Classical Civilizations, Gonzaga University, Spokane, United States.
J Lesbian Stud. 2024;28(2):298-320. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2024.2309057. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
In this article, Amazon imagery serves as a case study for the complicated relationship of lesbian separatist movements of the 1970s and the classical Greek tradition. I consider how the use of mythological figures allowed lesbian feminists to rewrite and subvert dominant patriarchal narratives in ways that furthered their revolutionary projects. I argue that the nature of mythology is fundamentally fluid, collaborative, and open to queer reinterpretations and appropriations in ways that are rich with symbolic potential. Furthermore, the creation of separatist communities approximates an act of nation-building, and it is useful to consider other attempts to construct and theorize nations, ranging from Homi Bhabha on post-/anticolonial resistance to Berlant and Freeman on Queer Nationality. In particular, when considering a lesbian movement, we should remember that queer theory is messy because queerness itself is messy and resists boundaries and classification. Furthermore, what Ward frames as "dyke methods" (or dyke-centric queer methods) insist on categories that are fluid, messy, and shifting in their classifications and drawn toward as-yet-unknown queer possibilities. To study lesbian separatists with dyke methods is to embark on "an antiessentialist and interdisciplinary project" without necessarily "making a commitment to balanced ideas" (pp. 82-83). It is my hope that a messy, queer analysis of Amazonian symbolism in the construction of a lesbian nationalism will ultimately offer intriguing, if at times contradictory, possibilities.
本文以亚马逊形象为例,探讨了 20 世纪 70 年代女同性恋分离主义运动与古典希腊传统之间复杂的关系。我考虑了神话人物的使用如何使女同性恋女权主义者能够以进一步推进其革命计划的方式改写和颠覆主导的父权叙事。我认为,神话的本质从根本上是流动的、协作的,并且可以以富有象征潜力的方式接受酷儿的重新解释和挪用。此外,分离主义社区的创建近似于一种建国行为,因此考虑其他构建和理论化国家的尝试是有用的,从霍米·巴巴的后殖民/反殖民抵抗到贝伦特和弗里曼的酷儿国籍。特别是,当考虑女同性恋运动时,我们应该记住,酷儿理论是混乱的,因为酷儿本身就是混乱的,它抵制界限和分类。此外,沃德所说的“女同性恋方法”(或女同性恋中心的酷儿方法)坚持认为,这些类别是流动的、混乱的和不断变化的,它们在分类上是模糊的,并倾向于未知的酷儿可能性。用女同性恋方法研究女同性恋分离主义者,就是要从事“一项反本质主义和跨学科的项目”,而不必“致力于平衡的想法”(第 82-83 页)。我希望对女同性恋民族主义构建中的亚马逊象征主义进行混乱的、酷儿的分析,最终会提供有趣的、如果有时是矛盾的可能性。