• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018版LI-RADS CT治疗反应算法在单发性肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后肿瘤反应评估及生存预测中的性能

Performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in tumor response evaluation and survival prediction of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.

作者信息

Zhang Yun, Wang Jinju, Li Hui, Zheng Tianying, Jiang Hanyu, Li Mou, Song Bin

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.

Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):388. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.120.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2020.03.120
PMID:32355832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7186681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was developed to evaluate the tumor response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of LI-RADS computed tomography (CT) TRA version 2018 in tumor response assessment and survival prediction of patients with single HCC after radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

Forty patients who underwent RFA for single HCC between 2010 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. The overall survival (OS) data from all the patients after the first therapy was collected. Two readers independently assessed the pretreatment (within 7 d) and posttreatment (within 90 d after RFA) CT manifestations using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA. Inter-reader agreement was assessed. Another radiologist re-evaluated any divergent results and came to the final conclusion. The performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA for tumor response assessment and predicting survival of patients with single HCC after RFA was evaluated.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was moderate between the 2 readers [κ=0.602, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.390-0.814] when using LI-RADS version 2018 TRA to evaluate tumor response for patients with single HCC after RFA. Patients classified as LR-TR viable had significantly lower OS than those classified as LR-TR nonviable (P=0.005) and LR-TR equivocal (P=0.036). However, the OS between LR-TR nonviable and LR-TR equivocal did not differ significantly (P=0.901).

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA can be applied to predict viable or nonviable HCC after RFA. Patients with LR-TR viable had significantly lower OS than those with LR-TR nonviable and LR-TR equivocal. More research is needed to validate the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 TRA in HCC tumor response evaluation, to better grasp the use of the tie-breaking rule, and to improve the accuracy of prediction for tumor viability.

摘要

背景

肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应算法(LI-RADS TRA)旨在评估肝细胞癌(HCC)患者经局部区域治疗后的肿瘤反应。本研究旨在评估LI-RADS 2018版计算机断层扫描(CT)TRA在射频消融(RFA)治疗后单发性HCC患者的肿瘤反应评估及生存预测中的性能。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2016年间因单发性HCC接受RFA治疗的40例患者。收集了所有患者首次治疗后的总生存(OS)数据。两名阅片者使用LI-RADS 2018版CT TRA独立评估治疗前(7天内)和治疗后(RFA后90天内)的CT表现。评估阅片者间的一致性。另一位放射科医生对任何有分歧的结果进行重新评估并得出最终结论。评估LI-RADS 2018版CT TRA在RFA治疗后单发性HCC患者的肿瘤反应评估及生存预测中的性能。

结果

当使用LI-RADS 2018版TRA评估RFA治疗后单发性HCC患者的肿瘤反应时,两名阅片者间的观察者间一致性为中等(κ=0.602,95%置信区间[CI]:0.390-0.814)。分类为LR-TR存活的患者的OS显著低于分类为LR-TR非存活(P=0.005)和LR-TR不确定(P=0.036)的患者。然而,LR-TR非存活和LR-TR不确定患者之间的OS差异无统计学意义(P=0.901)。

结论

LI-RADS 2018版CT TRA可用于预测RFA治疗后HCC的存活或非存活情况。LR-TR存活的患者的OS显著低于LR-TR非存活和LR-TR不确定的患者。需要更多研究来验证LI-RADS 2018版TRA在HCC肿瘤反应评估中的性能,以更好地掌握打破平局规则的使用,并提高肿瘤存活预测的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/ae3fb469cb42/atm-08-06-388-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/3dfba60ff820/atm-08-06-388-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/b1a817e9a758/atm-08-06-388-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/e9819d639f3b/atm-08-06-388-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/f41fbd4c434b/atm-08-06-388-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/ae3fb469cb42/atm-08-06-388-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/3dfba60ff820/atm-08-06-388-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/b1a817e9a758/atm-08-06-388-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/e9819d639f3b/atm-08-06-388-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/f41fbd4c434b/atm-08-06-388-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d7/7186681/ae3fb469cb42/atm-08-06-388-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in tumor response evaluation and survival prediction of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.2018版LI-RADS CT治疗反应算法在单发性肝细胞癌患者射频消融术后肿瘤反应评估及生存预测中的性能
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):388. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.120.
2
The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 MRI 治疗反应算法:消融治疗肝细胞癌的评估。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):320-326. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191581. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
3
Per-patient Negative Predictive Value of the CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.基于 CT 和 MRI 肝脏影像报告和数据系统 2018 版治疗反应算法的肝癌每例患者阴性预测值。
Radiology. 2023 Dec;309(3):e222776. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222776.
4
LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features.LI-RADS 版本 2018 经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌患者的细胞外对比增强 MRI 治疗反应算法:诊断性能和辅助特征的附加价值。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Sep;49(9):3045-3055. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04275-y. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm: Diagnostic Performance after Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 治疗反应算法:经肝动脉放射栓塞治疗肝细胞癌后的诊断性能。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1279-1288. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1159. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Post-treatment CT LI-RADS categories: predictors of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma post bland transarterial embolization.治疗后 CT LI-RADS 分类:肝动脉栓塞后肝细胞癌总体生存的预测因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Aug;46(8):3738-3747. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02775-1. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.将辅助 MRI 特征纳入 LI-RADS 治疗反应算法:对肝细胞癌局部治疗后诊断性能的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Mar;218(3):484-493. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26677. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
8
Reproducibility of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy.LI-RADS 治疗反应算法在局部区域治疗后对肝细胞癌的可重复性。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Sep;101(9):547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
9
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Contrast-Enhanced US Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)对比增强超声非放射性治疗反应评估 2024 版。
Radiology. 2024 May;311(2):e232369. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232369.
10
LI-RADS category is associated with treatment outcomes of small single HCC: surgical resection vs. radiofrequency ablation.LI-RADS 类别与小单发 HCC 的治疗结果相关:手术切除与射频消融。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):525-537. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09998-y. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
LI-RADS TRA V2024: innovations in imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to locoregional therapies.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)TRA V2024:肝细胞癌对局部区域治疗反应的影像评估创新
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05110-8.
2
Inter-Reader Agreement in LR-TRA Application and NLR Association in HCC Patients Treated with Endovascular vs. Ablative Procedures.肝癌患者接受血管内治疗与消融治疗时,LR-TRA应用中的阅片者间一致性及NLR相关性
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 1;17(3):492. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030492.
3
Radiological Assessment and Therapeutic Evaluation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Differentiation and Treatment Response with Japanese Guidelines.

本文引用的文献

1
The future is now: beyond first line systemic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.未来已来:超越肝细胞癌一线全身治疗
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(Suppl 3):S261-S274. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.11.23.
2
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the 2017 and 2018 versions of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI.对比钆塞酸增强 MRI 上 2017 版和 2018 版 LI-RADS 对肝细胞癌的诊断性能。
Clin Radiol. 2020 Apr;75(4):319.e1-319.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study.
肝细胞癌的放射学评估与治疗评价:依据日本指南进行的鉴别与治疗反应分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;17(1):101. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010101.
4
Artificial ascites‑assisted microwave ablation for liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm and perioperative nursing care.人工腹水辅助微波消融治疗膈下型肝癌及围手术期护理
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jun 18;28(2):382. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14515. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver surgery and thermal ablations: state of the art and future perspectives.肝切除术后及热消融后肝细胞癌复发的管理:现状与未来展望
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):71-88. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-579. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
Prolonged Survival after Recurrence in HCC Resected Patients Using Repeated Curative Therapies: Never Give Up!肝癌切除患者复发后采用重复根治性治疗的长期生存:永不放弃!
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;15(1):232. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010232.
7
Inter-observer agreement using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization.使用 LI-RADS 版本 2018 CT 治疗反应算法评估常规经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌患者的观察者间一致性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jan;47(1):115-122. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03272-9. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
LI-RADS: Future Directions.肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS):未来发展方向
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021 Apr 13;17(3):149-153. doi: 10.1002/cld.1034. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study.LI-RADS 2018 初始治疗反应在预测 TACE 后肝细胞癌患者生存中的表现:一项回顾性、单中心队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;147(12):3673-3683. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
10
Interreader Reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肝脏影像报告和数据系统治疗反应的阅片者间可靠性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 4;11(2):237. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020237.
钆塞酸增强磁共振成像与动态计算机断层扫描在局灶性肝脏病变特征描述中的个体内比较:一项多中心、多阅读者研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1616-1626. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0363.
4
The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018 MRI 治疗反应算法:消融治疗肝细胞癌的评估。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):320-326. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191581. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
5
Non-invasive diagnostic criteria of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of updated LI-RADS with clinical practice guidelines of OPTN-UNOS, AASLD, NCCN, EASL-EORTC, and KLSCG-NCC.肝细胞癌的无创性诊断标准:LI-RADS 更新版与 OPTN-UNOS、AASLD、NCCN、EASL-EORTC 和 KLSCG-NCC 临床实践指南的诊断准确性比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 10;14(12):e0226291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226291. eCollection 2019.
6
Retrospective comparison of EASL 2018 and LI-RADS 2018 for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.回顾性比较 EASL 2018 与 LI-RADS 2018 对磁共振成像诊断肝细胞癌的非侵入性诊断价值。
Hepatol Int. 2020 Jan;14(1):70-79. doi: 10.1007/s12072-019-10002-3. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Does microvascular invasion in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma indicate early-stage behavior?巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期A期多结节肝细胞癌中的微血管侵犯是否提示早期行为?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(18):428. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.114.
8
Validation of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response Criteria After Thermal Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝肿瘤热消融治疗后 Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 治疗应答标准的验证。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Feb;26(2):203-214. doi: 10.1002/lt.25673. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
9
Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.采用 2017 版肝脏影像报告和数据系统评估肝移植术后肝癌患者的治疗反应。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):261-271. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06376-5. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
10
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to assess hepatocellular carcinoma response to Transarterial chemoembolization using LI-RADS criteria: A pilot study.基于 LI-RADS 标准的动态对比增强磁共振成像评估经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的反应:一项初步研究。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;62:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 25.