Lin JiaHua, Duan XiaoHan, Wen YanLin, Zhang Jiao, Zou YiHui
Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
Acta Otolaryngol. 2023 Nov;143(sup1):S34-S38. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2023.2278712. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
In pure tone audiometry, when the difference of the Average Air Conduction Threshold of pure tone (AACT) between bilateral ears is more than 40 dB HL masking must be performed on the poor side, However, we found that masking also make significance difference when the binaural AACT difference (AACT-d)was less than 40 dB HL in some patients.
AIMS/OBJECTIVE: Assessing the significance of masking for the poor ear in pure tone audiometry in patients with different types of deafness to obtain preoperative accurate hearing.
A comparative analysis of 163 cases (163 ears) with hearing difference between two ears was conducted, who were divided into three groups: G1 Congenital Malformation of the Middle and Outer Ear (CMMOE)as conductive deafness, 63 ears, G2 sudden deafness as sensorineural deafness, 65 ears, and G3 media otitis as conductive or mixed deafness,35 ears. AACT-d before and after the poor ear masking was analyzed under the following three conditions: (1) 0.125-8 KHz each frequency, (2) 0.5-4 KHz on average, (3) the frequencies of AACT-d ≥ 40 dB HL and <40 dB HL between the two ears before masking. If the sample data did not follow a normal distribution, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparasion of AACT, and < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. It is clinically effective for AACT-d ≥ 15 dB HL at 1 frequency or 10 dB HL ≤ AACT-d at 2 frequencies <15 dB HL before and after masking.
Among the three groups, (1) the comparasion of AACT-d before and after the poor ear masking for each frequency of 0.125-8 KHz and 0.5-4 KHz on average with all < 0.05, and the AACT-d of the G1 group was the largest, with an average 0.5-4KHz of 7.5 dB HL, and the first two were 14.5 dB HL and 13.8 dB HL at 0.125 KHz and 0.25 KHz, respectively. (2) AACT-d ≥ 40 dB HL and <40 dB HL between the two ears before masking were distributed at the full frequency of 0.125-8KHz, the clinically effective rates of ≥40 dB HL groups were G1 (89.3%), G2 (45.5%) and G3 (5.3%), while those of < 40 dB HL groups were G1 (69.7%), G2 (34.4%) and G3 (31.3%), respectively.
For all three groups, there was statistically significant in AACT-d before and after the poor ear masking across each frequency of 0.125-8 KHz and on average 0.5-4 KHz. The distribution of AACT-d ≥ 40 dB HL and <40 dB HL between the two ears before masking was observed throughout the full frequency range of 0.125-8 KHz. AACT-d before and after the poor ear masking showed clinical effectiveness in all three groups, with the highest effective rate observed in the G1 group and the highest AACT-d at 0.125 KHz and 0.25 KHz. Therefore, regardless of whether the AACT-d between the two ears before masking is ≥40 dB HL or <40 dB HL, the full frequency masking should be employed in three groups, especially for the G1 group of CMMOE, particularly at 0.125 KHz and 0.25 KHz.
在纯音听力测试中,当双耳纯音平均气导阈值(AACT)之差大于40dB HL时,必须对听力较差的一侧进行掩蔽。然而,我们发现,在一些患者中,当双耳AACT差值(AACT-d)小于40dB HL时,掩蔽也会产生显著差异。
评估不同类型耳聋患者在纯音听力测试中对听力较差耳进行掩蔽以获得术前准确听力的意义。
对163例(163耳)双耳听力有差异的患者进行比较分析,将其分为三组:G1组为中耳和外耳先天性畸形(CMMOE)导致的传导性耳聋,共63耳;G2组为突发性耳聋导致的感音神经性耳聋,共65耳;G3组为中耳炎导致的传导性或混合性耳聋,共35耳。分析听力较差耳掩蔽前后的AACT-d,条件如下:(1)0.125 - 8kHz各频率;(2)平均0.5 - 4kHz;(3)掩蔽前双耳AACT-d≥40dB HL和<40dB HL的频率。若样本数据不服从正态分布,则采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较AACT,P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。掩蔽前后,在1个频率处AACT-d≥15dB HL或在2个频率处10dB HL≤AACT-d<15dB HL为临床有效。
三组中,(1)听力较差耳掩蔽前后,0.125 - 8kHz各频率及平均0.5 - 4kHz的AACT-d比较,P均<0.05,G1组AACT-d最大,平均0.5 - 4kHz为7.5dB HL,0.125kHz和0.25kHz处前两位分别为14.5dB HL和13.8dB HL。(2)掩蔽前双耳AACT-d≥40dB HL和<40dB HL在0.125 - 8kHz全频率分布,≥40dB HL组临床有效率G1组为89.3%,G2组为45.5%,G3组为5.3%;<40dB HL组临床有效率G1组为69.7%,G2组为34.4%,G3组为31.3%。
对于所有三组,在0.125 - 8kHz各频率及平均0.5 - 4kHz处,听力较差耳掩蔽前后AACT-d有统计学差异。掩蔽前双耳AACT-d≥40dB HL和<40dB HL在0.125 - 8kHz全频率范围均有分布。听力较差耳掩蔽前后AACT-d在三组中均显示出临床有效性,G1组有效率最高,0.125kHz和0.25kHz处AACT-d最大。因此,无论掩蔽前双耳AACT-d≥40dB HL或<40dB HL,三组均应采用全频率掩蔽,尤其是G1组CMMOE患者,在0.125kHz和0.25kHz处尤为重要。