Suppr超能文献

原位评价含氟化物、亚锡和多聚磷酸盐溶液对牙釉质侵蚀的作用。

In situ evaluation of fluoride-, stannous- and polyphosphate-containing solutions against enamel erosion.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 2227, Cidade Universitária, Zip code: 05508-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Materiais, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, IPEN-CNEN/SP, Butantã, P.O. Box 11049, São Paulo, SP 05422-970, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent. 2017 Aug;63:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the anti-erosive effect of solutions containing sodium fluoride (F: 225ppm of fluoride), sodium fluoride+stannous chloride (F+Sn: 225ppm of fluoride+800ppm of stannous), sodium fluoride+stannous chloride+sodium linear polyphosphate (F+Sn+LPP: 225ppm of fluoride+800ppm of stannous+2% of sodium linear polyphosphate), and deionized water (C: control), using a four-phase, single-blind, crossover in situ clinical trial.

METHODS

In each phase, 12 volunteers wore appliances containing 4 enamel specimens, which were submitted to a 5-day erosion-remineralization phase that consisted of 2h of salivary pellicle formation with the appliance in situ, followed by 2min extra-oral immersion in 1% citric acid (pH 2.4), 6x/day, with 90min of exposure to saliva in situ between the challenges. Treatment with the test solutions was performed extra-orally for 2 min, 2x/day. At the end of the experiment, surface loss (SL, in μm) was evaluated by optical profilometry. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). The surface of additional specimens was evaluated by x-ray diffraction after treatments (n=3).

RESULTS

C (mean SL±standard-deviation: 5.97±1.70) and F (5.36±1.59) showed the highest SL, with no significant difference between them (p>0.05). F+Sn (2.68±1.62) and F+Sn+LPP (2.10±0.95) did not differ from each other (p>0.05), but presented lower SL than the other groups (P<0.05). Apatite and stannous deposits on specimen surfaces were identified in the x-ray analysis for F+Sn and F+Sn+LPP.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium fluoride solution exhibited no significant anti-erosive effect. The combination between sodium fluoride and stannous chloride reduced enamel erosion, irrespective of the presence of linear sodium polyphosphate.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Under highly erosive conditions, sodium fluoride rinse may not be a suitable alternative to prevent enamel erosion. A rinse containing sodium fluoride and stannous chloride was shown to be a better treatment option, which was not further improved by addition of the sodium linear polyphosphate.

摘要

目的

采用四相、单盲、交叉体内临床试验,评价含氟(F:氟 225ppm)、氟+锡(F+Sn:氟 225ppm+锡 800ppm)、氟+锡+线性聚磷酸钠(F+Sn+LPP:氟 225ppm+锡 800ppm+线性聚磷酸钠 2%)和去离子水(C:对照)溶液的抗侵蚀效果。

方法

在每个阶段,12 名志愿者佩戴含有 4 个釉质样本的矫治器,进行为期 5 天的侵蚀再矿化阶段,包括 2 小时原位唾液膜形成,然后每天 6 次将矫治器在口腔外浸入 1%柠檬酸(pH2.4)2 分钟,每次间隔 90 分钟。每天口腔外处理测试溶液 2 分钟,2 次。实验结束时,采用光学轮廓仪评估表面损失(SL,μm)。采用方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)进行数据分析。对处理后的附加样本表面采用 X 射线衍射进行评估(n=3)。

结果

C(平均 SL±标准差:5.97±1.70)和 F(5.36±1.59)的 SL 最高,两者之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。F+Sn(2.68±1.62)和 F+Sn+LPP(2.10±0.95)之间无差异(p>0.05),但低于其他组(P<0.05)。X 射线分析显示 F+Sn 和 F+Sn+LPP 样本表面有磷灰石和锡沉积。

结论

氟化物溶液无明显抗侵蚀作用。氟化物和锡的联合应用可减少釉质侵蚀,而不论是否存在线性聚磷酸钠。

临床意义

在高度侵蚀的情况下,含氟漱口水可能不是预防釉质侵蚀的合适选择。含氟化物和锡的漱口水是一种更好的治疗选择,添加线性聚磷酸钠并没有进一步改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验