• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定糖尿病患者对护理的偏好:萨摩亚实施离散选择实验的方案。

Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Department of Health Services Policy and Practice, and International Health Institute, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Dec 22;18(12):e0295845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295845. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0295845
PMID:38134044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10745180/
Abstract

In Samoa, adult Type 2 diabetes prevalence has increased within the past 30 years. Patient preferences for care are factors known to influence treatment adherence and are associated with reduced disease progression and severity. However, patient preferences for diabetes care, generally, are understudied, and other patient-centered factors such as willingness-to-pay (WTP) for diabetes treatment have never been explored in this setting. Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE) are useful tools to elicit preferences and WTP for healthcare. DCEs present patients with hypothetical scenarios composed of a series of multi-alternative choice profiles made up of attributes and levels. Patients choose a profile based on which attributes and levels may be preferable for them, thereby quantifying and identifying locally relevant patient-centered preferences. This paper presents the protocol for the design, piloting, and implementation of a DCE identifying patient preferences for diabetes care, in Samoa. Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design, formative data from a literature review and semi-structured interviews with n = 20 Samoan adults living with Type 2 diabetes was used to design a Best-Best DCE instrument. Experimental design procedures were used to reduce the number of choice-sets and balance the instrument. Following pilot testing, the DCE is being administered to n = 450 Samoan adults living with diabetes, along with associated questionnaires, and anthropometrics. Subsequently, we will also be assessing longitudinally how preferences for care change over time. Data will be analyzed using progressive mixed Rank Order Logit models. The results will identify which diabetes care attributes are important to patients (p < 0.05), examine associations between participant characteristics and preference, illuminate the trade-offs participants are willing to make, and the probability of uptake, and WTP for specific attributes and levels. The results from this study will provide integral data useful for designing and adapting efficacious diabetes intervention and treatment approaches in this setting.

摘要

在萨摩亚,成年人 2 型糖尿病的患病率在过去 30 年中有所增加。患者对护理的偏好是已知会影响治疗依从性的因素,与降低疾病进展和严重程度有关。然而,一般来说,患者对糖尿病护理的偏好研究不足,其他以患者为中心的因素,如对糖尿病治疗的支付意愿 (WTP),在这种情况下从未被探讨过。离散选择实验 (DCE) 是一种有用的工具,可以引出对医疗保健的偏好和 WTP。DCE 向患者呈现由一系列多选择配置文件组成的假设场景,这些配置文件由属性和水平组成。患者根据可能对他们更有利的属性和水平选择一个配置文件,从而对本地相关的以患者为中心的偏好进行量化和识别。本文介绍了在萨摩亚设计、试点和实施 DCE 以确定患者对糖尿病护理偏好的方案。采用探索性顺序混合方法设计,从文献综述和对 20 名萨摩亚成年 2 型糖尿病患者的半结构式访谈中获取形成性数据,用于设计最佳最佳 DCE 工具。实验设计程序用于减少选择集的数量并平衡工具。试点测试后,正在向 450 名萨摩亚成年糖尿病患者发放 DCE 以及相关问卷和人体测量学数据。随后,我们还将评估随着时间的推移护理偏好如何变化。数据将使用渐进式混合秩次逻辑模型进行分析。结果将确定哪些糖尿病护理属性对患者重要 (p < 0.05),研究参与者特征与偏好之间的关联,阐明参与者愿意做出的权衡以及特定属性和水平的吸收率和 WTP。这项研究的结果将提供有用的基础数据,用于设计和调整这种情况下有效的糖尿病干预和治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e5/10745180/c2860f3ef4b3/pone.0295845.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e5/10745180/3ddc41f2eebc/pone.0295845.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e5/10745180/c2860f3ef4b3/pone.0295845.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e5/10745180/3ddc41f2eebc/pone.0295845.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71e5/10745180/c2860f3ef4b3/pone.0295845.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa.确定糖尿病患者对护理的偏好:萨摩亚实施离散选择实验的方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 22;18(12):e0295845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295845. eCollection 2023.
2
A Study of Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Western China: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.中国西部非小细胞肺癌患者治疗偏好的研究:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;9:653450. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653450. eCollection 2021.
3
What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者对耳鼻喉科医生有何期望?一项离散选择实验。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;157(4):618-624. doi: 10.1177/0194599817717662. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
4
Patient preferences for dry powder inhaler attributes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in France: a discrete choice experiment.法国哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对干粉吸入器属性的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0439-x.
5
Preferences of Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases for Primary Healthcare Facilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Wuhan, China.非传染性疾病患者对基层医疗保健设施的偏好:来自中国武汉的离散选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 4;17(11):3987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113987.
6
Capturing Adult Patient Preferences Toward Benefits and Risks of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Medications Used in Type 2 Diabetes: A Discrete Choice Experiment.捕获成年患者对 2 型糖尿病二线抗高血糖药物的获益-风险偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Feb;44(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
A Discrete Choice Experiment to Examine the Preferences of Patients With Cancer and Their Willingness to Pay for Different Types of Health Care Appointments.一项离散选择实验,用于研究癌症患者的偏好及其为不同类型医疗预约支付费用的意愿。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Mar;14(3):311-9. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0036. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
Managing Minor Ailments; The Public's Preferences for Attributes of Community Pharmacies. A Discrete Choice Experiment.管理小病;公众对社区药房属性的偏好。一项离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152257. eCollection 2016.
9
Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a discrete-choice experiment.患者对轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎一线口服治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2012;5(1):33-44. doi: 10.2165/11595390-000000000-00000.
10
Using a discrete choice experiment to elicit patients' preferences and willingness-to-pay for knee osteoarthritis treatments in Thailand.采用离散选择实验来获取泰国膝关节骨关节炎治疗的患者偏好和支付意愿。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39264-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring tuberculosis patients' preferences for AI-assisted remote health management services in China: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.探索中国结核病患者对人工智能辅助远程健康管理服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e101918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101918.
2
Equity, ethics and the promise of partnership in genomic medicine.基因组医学中的公平、伦理与伙伴关系的前景。
Nat Genet. 2025 Apr;57(4):765-766. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02131-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' Preference Between DPP4i and SGLT2i for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.2型糖尿病治疗中患者对二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的偏好:一项横断面评估
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 May 9;16:1201-1211. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S355638. eCollection 2022.
2
iSAY (incentives for South African youth): Stated preferences of young people living with HIV.iSAY(南非青年激励计划):HIV 感染者年轻人的意愿调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113333. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113333. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
Challenges and Strategies for Managing Diabetes in the Elderly in Long-Term Care Settings.
长期护理机构中老年人糖尿病管理的挑战与策略
Diabetes Spectr. 2020 Aug;33(3):236-245. doi: 10.2337/ds20-0018.
4
"Why Am I Not Taking Medications?" Barriers and Facilitators of Diabetes Medication Adherence Across Different Health Literacy Levels.“为什么我不服药?”不同健康素养水平下糖尿病药物依从性的障碍和促进因素。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2331-2342. doi: 10.1177/1049732320945296. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Views of People with Diabetes Regarding Their Experiences of the Facilitators and Barriers in Type 1 Diabetes Inpatient Care: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.糖尿病患者对1型糖尿病住院护理中促进因素和障碍体验的看法:一项解释性现象学分析。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Jul 22;10(8):120. doi: 10.3390/bs10080120.
6
Patients' perspectives on how to improve diabetes care and self-management: qualitative study.患者视角下改善糖尿病护理和自我管理的方法:定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 29;10(4):e032762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032762.
7
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Time preferences, diabetes self-management behaviours and outcomes: a systematic review.时间偏好、糖尿病自我管理行为与结局:系统综述。
Diabet Med. 2019 Nov;36(11):1336-1348. doi: 10.1111/dme.14102. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
9
The impact of personal and cultural beliefs on medication adherence of patients with chronic illnesses: a systematic review.个人和文化信仰对慢性病患者药物治疗依从性的影响:一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jul 1;13:1019-1035. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S212046. eCollection 2019.
10
Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies.实施映射:运用干预映射法制定实施策略
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158. eCollection 2019.