• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习通过警方数据和超级学习预测家庭凶杀案。

Using machine learning to forecast domestic homicide via police data and super learning.

作者信息

Verrey Jacob, Ariel Barak, Harinam Vincent, Dillon Luke

机构信息

Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Ave, Cambridge, CB3 9DA, UK.

Institute of Criminology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mt. Scopus, 9190501, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50274-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-50274-2
PMID:38129649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10739734/
Abstract

We explore the feasibility of using machine learning on a police dataset to forecast domestic homicides. Existing forecasting instruments based on ordinary statistical instruments focus on non-fatal revictimization, produce outputs with limited predictive validity, or both. We implement a "super learner," a machine learning paradigm that incorporates roughly a dozen machine learning models to increase the recall and AUC of forecasting using any one model. We purposely incorporate police records only, rather than multiple data sources, to illustrate the practice utility of the super learner, as additional datasets are often unavailable due to confidentiality considerations. Using London Metropolitan Police Service data, our model outperforms all extant domestic homicide forecasting tools: the super learner detects 77.64% of homicides, with a precision score of 18.61% and a 71.04% Area Under the Curve (AUC), which, collectively and severely, are assessed as "excellent." Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

摘要

我们探讨了在警方数据集上使用机器学习来预测家庭凶杀案的可行性。现有的基于普通统计工具的预测手段侧重于非致命的再次受害情况,产生的预测结果有效性有限,或两者皆有。我们实施了一种“超级学习器”,这是一种机器学习范式,它整合了大约十二种机器学习模型,以提高使用任何单一模型进行预测的召回率和曲线下面积(AUC)。我们特意仅纳入警方记录,而非多个数据源,以说明超级学习器的实际效用,因为出于保密考虑,通常无法获取额外的数据集。使用伦敦警察厅的数据,我们的模型优于所有现有的家庭凶杀案预测工具:超级学习器能检测出77.64%的凶杀案,精确率得分为18.61%,曲线下面积(AUC)为71.04%,总体而言,这些指标被严格评估为“优秀”。我们还讨论了其对理论、研究和实践的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a2a/10739734/30fefbde78ce/41598_2023_50274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a2a/10739734/9be28942fec4/41598_2023_50274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a2a/10739734/30fefbde78ce/41598_2023_50274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a2a/10739734/9be28942fec4/41598_2023_50274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a2a/10739734/30fefbde78ce/41598_2023_50274_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using machine learning to forecast domestic homicide via police data and super learning.利用机器学习通过警方数据和超级学习预测家庭凶杀案。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50274-2.
2
Development of a Machine Learning Model to Estimate US Firearm Homicides in Near Real Time.开发一个机器学习模型以实时估算美国的枪支凶杀事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233413. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3413.
3
Homicides by Police: Comparing Counts From the National Violent Death Reporting System, Vital Statistics, and Supplementary Homicide Reports.警察杀人事件:比较来自国家暴力死亡报告系统、人口统计数据和补充杀人报告的数据。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):922-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303074. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
The Police Role in Domestic Homicide Prevention: Lessons From a Domestic Violence Death Review Committee.警方在预防家庭凶杀案中的作用:来自家庭暴力死亡审查委员会的经验教训。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):NP1886-NP1907. doi: 10.1177/0886260520933030. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
The specifics of homicide-suicide in France.法国的杀人-自杀案件详情。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2023 Nov;100:102596. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2023.102596. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Emerging trends in domestic homicide/femicide in Greece over the period 2010-2021.2010年至2021年期间希腊家庭凶杀案/杀害女性案件的新趋势。
Med Sci Law. 2023 Apr;63(2):120-131. doi: 10.1177/00258024221103700. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
7
The Value of Incorporating Measures of Relationship Concordance When Constructing Profiles of Intimate Partner Homicides: A Descriptive Study of IPH Committed Within London, 1998-2009.构建亲密伴侣杀人案概况时纳入关系一致性测量的价值:1998 - 2009年伦敦发生的亲密伴侣杀人案描述性研究
J Interpers Violence. 2017 May;32(10):1476-1500. doi: 10.1177/0886260515589565. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
8
Prediction of diabetes disease using an ensemble of machine learning multi-classifier models.使用机器学习多分类器集成模型预测糖尿病疾病。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Sep 12;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05465-z.
9
Ability of crime, demographic and business data to forecast areas of increased violence.犯罪、人口统计和商业数据预测暴力事件增加地区的能力。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2018 Dec;25(4):443-448. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2018.1467461. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
A two-stage super learner for healthcare expenditures.一种用于医疗保健支出的两阶段超级学习器。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2022 Dec;22(4):435-453. doi: 10.1007/s10742-022-00275-x. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning for prediction of violent behaviors in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review.机器学习用于预测精神分裂症谱系障碍中的暴力行为:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 21;15:1384828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1384828. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical considerations for specifying a super learner.指定超级学习者的实用考虑因素。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1276-1285. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad023.
2
Predicting Intimate Partner Violence Reassault and Homicide: A Practitioner's Guide to Making Sense of Predictive Validity Statistics.预测亲密伴侣暴力再犯及杀人行为:从业者解读预测效度统计数据指南
Soc Work. 2022 Dec 23;68(1):81-85. doi: 10.1093/sw/swac044.
3
Machine Learning and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review of Advanced Methodology for Recidivism Risk Prediction.
机器学习与刑事司法:累犯风险预测先进方法的系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;19(17):10594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710594.
4
Victims, offenders and victim-offender overlaps of knife crime: A social network analysis approach using police records.持刀犯罪的受害者、犯罪者和犯罪者-受害者重叠:使用警方记录的社会网络分析方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0242621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242621. eCollection 2020.
5
The Validity and Reliability of Available Intimate Partner Homicide and Reassault Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review.可用的亲密伴侣杀人及再攻击风险评估工具的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jan;22(1):18-40. doi: 10.1177/1524838018821952. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care?人工智能、机器学习、深度学习和认知计算:这些术语是什么意思,它们将如何影响医疗保健?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2358-2361. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.067. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
7
The Lethality Screen: The Predictive Validity of an Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment for Use by First Responders.致死性筛查:急救人员使用的亲密伴侣暴力风险评估的预测效度。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jan;32(2):205-226. doi: 10.1177/0886260515585540. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
8
Intimate partner violence: development of a brief risk assessment for the emergency department.亲密伴侣暴力:急诊科简短风险评估的制定。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00457.x.
9
The danger assessment: validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide.危险评估:亲密伴侣女性杀人致死风险评估工具的验证
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Apr;24(4):653-74. doi: 10.1177/0886260508317180. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
10
Super learner.超级学习者。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2007;6:Article25. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1309. Epub 2007 Sep 16.