Graduate Program in Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo(FORP/USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMRP/USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2023 Nov-Dec;34(6):130-139. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305542.
The objective of this study was to compare the activation of gelatinases in dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) and underlying dentin of permanent teeth after experimental radiotherapy in conventional and hypofractionated modalities. Newly extracted third molars (n = 15) were divided into three experimental radiotherapy groups: control, conventional (CR), and hypofractionated (HR) (n = 5 per group). After in vitro exposure to ionizing radiation, following standardized protocols for each modality, a gelatinous substrate was incubated on the tooth slices (n = 10 per group). Activation of gelatinases was measured by in situ zymography, expressed in arbitrary fluorescence units (mm2) from three tooth regions: cervical, cuspal, and pit. Fluorescence intensity was compared among radiotherapy protocols and tooth regions in each protocol, considering a significance level of 5%. Considering all tooth regions, the fluorescence intensity of the CR group was higher than the HR and control groups, both in DEJ and underlying dentin (p <0.001). In addition, the fluorescence intensity was higher in underlying dentin when compared to DEJ in all groups (p <0.001). Considering each tooth region, a statistically significant difference between CR and HR was only observed in the pit region of underlying dentin (p <0.001). Significant and positive correlations between fluorescence intensities in DEJ and underlying dentin were also observed (p <0.001). Experimental radiotherapy influenced the activation of gelatinases, as well as exposure to the conventional protocol can trigger a higher activation of gelatinases when compared to hypofractionated, both in DEJ and underlying dentin.
本研究旨在比较常规和低分割放射治疗模式下实验性放射治疗后牙釉牙骨质界(DEJ)和牙本质下的明胶酶激活。将 15 颗新提取的第三磨牙(n = 15)分为三组实验性放射治疗组:对照组、常规(CR)和低分割(HR)(每组 n = 5)。在体外暴露于电离辐射后,按照每种模式的标准化方案,在牙切片上孵育胶原材料(每组 n = 10)。通过原位酶谱法测量明胶酶的激活,以任意荧光单位(mm2)表示三个牙区:颈部、尖部和窝沟。在每个方案中,比较放射治疗方案和牙区之间的荧光强度,考虑到 5%的显著性水平。考虑到所有牙区,CR 组的荧光强度均高于 HR 组和对照组,在 DEJ 和牙本质下均如此(p <0.001)。此外,在所有组中,牙本质下的荧光强度均高于 DEJ(p <0.001)。考虑到每个牙区,仅在 HR 组的牙本质下窝沟区观察到 CR 和 HR 之间存在统计学差异(p <0.001)。DEJ 和牙本质下的荧光强度之间也存在显著正相关(p <0.001)。实验性放射治疗影响明胶酶的激活,与低分割相比,常规暴露可以引发更高的明胶酶激活,无论是在 DEJ 还是牙本质下。