Suppr超能文献

评估一种用于矫正老花眼的新型定制多焦点角膜巩膜接触镜早期临床效果的初步研究。

Pilot Study Evaluating the Early Clinical Outcomes Obtained with a Novel, Customized, Multifocal Corneo-Scleral Contact Lens for Presbyopia Correction.

作者信息

Barberán-Bernardos Laura, Soriano Salcedo Daniel, Díaz-Gómez Sergio, Piñero David P

机构信息

Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.

Centro Oftalmológico Integral Bilbao Berri SL, Miranza COI Bilbao, 48008 Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 25;15(5):700. doi: 10.3390/life15050700.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective was to preliminarily evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes obtained in presbyopic patients with a novel, multifocal, customized corneo-scleral contact lens (CSCL).

METHODS

A total of 11 presbyopic subjects (age 45-80 years, corrected-distance visual acuity ≤ 0.1 LogMAR, near addition ≥ +1.00 D) were recruited and fitted with a multifocal corneo-scleral contact lens in this pilot study. Pre-fitting evaluations included stereopsis, contrast sensitivity (CS), and ocular aberrometry, with follow-up assessments conducted at 20 min and 1-month post-fitting. The defocus curve was also measured to assess visual performance across varying distances.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eyes from 11 participants (53.9 ± 4.7 years, 10 female) were included in this study. Significant changes were observed post-fitting for primary and secondary spherical aberration, coma, and stereopsis ( ≤ 0.033). No significant changes in Strehl ratio and total root mean square were detected ( ≥ 0.182). Binocular contrast sensitivity was better with spectacles than with the fitted CSCL at all frequencies ( ≤ 0.048), but the change in monocular did not reach statistical significance for 18 cycles per degree ( = 0.109). All patients and 90.9% of patients achieved a visual acuity of 0.0 LogMAR or better at distance and at intermediate, respectively, and 91.8% achieved 0.3 LogMAR or better for near vision.

CONCLUSIONS

The customized CSCL evaluated provided functional recovery of visual quality across distances, with acceptable reductions of CS and stereopsis that are comparable to those reported for other multifocal contact lenses.

摘要

背景

目的是初步评估一种新型、多焦点、定制角膜巩膜接触镜(CSCL)在老视患者中获得的短期临床效果。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,共招募了11名老视受试者(年龄45 - 80岁,矫正远视力≤0.1 LogMAR,近附加度数≥ +1.00 D),并为其佩戴多焦点角膜巩膜接触镜。配镜前评估包括立体视、对比敏感度(CS)和眼像差测量,并在配镜后20分钟和1个月进行随访评估。还测量了散焦曲线以评估不同距离的视觉性能。

结果

本研究纳入了11名参与者(53.9 ± 4.7岁,10名女性)的22只眼睛。配镜后观察到初级和次级球差、彗差和立体视有显著变化(≤0.033)。未检测到斯特列尔比率和总均方根的显著变化(≥0.182)。在所有频率下,双眼对比敏感度戴眼镜时均优于佩戴CSCL时(≤0.048),但单眼在每度18周期时的变化未达到统计学显著性(= 0.109)。所有患者在远视力和中视力时分别有90.9%的患者视力达到0.0 LogMAR或更好,91.8%的患者近视力达到0.3 LogMAR或更好。

结论

所评估的定制CSCL在不同距离提供了视觉质量的功能恢复,对比敏感度和立体视的降低可接受,与其他多焦点接触镜报道的情况相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a56/12113357/30509987eaf5/life-15-00700-g001.jpg

相似文献

3
Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Jan;96(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00791.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
4
Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45.
5
Visual quality assessment and comparison of two multifocal scleral lens designs.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Feb;47(1):102098. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.102098. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Visual performance of a multifocal toric soft contact lens.
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Nov;89(11):1627-35. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31826b0934.
8
A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

2
The effect of landing zone toricity on scleral lens fitting characteristics and optics.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jul;44(5):867-875. doi: 10.1111/opo.13324. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Visual Quality Assessment and Comparison of Monofocal and Multifocal Scleral Lens Designs: A Pilot Study.
Eye Contact Lens. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):35-40. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001046. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Visual quality assessment and comparison of two multifocal scleral lens designs.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Feb;47(1):102098. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.102098. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Update on indications, complications, and outcomes of scleral contact lenses.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 24;10(4):165-178. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1435. eCollection 2021 Winter.
6
Efficacy of Presbyopia-Correcting Contact Lenses: A Systematic Review.
Eye Contact Lens. 2023 Aug 1;49(8):319-328. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001013.
8
Optical simulations of the impact of vault increase in scleral contact lenses in healthy eyes.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Aug;46(4):101847. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101847. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
9
Vision tests on spectacle lenses and contact lenses for optical myopia correction: a pilot study.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 5;7(1):e000971. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-000971. eCollection 2022.
10
Contrast Sensitivity with Center-distance Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses.
Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Apr 1;99(4):342-349. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001874.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验