Infection Biology Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Cell Death Dis. 2023 Dec 18;14(12):838. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-06374-y.
Acute infection and chronic infection are the two most common fates of pathogenic virus infections. While several factors that contribute to these fates are described, the critical control points and the mechanisms that underlie infection fate regulation are incompletely understood. Using the acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection model of mice, we find that the early dynamic pattern of the IFN-I response is a differentiating trait between both infection fates. Acute-infected mice generate a 2-wave IFN-I response while chronic-infected mice generate only a 1-wave response. The underlying cause is a temporal difference in CD8 T cell-mediated killing of splenic marginal zone CD169+ macrophages. It occurs later in acute infection and thus enables CD169+ marginal zone macrophages to produce the 2nd IFN-I wave. This is required for subsequent immune events including induction of inflammatory macrophages, generation of effector CD8+ T cells and virus clearance. Importantly, these benefits come at a cost for the host in the form of spleen fibrosis. Due to an earlier marginal zone destruction, these ordered immune events are deregulated in chronic infection. Our findings demonstrate the critical importance of kinetically well-coordinated sequential immune events for acute infection control and highlights that it may come at a cost for the host organism.
急性感染和慢性感染是病原病毒感染的两种最常见结局。虽然描述了导致这些结局的几个因素,但感染结局调节的关键控制点和机制尚不完全清楚。使用急性和慢性淋巴细胞脉络丛脑膜炎病毒 (LCMV) 感染小鼠模型,我们发现 IFN-I 反应的早期动态模式是两种感染结局的区别特征。急性感染小鼠产生 2 波 IFN-I 反应,而慢性感染小鼠仅产生 1 波反应。其根本原因是 CD8 T 细胞介导的脾边缘区 CD169+巨噬细胞杀伤的时间差异。它在急性感染中发生得更晚,从而使 CD169+边缘区巨噬细胞产生第 2 波 IFN-I。这对于随后的免疫事件包括诱导炎症性巨噬细胞、产生效应性 CD8+T 细胞和清除病毒是必需的。重要的是,这些益处以脾脏纤维化的形式给宿主带来了代价。由于边缘区较早破坏,这些有序的免疫事件在慢性感染中失调。我们的研究结果表明,动态协调的顺序免疫事件对于急性感染控制至关重要,并强调这可能对宿主生物体造成代价。