University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
J Lesbian Stud. 2024;28(2):233-251. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2023.2294676. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
Despite the modern association of ancient Amazons and Diana's huntresses with lesbianism, scholarly accounts of these groups as they appear in ancient Greek and Roman literature have rarely adverted to any hints of homoeroticism. This article re-examines several narratives concerning Amazons and huntresses in Latin literature (including Camilla in Vergil's and Phaedra in Seneca's eponymous tragedy) from the perspective of queer kinship and female homosociality, demonstrating the ways in which these characters subvert traditional norms of kinship and femininity, replacing patriarchal control with female sodality, often imaged as a "sister" relationship. It suggests that, even if we do not interpret these intense homosocial bonds as erotic, we can nonetheless perceive a more radical rejection of social norms that transcends genital sexuality and merits the label of "queerness", insofar as queerness can be defined as a resistance to normativity.
尽管现代人们将古代亚马逊人和戴安娜的女猎手与女同性恋联系在一起,但在古希腊和罗马文学中,对这些群体的学术描述很少提及任何同性恋的暗示。本文从酷儿亲属关系和女性同性社会性的角度重新审视了拉丁文学中涉及亚马逊人和女猎手的几个叙述(包括维吉尔的卡米拉和塞内卡同名悲剧中的费德拉),展示了这些人物颠覆传统亲属关系和女性气质规范的方式,用女性联谊会取代父权控制,通常被描绘为“姐妹”关系。它表明,即使我们不将这些强烈的同性社交关系解释为色情关系,我们仍然可以察觉到对超越生殖性行为的社会规范的更激进的拒绝,并且可以贴上“酷儿”的标签,因为酷儿可以被定义为对规范性的抵制。