From the Departments of Radiology (O.T.H., S.C.B., M.A.O., H.H.C.), Pathology (R.M.G.), Interventional Radiology (N.F.), and Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (N.M.), University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Rm S257, San Francisco, CA 94143; and Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.).
Radiology. 2023 Dec;309(3):e222776. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222776.
Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is a high-specificity, lower-sensitivity grading system to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and recurrence after local-regional therapy. However, the emphasis on specificity can result in disease understaging, potentially leading to poorer posttransplant outcomes. Purpose To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of pretransplant CT and MRI assessment for viable HCC on a per-patient basis using the LI-RADS TRA, considering explant pathology as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Patient records from 218 consecutive adult patients from a single institution with HCC who underwent liver transplant from January 2011 to November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Two readers blinded to the original report reviewed immediate (within 90 days) pretransplant imaging and characterized observations according to the LI-RADS TRA. Based on this, patients with LR-4, LR-5, or LR-TR (treatment response) viable tumors were designated as viable tumor; patients with solely LR-3 or LR-TR equivocal tumors were designated as equivocal; and patients with only LR-TR nonviable lesions were designated as no viable disease. Patients were designated as within or outside the Milan criteria. These per-patient designations were compared with the presence of viable disease at explant pathology. Fisher exact test was used to compare the differences between CT and MRI. Weighted κ values were used to calculate interreader reliability. Results Final study sample consisted of 206 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 57-65 years]; 157 male patients and 49 female patients). Per-patient LI-RADS TRA assessment of pretransplant imaging had an NPV of 32% (95% CI: 27, 38) and 26% (95% CI: 20, 33) (readers 1 and 2, respectively) for predicting viable disease. Seventy-five percent (reader 1) and 77% (reader 2) of patients deemed equivocal had residual tumors at explant pathology. Weighted interreader reliability was substantial (κ = 0.62). Conclusion Patient-based stratification of viable, equivocal, and nonviable disease at pretransplant CT or MRI, based on LI-RADS TRA, demonstrated low negative predictive value in excluding HCC at explant pathology. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Tamir and Tau in this issue.
肝脏影像报告和数据系统 2018 版(LI-RADS)治疗反应算法(TRA)是一种高特异性、低敏感性的分级系统,用于诊断肝细胞癌(HCC)和局部区域治疗后的复发。然而,对特异性的强调可能导致疾病分期不足,从而导致移植后结局较差。目的:使用 LI-RADS TRA 基于每位患者确定 CT 和 MRI 评估对移植前 HCC 有活力的阴性预测值(NPV),并将肝移植标本病理作为参考标准。材料与方法:回顾性分析了 2011 年 1 月至 2017 年 11 月在一家机构接受 HCC 肝移植的 218 例连续成年患者的患者记录。两名读者在不知道原始报告的情况下,对即刻(90 天内)移植前影像学检查进行了回顾,并根据 LI-RADS TRA 对观察结果进行了描述。根据这一结果,LR-4、LR-5 或 LR-TR(治疗反应)有活力肿瘤的患者被指定为有活力肿瘤;仅 LR-3 或 LR-TR 不确定肿瘤的患者被指定为不确定;仅 LR-TR 无活力病变的患者被指定为无活力疾病。患者被指定为符合或不符合米兰标准。每位患者的这些指定与移植标本病理中存在有活力疾病进行了比较。采用 Fisher 精确检验比较 CT 和 MRI 之间的差异。使用加权 κ 值计算读者间的可靠性。结果:最终研究样本包括 206 例患者(中位年龄 61 岁[IQR,57-65 岁];157 例男性和 49 例女性)。基于每位患者的 LI-RADS TRA 评估,移植前影像学检查对预测有活力疾病的 NPV 为 32%(95%CI:27,38)和 26%(95%CI:20,33)(读者 1 和 2)。75%(读者 1)和 77%(读者 2)的有不确定肿瘤的患者在移植标本病理中仍有肿瘤残留。读者间的加权可靠性为中等(κ=0.62)。结论:基于 LI-RADS TRA,在移植前 CT 或 MRI 上对有活力、不确定和无活力疾病进行患者分层,对肝移植标本病理中排除 HCC 的阴性预测值较低。