Deere Rachel, Chowdhury Enhad, Tabor Abby, Thompson Dylan, Bilzon James L J
Centre for Clinical Rehabilitation and Exercise Medicine (CREM), Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Centre for Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (CNEM), Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 6;4:1277482. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1277482. eCollection 2023.
Some patients with chronic knee pain experience an increase in knee pain following a single bout of exercise involving their knee joint, which can negatively affect exercise adherence and thus result in reduced overall health and lack of disease management. We want to determine whether a single bout of upper-body (UB) aerobic arm-ergometry exercise is effective in reducing the experience of pain in those with chronic knee pain compared with lower-body (LB) aerobic leg ergometry exercise.
A total of 19 individuals (women = 11, men = 8; age = 63 ± 8 years; body mass index = 24 ± 3 kg/m) who suffered from chronic knee pain for ≥3 months took part in this study. Arm-ergometry and cycle-ergometry exercises were performed for 30 min at a moderate intensity, separated by 7 days. Pain intensity was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS) pre- and post-exercise and for 7 days post-exercise. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) and mechanical detection threshold (MDT) were measured pre- and post-exercise at both local and distal anatomical sites. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
VAS pain was significantly reduced ( = 0.035) at 1 day post-exercise following the UB exercise trial (-1.4 ± 0.8) when compared with the LB exercise trial (+0.1 ± 2.1). Both UB and LB exercises were effective in reducing local and distal PPT. MDT responses were heterogeneous, and no differences between the UB and LB exercise conditions were noted.
An acute bout of upper-body aerobic arm-ergometry exercise evoked a significant decrease in the affected knee joint pain in individuals with chronic knee pain of up to 24 h/1 day post-exercise compared with lower-body aerobic exercise. While the exact mechanisms remain unclear, upper-body exercise may offer a viable, novel therapeutic treatment for patients with chronic knee pain.
一些慢性膝关节疼痛患者在进行一次涉及膝关节的运动后,膝关节疼痛会加剧,这可能对运动依从性产生负面影响,进而导致整体健康状况下降和疾病管理不善。我们想确定与下半身(LB)有氧腿部测力计运动相比,一次上半身(UB)有氧手臂测力计运动是否能有效减轻慢性膝关节疼痛患者的疼痛体验。
共有19名患有慢性膝关节疼痛≥3个月的个体(女性11名,男性8名;年龄63±8岁;体重指数24±3kg/m²)参与了本研究。手臂测力计运动和自行车测力计运动以中等强度进行30分钟,中间间隔7天。在运动前、运动后以及运动后7天通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。在运动前和运动后在局部和远端解剖部位测量压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和机械检测阈值(MDT)。数据以平均值±标准差表示。
与LB运动试验(+0.1±2.1)相比,UB运动试验后1天VAS疼痛显著降低(P = 0.035)(-1.4±0.8)。UB和LB运动均能有效降低局部和远端PPT。MDT反应存在异质性,未观察到UB和LB运动条件之间的差异。
与下半身有氧运动相比,一次急性上半身有氧手臂测力计运动可使慢性膝关节疼痛个体受影响的膝关节疼痛在运动后长达24小时/1天内显著减轻。虽然确切机制尚不清楚,但上半身运动可能为慢性膝关节疼痛患者提供一种可行的新型治疗方法。