Hernandez Raymond, Jin Haomiao, Pyatak Elizabeth A, Roll Shawn C, Gonzalez Jeffrey S, Schneider Stefan
Dornsife Center for Economic & Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2024;25(1):67-85. doi: 10.1080/1463922x.2022.2149878. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
Associations between various forms of activity engagement (e.g. work, leisure) and the experience of stress in workers have been widely documented. The mechanisms underlying these effects, however, are not fully understood. Our goal was to investigate if perceived whole day workload accounted for the relationships between daily frequencies of activities (i.e. work hours and leisure/rest) and daily stress. We analyzed data from 56 workers with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who completed approximately two weeks of intensive longitudinal assessments. Daily whole day workload was measured with an adapted version of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). A variety of occupations were reported including lawyer, housekeeper, and teacher. In multilevel path analyses, day-to-day changes in whole day workload mediated 67% (p<.001), 61% (p<.001), 38% (p<.001), and 55% (p<.001) of the within-person relationships between stress and work hours, rest frequency, active leisure frequency, and day of week, respectively. Our results provided evidence that whole day workload perception may contribute to the processes linking daily activities with daily stress in workers with T1D. Perceived whole day workload may deserve greater attention as a possible stress intervention target, ones that perhaps ergonomists would be especially suited to address.
各种形式的活动参与(如工作、休闲)与工作者的压力体验之间的关联已有大量文献记载。然而,这些影响背后的机制尚未完全明了。我们的目标是调查全天工作量感知是否能够解释活动的每日频率(即工作时长与休闲/休息时间)与每日压力之间的关系。我们分析了56名1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的数据,这些患者完成了大约两周的密集纵向评估。使用美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)的改编版本来测量每日全天工作量。报告的职业种类繁多,包括律师、管家和教师。在多层次路径分析中,全天工作量的每日变化分别介导了压力与工作时长、休息频率、积极休闲频率以及星期几之间个体内部关系的67%(p<.001)、61%(p<.001)、38%(p<.001)和55%(p<.001)。我们的结果表明,全天工作量感知可能在将T1D患者的日常活动与日常压力联系起来的过程中发挥作用。全天工作量感知作为一个可能的压力干预目标,或许值得更多关注,而这可能是人类工程学专家特别适合解决的问题。