• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数量素养和呈现形式对关联判断的影响。

The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, KT1 2EE, UK.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):389-399. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01084-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-020-01084-8
PMID:32851568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7886725/
Abstract

Covariation information can be used to infer whether a causal link plausibly exists between two dichotomous variables, and such judgments of contingency are central to many critical and everyday decisions. However, individuals do not always interpret and integrate covariation information effectively, an issue that may be compounded by limited numeracy skills, and they often resort to the use of heuristics, which can result in inaccurate judgments. This experiment investigated whether presenting covariation information in a composite bar chart increased accuracy of contingency judgments, and whether it can mitigate errors driven by low numeracy skills. Participants completed an online questionnaire, which consisted of an 11-item numeracy scale and three covariation problems that varied in level of difficulty, involving a fictitious fertilizer and its impact on whether a plant bloomed or not. Half received summary covariation information in a composite bar chart, and half in a 2 × 2 matrix that summarized event frequencies. Viewing the composite bar charts increased accuracy of individuals both high and low in numeracy, regardless of problem difficulty, resulted in more consistent judgments that were closer to the normatively correct value, and increased the likelihood of detecting the correct direction of association. Findings are consistent with prior work, suggesting that composite bar charts are an effective way to improve covariation judgment and have potential for use in the domain of health risk communication.

摘要

共变信息可用于推断两个二分变量之间是否存在因果关系,而这种对关联的判断是许多关键和日常决策的核心。然而,个体并不总是能够有效地解释和整合共变信息,这个问题可能会因为有限的计算能力而变得更加复杂,并且他们经常诉诸启发式方法,这可能导致不准确的判断。本实验研究了在复合条形图中呈现共变信息是否会提高关联判断的准确性,以及它是否可以减轻由低计算能力技能驱动的错误。参与者完成了一个在线问卷,其中包括一个 11 项的计算能力量表和三个共变问题,难度不同,涉及一种虚构的肥料及其对植物是否开花的影响。一半的参与者在复合条形图中收到了总结性的共变信息,另一半在总结事件频率的 2×2 矩阵中收到了信息。无论问题的难度如何,查看复合条形图都提高了高计算能力和低计算能力个体的准确性,使判断更加一致,更接近规范正确的值,并增加了检测正确关联方向的可能性。这些发现与先前的工作一致,表明复合条形图是一种改进共变判断的有效方法,并且有可能在健康风险沟通领域得到应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/5d43d95e03c2/13421_2020_1084_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/6a9b458389eb/13421_2020_1084_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/d0da49de738a/13421_2020_1084_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/976723261946/13421_2020_1084_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/5d43d95e03c2/13421_2020_1084_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/6a9b458389eb/13421_2020_1084_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/d0da49de738a/13421_2020_1084_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/976723261946/13421_2020_1084_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2d/7886725/5d43d95e03c2/13421_2020_1084_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of numeracy and presentation format on judgments of contingency.数量素养和呈现形式对关联判断的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Feb;49(2):389-399. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01084-8.
2
Self-truncated sampling produces more moderate covariation judgment and related decision than descriptive frequency information: The role of regressive frequency estimation.自截断采样比描述性频率信息产生更适中的共变判断和相关决策:回归频率估计的作用。
Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):201-215. doi: 10.1002/pchj.703. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
3
Money matters (especially if you are good at math): Numeracy, verbal intelligence, education, and income in satisfaction judgments.金钱很重要(尤其是如果你擅长数学):计算能力、语言智力、教育程度和收入会影响满意度判断。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 24;16(11):e0259331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259331. eCollection 2021.
4
The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy.算术能力对放射治疗后前列腺癌复发纵向风险的逐字知识的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):27-36. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551639. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.家庭护理护士的计算能力和图表读写能力对理解视觉显示信息的影响:对仪表板设计的启示。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):175-182. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx042.
6
When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy.频率在何时以及对谁而言有助于表现?论数字素养的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2343-68. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.687004. Epub 2012 May 25.
7
The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.相关原因数量对因果推理中协变信息加工的影响。
Cogn Process. 2016 Nov;17(4):399-413. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0770-9. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
8
Strategy selection in causal reasoning: when beliefs and covariation collide.因果推理中的策略选择:信念与共变冲突之时
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Mar;54(1):15-32. doi: 10.1037/h0087327.
9
Towards an understanding of adult judgments of synergistic health benefits.迈向对成人对协同健康益处判断的理解。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;21(1):204-23. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12158. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
10
Sample representativeness affects whether judgments are influenced by base rate or sample size.样本代表性会影响判断是否受基础概率或样本大小的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Mar;142(3):370-82. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Health Literacy in the Workplace Among Civil Servants: Cross-Sectional Study.促进公务员工作场所健康素养:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 15;10:e58942. doi: 10.2196/58942.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach.一种简化算术量表的开发与测试:拉施分析方法
J Behav Decis Mak. 2013 Apr;26(2):198-212. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1751. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
2
Asking better questions: How presentation formats influence information search.提出更好的问题:呈现形式如何影响信息搜索。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Aug;43(8):1274-1297. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000374. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
3
Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.
设计促进风险素养的视觉辅助工具:健康研究与循证设计启发法的系统综述
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):582-627. doi: 10.1177/0018720817690634. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.帮助医生和患者理解健康统计数据。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007 Nov;8(2):53-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
5
Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction.互动促进了无需指导的贝叶斯推理。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):581-603. doi: 10.1037/a0039161.
6
Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect?图标数组是否有助于减少分母忽视?
Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):672-84. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10369000. Epub 2010 May 18.
7
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.计算能力如何影响风险理解和医疗决策。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73. doi: 10.1037/a0017327.
8
Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.使用图标阵列传达医疗风险:克服低数字素养问题。
Health Psychol. 2009 Mar;28(2):210-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014474.
9
Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.在他莫昔芬预防决策辅助工具中传达副作用风险:象形图的去偏影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.010.
10
Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations.传达健康风险的数字、文字和视觉形式:建议的最佳实践及未来建议。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):696-713. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307271. Epub 2007 Sep 14.