• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌患者的诊断工作可以通过检查表和更清晰的方案得到改善;欧洲两个三级中心的对比研究。

Diagnostic workup for esophageal cancer patients can be improved with checklists and clearer protocols; a comparative study between two tertiary centers in Europe.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, And Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;50(2):107318. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107318. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107318
PMID:38145609
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid and complete workup of newly diagnosed esophageal cancer is vital for a timely, individual and high-quality treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to uncover potential delay, inefficiencies and non-contributing investigations in the diagnostic process in two tertiary referral centers.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients referred to or diagnosed in the Amsterdam UMC and Karolinska University Hospital between July 2020 and July 2021. Radiology, pathological assessment and multidisciplinary team meeting reports were reviewed. To assess time interval from diagnosis to treatment, dates of diagnosis, admittance to referral hospital, MDT meeting and start of treatment were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 252 esophageal cancer patients were included, 187 were treated with curative intent. Curatively treated patients had a mean age of 66 years, were predominantly male (74.9 %) with an adenocarcinoma (71.1 %). Curatively treated patients had a median time from diagnosis to referral of seven days (IQR:0-11) and of 35 days (IQR:28-45) between diagnosis and start of treatment. Main reasons for the significant (P < 0.001) differences in time between diagnosis and treatment between centers, Amsterdam UMC (39 days) vs Karolinska (27 days), were need for additional diagnostics (47.8 %) and differences in referral routine. Gastroscopy was repeated in 32.2 % of patients, mainly for further anatomical mapping.

CONCLUSION

Significant time differences between centers in the path from diagnosis to start treatment can be explained by differences in workup approach, referral routines and MDT meeting regulations. Repeat of gastroscopy can be prevented with clearer endoscopy guidelines.

摘要

背景

快速、全面的新诊断食管癌检查对于及时、个体化和高质量的治疗策略至关重要。本研究旨在揭示在两家三级转诊中心的诊断过程中潜在的延迟、低效和非贡献性检查。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 7 月期间阿姆斯特丹 UMC 和卡罗林斯卡大学医院新诊断为食管癌的所有患者。回顾了放射学、病理评估和多学科团队会议报告。为了评估从诊断到治疗的时间间隔,收集了诊断日期、转诊医院入院日期、MDT 会议日期和治疗开始日期。

结果

共纳入 252 例食管癌患者,187 例接受了根治性治疗。接受根治性治疗的患者平均年龄为 66 岁,主要为男性(74.9%),腺癌(71.1%)。根治性治疗患者从诊断到转诊的中位时间为 7 天(IQR:0-11),从诊断到治疗开始的中位时间为 35 天(IQR:28-45)。中心之间诊断和治疗之间时间差异显著(P<0.001)的主要原因是需要额外的诊断(47.8%)和转诊常规的差异。32.2%的患者重复进行了胃镜检查,主要是为了进一步进行解剖学绘图。

结论

诊断到开始治疗的路径中,不同中心之间存在显著的时间差异,可以通过不同的检查方法、转诊常规和 MDT 会议规定来解释。通过更明确的内镜指南,可以避免重复进行胃镜检查。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic workup for esophageal cancer patients can be improved with checklists and clearer protocols; a comparative study between two tertiary centers in Europe.食管癌患者的诊断工作可以通过检查表和更清晰的方案得到改善;欧洲两个三级中心的对比研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;50(2):107318. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107318. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
Incidence and oncological implication of adrenal incidentalomas in esophageal cancer patients.食管癌患者肾上腺意外瘤的发生率及其对肿瘤学的影响。
Dis Esophagus. 2023 Sep 1;36(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doad003.
3
Thyroid Incidentalomas: Incidence and Oncological Implication in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.甲状腺偶发瘤:食管癌患者中的发生率及肿瘤学意义
Dig Surg. 2023;40(6):216-224. doi: 10.1159/000534027. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省区域性照护体系中食管癌的诊断、治疗和结局的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126090. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26090.
5
The "two-week wait" referral pathway allows prompt treatment but does not improve outcome for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.“两周等待”转诊途径可实现快速治疗,但对食管癌和胃癌患者的治疗效果并无改善。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;36(10):977-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
6
Incremental value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in therapeutic decision-making of potentially curable esophageal adenocarcinoma.18F-FDG PET/CT在潜在可治愈性食管腺癌治疗决策中的增量价值
Nucl Med Commun. 2014 Aug;35(8):864-9. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000137.
7
What is the role of a specialist regional mesothelioma multidisciplinary team meeting? A service evaluation of one tertiary referral centre in the UK. Specialist 区域性间皮瘤多学科团队会议的作用是什么?英国一家三级转诊中心的服务评估。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e012092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012092.
8
The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer.多学科团队会议提高了食管癌的分期准确性和治疗选择。
Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(6):496-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00629.x.
9
Impact of multidisciplinary tumor board discussion on palliation of patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a population-based study.多学科肿瘤委员会讨论对食管或胃食管交界处癌症患者缓解症状的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Apr;59(4):410-416. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1725240. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Evaluating the role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in multi-disciplinary team recommendations for oesophago-gastric cancer.评估氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描在多学科团队对食管胃结合部癌建议中的作用。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 17;109(6):1445-50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.478. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-rater variability in multidisciplinary team meetings of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer on staging, resectability and treatment recommendation: national retrospective multicentre study.多学科团队会议中食管和食管胃交界部癌在分期、可切除性及治疗建议方面的评分者间差异:全国性回顾性多中心研究
BJS Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae140.