Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.GRANADA, 18012, Granada, Spain.
Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Cuesta del Observatorio, 4. 18011, Granada, Spain.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):6186-6199. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31682-3. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
The etiology of prostate cancer is not fully elucidated. Among environmental risk factors, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) deserve special mention, as they alter metabolic pathways involved in hormone-dependent cancers. Epidemiological evidence assessing the carcinogenicity of EDCs is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between exposure to parabens and benzophenones and prostate cancer risk. We conducted a case-cohort study nested within the EPIC-Spain prospective multi-center cohort. Study population comprised 1,838 sub-cohort participants and 467 non-sub-cohort prostate cancer cases. Serum concentrations of four parabens and two benzophenones were assessed at recruitment. Covariates included age, physical activity, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, educational level and diabetes. Borgan II weighted Cox proportional hazard models stratified by study center were applied. Median follow-up time was 18.6 years (range = 1.0-21.7 years). Most sub-cohort participants reached primary education at most (65.5%), were overweight (57.7%) and had a low level of physical activity (51.3%). Detection percentages varied widely, being lowest for butyl-paraben (11.3%) and highest for methyl-paraben (80.7%), which also showed the highest geometric mean (0.95 ng/ml). Cases showed significantly higher concentrations of methyl-paraben (p = 0.041) and propyl-paraben (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, methyl-paraben - log-transformed (HR = 1.07; 95%CI = 1.01-1.12) and categorized into tertiles (HR = 1.60 for T3; 95%CI = 1.16-2.20) -, butyl-paraben - linear (HR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.14-1.23) and log-transformed (HR = 1.17; 95%CI = 1.01-1.35) - and total parabens - log-transformed (HR = 1.09; 95%CI = 1.02-1.17) and categorized into tertiles (HR = 1.62 for T3; 95%CI = 1.10-2.40) - were associated with an increased prostate cancer risk. In this study, higher concentrations of methyl-, butyl-, and total parabens were positively associated with prostate cancer risk. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
前列腺癌的病因尚未完全阐明。在环境危险因素中,内分泌干扰化学物质(EDCs)值得特别提及,因为它们改变了与激素依赖性癌症有关的代谢途径。评估 EDC 致癌性的流行病学证据很少。本研究旨在分析对羟基苯甲酸酯和二苯甲酮暴露与前列腺癌风险之间的关系。我们在 EPIC-Spain 前瞻性多中心队列中进行了巢式病例对照研究。研究人群包括 1838 名亚队列参与者和 467 名非亚队列前列腺癌病例。在招募时评估了四种对羟基苯甲酸酯和两种二苯甲酮的血清浓度。协变量包括年龄、体力活动、吸烟、饮酒、体重指数、教育水平和糖尿病。应用按研究中心分层的 Borgan II 加权 Cox 比例风险模型。中位随访时间为 18.6 年(范围 1.0-21.7 年)。大多数亚队列参与者最多达到小学教育(65.5%),超重(57.7%),体力活动水平低(51.3%)。检测百分比差异很大,最低的是丁基对羟基苯甲酸酯(11.3%),最高的是甲基对羟基苯甲酸酯(80.7%),其几何平均值也最高(0.95ng/ml)。病例的甲基对羟基苯甲酸酯(p=0.041)和丙基对羟基苯甲酸酯(p<0.001)浓度明显更高。在多变量分析中,甲基对羟基苯甲酸酯 - 对数转换(HR=1.07;95%CI=1.01-1.12)和分为三分位数(T3 的 HR=1.60;95%CI=1.16-2.20)-,丁基对羟基苯甲酸酯 - 线性(HR=1.19;95%CI=1.14-1.23)和对数转换(HR=1.17;95%CI=1.01-1.35)-和总对羟基苯甲酸酯 - 对数转换(HR=1.09;95%CI=1.02-1.17)和分为三分位数(T3 的 HR=1.62;95%CI=1.10-2.40)-与前列腺癌风险增加相关。在这项研究中,较高浓度的甲基、丁基和总对羟基苯甲酸酯与前列腺癌风险呈正相关。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。