Department of Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Apr;25(4):e14238. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14238. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) can be treated on the CyberKnife system using two different treatment delivery paths: the general-purpose full path corrects small rotations, while the dedicated trigeminal path improves dose fall-off but does not allow rotational corrections. The study evaluates the impact of uncorrected rotations on brainstem dose and the length of CN5 (denoted as L) covered by the prescription dose.
A proposed model estimates the delivered dose considering translational and rotational delivery errors for TN treatments on the CyberKnife system. The model is validated using radiochromic film measurements with and without rotational setup error for both paths. L and the brainstem dose is retrospectively assessed for 24 cases planned using the trigeminal path. For 15 cases, plans generated using both paths are compared for the target coverage and toxicity to the brainstem.
In experimental validations, measured and estimated doses agree at 1%/1 mm level. For 24 cases, the treated L is 5.3 ± 1.7 mm, reduced from 5.9 ± 1.8 mm in the planned dose. Constraints for the brainstem are met in 23 cases for the treated dose but require frequent treatment interruption to maintain rotational corrections <0.5° using the trigeminal path. The treated length of CN5, and plan quality metrics are similar for the two paths, favoring the full path where rotations are corrected.
We validated an analytical model that can provide patient-specific tolerances on rotations to meet plan objectives. Treatment using the full path can reduce treatment time and allow for rotational corrections.
三叉神经痛 (TN) 可以在 CyberKnife 系统上通过两种不同的治疗输送路径进行治疗:通用全路径可纠正小角度旋转,而专用三叉神经路径则可改善剂量下降,但不允许旋转校正。本研究评估了未校正旋转对脑干剂量和处方剂量覆盖的 CN5 长度(表示为 L)的影响。
提出了一种模型,该模型考虑了 CyberKnife 系统上 TN 治疗的平移和旋转输送误差,以估计输送剂量。该模型使用两种路径的放射色胶片测量值(带和不带旋转设置误差)进行了验证。回顾性评估了 24 例使用三叉神经路径计划的病例的 L 和脑干剂量。对于 15 例病例,比较了使用两种路径生成的计划,以评估靶区覆盖率和对脑干的毒性。
在实验验证中,测量剂量和估计剂量在 1%/1mm 水平上一致。对于 24 例病例,治疗的 L 为 5.3±1.7mm,低于计划剂量的 5.9±1.8mm。在治疗剂量下,23 例病例满足脑干约束条件,但在使用三叉神经路径时需要频繁中断治疗以保持旋转校正<0.5°。两种路径的治疗 CN5 长度和计划质量指标相似,在可纠正旋转的全路径中更有利。
我们验证了一种分析模型,该模型可以为满足计划目标提供患者特定的旋转容限。使用全路径治疗可以减少治疗时间并允许进行旋转校正。