Suppr超能文献

氟斑釉对牙酸蚀症的易感性及氟化物处理。

Fluorotic Enamel Susceptibility to Dental Erosion and Fluoride Treatment.

机构信息

Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.

Department of Morphology, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraiba, Joao Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2023 Nov-Dec;34(6):75-81. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305595.

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to test the hypothesis that fluoride treatment can prevent dental erosion on fluorotic enamel of different severities. It followed a 3×2 factorial design, considering a) fluorosis severity: sound (TF0, Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index), mild (TF1-2), moderate (TF3-4); and b) fluoride treatment: 0 (negative control) and 1150ppmF. Human molars with the three fluorosis severities (n=16, each) were selected and randomly assigned to the two fluoride treatments (n=8). Enamel blocks (4×4mm) were prepared from each tooth and subjected to a dental erosion cycling model, for 10 days. The daily cycling protocol consisted of erosive challenges (1% citric acid, pH 2.4), interspersed by periods of immersion in artificial saliva, and three 2-minute treatments with either 0 or 1150ppm F. The enamel volume loss (mm3) was calculated by subtracting values obtained by microtomography before and after cycling. Two-Way ANOVA showed no significant interaction between fluorosis severity and fluoride treatment (p=0.691), and no significant effect for either fluorosis severity (TF0 mean±standard-deviation: 13.5(10-2±0.42(10-2, TF1-2: 1.50(10-2±0.52(10-2, TF3-4: 1.24(10-2±0.52(10-2, p=0.416) or treatment (0ppmF: 1.49(10-2±0.53(10-2; 1150ppmF: 1.21(10-2±0.42(10-2; p=0.093), when evaluated independently. Considering the limitations of this in vitro study, the presence and severity of fluorosis in enamel do not appear to affect its susceptibility to dental erosion. Fluoride treatment was not effective in preventing the development of dental erosion in both sound and fluorotic enamel substrates under our experimental conditions.

摘要

本体外研究旨在验证假说,即氟化物处理可预防不同严重程度氟斑牙的牙齿酸蚀。该研究采用 3×2 析因设计,考虑了:a)氟斑牙严重程度:正常(TF0,Thylstrup-Fejerskov 指数)、轻度(TF1-2)、中度(TF3-4);b)氟化物处理:0(阴性对照)和 1150ppmF。选择了三种氟斑牙严重程度(每组 16 颗牙,n=16),并随机分配至两种氟化物处理组(每组 8 颗牙,n=8)。从每颗牙上制备 4×4mm 的牙釉质块,并进行牙酸蚀循环模型实验,持续 10 天。每日循环方案包括侵蚀挑战(1%柠檬酸,pH 值 2.4),穿插唾液浸泡期,以及用 0 或 1150ppmF 进行 3 次 2 分钟处理。通过微断层扫描在循环前后获得的牙釉质体积损失(mm3)进行计算。双因素方差分析显示氟斑牙严重程度和氟化物处理之间无显著交互作用(p=0.691),氟斑牙严重程度(TF0 均值±标准差:13.5(10-2±0.42(10-2、TF1-2:1.50(10-2±0.52(10-2、TF3-4:1.24(10-2±0.52(10-2,p=0.416)或处理(0ppmF:1.49(10-2±0.53(10-2;1150ppmF:1.21(10-2±0.42(10-2,p=0.093)均无显著影响。考虑到本体外研究的局限性,牙釉质中的氟斑牙存在及其严重程度似乎不会影响其对牙齿酸蚀的易感性。在我们的实验条件下,氟化物处理对正常和氟斑牙牙釉质基质的牙齿酸蚀发展均无预防作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e321/10742357/284058ce7ef8/1806-4760-bdj-34-06-75-gf2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验