以调查信息学习模式(即描述与自我截断抽样)对共变判断和相关决策的影响。在描述条件下的每一次试验中,参与者都会看到一个明确的单元格频率的列联表,而在自我截断抽样条件下的每一次试验中,参与者可以确定何时停止抽样实例,从而确定实际的样本大小。为了消除抽样误差,本研究采用了其他配对(即被试间)设计,使得在描述条件下的一次试验中显示的单元格频率与在自我截断抽样条件下的一次试验中经历的频率相匹配。实验 1 表明,自我截断抽样条件导致的共变判断比描述条件更为适中(即描述-经验差距)。实验 2 进一步表明,相同的差距扩展到了共变相关决策的相对偶然性偏好(RCP)。自我截断抽样下的回归频率估计似乎是导致这两项研究中一致差距的基础,而回归诊断性(即描述条件下同一实例样本被认为不如自我截断抽样条件下具有诊断性)或经验下稀有实例的同时过度估计和低估的影响则与观察到的数据不一致。未来的研究可能会检验观察到的差距的替代解释,例如自我截断抽样下的信念更新和停止规则的影响。