Suppr超能文献

法国哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对干粉吸入器属性的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Patient preferences for dry powder inhaler attributes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in France: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Creativ-Ceutical, Westblaak 92, 3012 KM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0439-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are often used in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies. Using the discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology, this study conducted in France was designed to assess patients' preferences for different attributes of DPIs.

METHODS

Attributes of DPIs were defined based on a literature review, patient focus group discussions and interviews with healthcare professionals (qualitative phase of the study). An online survey was then conducted among French patients with asthma or COPD to elicit patient preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for these attributes using the DCE methodology (quantitative phase). A fractional factorial design including three blocks of 12 choice sets was created. Each choice set comprised three alternatives: two fictitious inhalers and the patient's current inhaler. Marginal utilities were estimated using a ranked ordered logit model. Interactions between attributes and disease (asthma or COPD) were tested.

RESULTS

Six DPI attributes were defined based on the qualitative phase: ease of use/fool-proof priming; accurate and easy-to-read dose counter; dose confirmation; hygiene of the mouthpiece; flexibility of the device handling; ability to use the inhaler with breathing difficulties. Overall, 201 patients with asthma and 93 with COPD were included in the online survey. Patients with asthma placed most value on an inhaler that requires one step for dose preparation (WTP €4.83 [95% CI: €3.77-€5.90], relative to an inhaler requiring four steps) and one that could be used during episodes of breathing difficulties (WTP €4.49 [95% CI: €2.95-€6.02]). Patients with COPD placed most value on an inhaler that could be used during episodes of breathing difficulties (WTP €7.70 [95% CI: €5.65-€9.76]) and on the accuracy of the dose counter (WTP €5.87 [95% CI: €3.98-€ 7.77]).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that asthma and COPD patients would be willing to change their inhaler if they were offered the option of a new inhaler with improved characteristics and they place a high value on an inhaler with ease of use during breathing difficulty episodes.

摘要

背景

干粉吸入器(DPIs)常用于哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗。本研究在法国采用离散选择实验(DCE)方法,旨在评估患者对 DPI 不同属性的偏好。

方法

基于文献回顾、患者焦点小组讨论和与医疗保健专业人员的访谈(研究的定性阶段)定义了 DPI 的属性。然后,在法国进行了一项在线调查,使用 DCE 方法(定量阶段)调查哮喘或 COPD 患者对这些属性的偏好和支付意愿(WTP)。创建了一个包含三个 12 个选择集块的分数阶因子设计。每个选择集由三个选项组成:两种虚构的吸入器和患者当前使用的吸入器。使用有序逻辑回归模型估计边际效用。测试了属性与疾病(哮喘或 COPD)之间的相互作用。

结果

根据定性阶段确定了六个 DPI 属性:易于使用/防错启动;准确且易于阅读的剂量计数器;剂量确认;吸嘴卫生;设备处理的灵活性;能够在呼吸困难时使用吸入器。总体而言,201 名哮喘患者和 93 名 COPD 患者参加了在线调查。哮喘患者最看重需要一步剂量准备的吸入器(相对于需要四步剂量准备的吸入器,WTP 为 4.83 欧元[95%CI:3.77-5.90 欧元])和在呼吸困难发作时可以使用的吸入器(WTP 为 4.49 欧元[95%CI:2.95-6.02 欧元])。COPD 患者最看重可以在呼吸困难发作时使用的吸入器(WTP 为 7.70 欧元[95%CI:5.65-9.76 欧元])和剂量计数器的准确性(WTP 为 5.87 欧元[95%CI:3.98-7.77 欧元])。

结论

本研究表明,如果患者有机会选择具有改进特性的新型吸入器,他们愿意更换吸入器,并且非常重视在呼吸困难发作时易于使用的吸入器。

相似文献

4
Patient preference for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment inhalers: a discrete choice experiment in France.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):785-792. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1574507. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
8
Correct usage, ease of use, and preference of two dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD: analysis of five phase III, randomized trials.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 16;11:1873-80. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S109121. eCollection 2016.
10
Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Aug 5;11:1845-55. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S113870. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

2
Feedback systems in multi-dose dry powder inhalers.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023 Feb;40(1):16-21. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.117039. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Comparison of Two pMDIs in Adult Asthmatics: A Randomized Double-Blind Double-Dummy Clinical Trial.
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2022 Jan;85(1):25-36. doi: 10.4046/trd.2021.0093. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Patient. 2022 Jan;15(1):55-68. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
6
Preferences of patients with asthma or COPD for treatments in pulmonary rehabilitation.
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Apr 17;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00308-0.
9
Inhaler Devices in a Geriatric Patient Population: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Preferences.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Oct 7;14:1811-1822. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S262057. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of the value of innovation in inhalers for COPD and asthma.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2015 Sep 16;3. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v3.28760. eCollection 2015.
3
Spiromax, a New Dry Powder Inhaler: Dose Consistency under Simulated Real-World Conditions.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015 Oct;28(5):309-19. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1216. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
Evaluating the technique of using inhalation device in COPD and bronchial asthma patients.
Respir Med. 2014 Jul;108(7):992-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Preference, satisfaction and errors with two dry powder inhalers in patients with COPD.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013 Aug;10(8):1023-31. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2013.808186. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
8
COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:139-50. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S38577. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
9
Improper inhaler technique is associated with poor asthma control and frequent emergency department visits.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Mar 6;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验