Suppr超能文献

单焦点与多焦点巩膜镜设计的视觉质量评估与比较:一项初步研究。

Visual Quality Assessment and Comparison of Monofocal and Multifocal Scleral Lens Designs: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Vision (A.P.-A., G.V.-S., M.R., M.S., G.C.), Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain; and Ocupharm Research Group (A.P.-A., G.V.-S., M.R., M.S., G.C.), Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eye Contact Lens. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):35-40. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001046. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare visual quality, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis, subjective vision, and comfort between monofocal and multifocal scleral lens (SL) designs.

METHODS

An experimental, cross over and short-term pilot study has been performed. Nineteen presbyopic patients (51.9±3.8 years) with regular corneas participated voluntarily in the study and Onefit MED monofocal and multifocal SL designs were fitted bilaterally. Subjective vision and comfort, contrast sensitivity function, stereopsis, high- and low-contrast visual acuity (VA) at 4 m and 40 cm under photopic and mesopic conditions, and defocus curves were measured. Data analysis was performed with nonparametric tests. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Mean addition power of the prescribed lenses was 1.72±0.38 diopters. Multifocal design showed a statistically significant improvement for intermediate and near vision in the defocus curve under photopic and mesopic conditions (P<0.05), however, worsening in stereopsis (P<0.05) and contrast sensitivity for high spatial frequencies (P<0.05). Distance visual acuity (VA) showed significantly lower values under mesopic conditions for high- and low-contrast tests (P<0.05), and on low-contrast test under photopic conditions (P<0.001) with the multifocal design.

CONCLUSION

Multifocal SLs showed better visual performance at intermediate and near distances without compromising distance vision under photopic conditions for a high-contrast test when compared with monofocal design.

摘要

目的

比较单焦点和多焦点巩膜镜(SL)设计的视觉质量、对比敏感度、立体视、主观视觉和舒适度。

方法

进行了一项实验性、交叉和短期的初步研究。19 名规则角膜的远视患者(51.9±3.8 岁)自愿参与研究,双侧适配 Onefit MED 单焦点和多焦点 SL 设计。测量了主观视觉和舒适度、对比敏感度功能、立体视、明视和中视条件下 4m 和 40cm 的高低对比度视力(VA)以及离焦曲线。使用非参数检验进行数据分析。P<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

预定镜片的平均附加力为 1.72±0.38 屈光度。多焦点设计在明视和中视条件下离焦曲线的中距和近距视觉显示出统计学上的显著改善(P<0.05),然而立体视(P<0.05)和高空间频率对比度敏感度(P<0.05)恶化。距离 VA 在中视条件下的高、低对比度测试(P<0.05)以及明视条件下的低对比度测试(P<0.001)中,多焦点设计的数值明显较低。

结论

与单焦点设计相比,多焦点 SL 在明视条件下不影响远距离视力的情况下,在中距和近距离具有更好的视觉性能,并且在高对比度测试中具有更好的近距视觉性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验