• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗓音障碍治疗中声学嗓音质量指数的最小临床重要差异。

The Minimal Important Difference of Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Treatment of Voice Disorders.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2024 Jun;134(6):2805-2811. doi: 10.1002/lary.31230. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1002/lary.31230
PMID:38112338
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a reliable tool that objectively assesses dysphonia levels using six acoustic parameters. Despite its high criterion-related concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and minimal detectable change derived from test-retest reliability, the minimal important difference (MID) of the AVQI has not been tested before. This study aimed to estimate the MIDs of AVQI for improvement audibly perceived by clinicians and self-reported improvement by patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients who received treatment for voice disorders. Patients completed AVQI and Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) questionnaires before and after the therapy. The MIDs of the AVQI were estimated using the anchor of either auditory-perceptual judgment of total dysphonia levels by clinicians or the VHI-10 questionnaire by patients. A distribution-based approach was also used to complement the results.

RESULTS

First, using the auditory-perceptual anchor, a decrease of 0.95 in the AVQI was estimated as the MID for clinicians' perception, as a result of the receiver operating curve. Then, using the patient-reported anchor, an improvement of 1.36 in the AVQI was estimated as the MID for patients' voice-related disability. The distribution-based approach also ensured the anchor-based results of both the MIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The AVQI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating voice quality, and a 0.95 decrease in the AVQI represents a meaningful improvement for clinicians' perception, whereas a 1.36 decrease in the AVQI influences patients' self-reported disability. This study contributes to understanding the minimal change necessary for clinicians to make informed decisions and ensure patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:2805-2811, 2024.

摘要

目的

声学语音质量指数(AVQI)是一种可靠的工具,它使用六个声学参数客观评估嗓音障碍程度。尽管其具有高的准则相关的同时效度、诊断准确性和源于重测信度的最小可检测变化,但 AVQI 的最小临床重要差异(MID)尚未得到测试。本研究旨在估计 AVQI 的 MID,这些 MID 可被临床医生察觉到的改善以及患者报告的改善。

方法

对 110 名接受嗓音障碍治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。患者在治疗前后完成了 AVQI 和嗓音障碍指数 10 (VHI-10)问卷。使用临床医生对总嗓音障碍程度的听觉感知判断或患者的 VHI-10 问卷作为锚定物来估计 AVQI 的 MID。还使用基于分布的方法来补充结果。

结果

首先,使用听觉感知锚定物,根据接收器操作曲线,AVQI 下降 0.95 被估计为临床医生感知的 MID。然后,使用患者报告的锚定物,AVQI 提高 1.36 被估计为患者与嗓音相关的残疾的 MID。基于分布的方法也保证了这两个 MID 的锚定结果。

结论

AVQI 是一种评估嗓音质量的可靠和有效的工具,AVQI 降低 0.95 代表了临床医生感知的有意义的改善,而 AVQI 降低 1.36 则影响了患者的自我报告残疾。本研究有助于理解临床医生做出决策和确保患者满意度所需的最小变化。

证据水平

3 级喉镜,134:2805-2811,2024。

相似文献

1
The Minimal Important Difference of Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Treatment of Voice Disorders.嗓音障碍治疗中声学嗓音质量指数的最小临床重要差异。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jun;134(6):2805-2811. doi: 10.1002/lary.31230. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index.《嗓音障碍指数(第 03.01 版)》,法语版和《嗓音障碍指数》。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e1-646.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
4
Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.探索声学测量和其他语音评估的有效性。
J Voice. 2024 May;38(3):567-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.12.014. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.日语中声学嗓音质量指数的验证
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):260.e1-260.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
7
Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.声学语音质量指数作为一种潜在的语音筛查工具。
J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.两种嗓音障碍严重程度多参数声学指标的比较:嗓音声学质量指数和嗓音障碍的谐波倒谱谱指数
J Voice. 2018 Jul;32(4):515.e1-515.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
10
The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.芬兰语人群中的声学语音质量指数第 02.02 版。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2020 Jul;45(2):49-56. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2018.1556332. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracheoesophageal Voicing Following Resistance-Based Dysphagia Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Multidimensional Assessment.基于阻力的吞咽障碍康复后的气管食管发音:一项探索性多维评估
Head Neck. 2025 Aug;47(8):2209-2222. doi: 10.1002/hed.28136. Epub 2025 Mar 25.