Laboratório de Bacteriologia Veterinária (LaBacVet), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Laboratório de Bacteriologia Veterinária (LaBacVet), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Anal Biochem. 2024 Apr;687:115449. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115449. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
Determining bacterial and fungal communities from low-biomass samples remains a challenge for high-throughput sequencing. Due to the low microbial load and host contamination, some sites, including the female upper reproductive tract and the lower respiratory tract, were even considered sterile until recent years. Despite efforts to improve sampling and DNA isolation protocols, some samples provide insufficient microbial DNA input for library preparation and sequencing. Herein, we propose an alternative amplicon-PCR protocol to be used in bacterial and fungal sequencing in low-biomass samples, targeting 16S-rDNA and the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), respectively. Similar to a nested-PCR, we performed two sequential PCR reactions to maximise the target amplicon. We compared metagenomic results from the original Illumina protocol (Protocol 1 - P1) and the alternative one (Protocol 2 - P2), using a mock community and clinical samples with different microbial loads. Our findings showed no significant differences in data generated by P1 and P2, indicating that the second amplification round does not bias the microbiota diversity rates. Thus, the alternative protocol can be applied for low-biomass samples when the original protocol results in spurious output, preventing library preparation and sequencing.
从低生物量样本中确定细菌和真菌群落仍然是高通量测序的一个挑战。由于微生物负荷低和宿主污染,一些部位,包括女性上生殖道和下呼吸道,直到近年来才被认为是无菌的。尽管努力改进采样和 DNA 分离方案,但有些样本提供的微生物 DNA 不足以进行文库制备和测序。在此,我们提出了一种替代的扩增子-PCR 方案,用于在低生物量样本中进行细菌和真菌测序,分别针对 16S-rDNA 和内部转录间隔区(ITS)。与巢式 PCR 类似,我们进行了两个连续的 PCR 反应,以最大限度地扩增目标片段。我们使用模拟群落和具有不同微生物负荷的临床样本比较了原始 Illumina 方案(方案 1-P1)和替代方案(方案 2-P2)的宏基因组结果。我们的研究结果表明,P1 和 P2 生成的数据没有显著差异,这表明第二轮扩增不会偏向微生物多样性率。因此,当原始方案导致虚假输出时,替代方案可用于低生物量样本,从而防止文库制备和测序。