Suppr超能文献

新型催眠药物对认知的影响:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

Effects of new hypnotic drugs on cognition: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Mengzhen, Liu Rujia, Tang Jiyou, Tang Shi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, PR China.

Yuhuangding Hospital, No, 20, Yuhuangding East Road, Zhifu District, Yantai, Shandong, PR China.

出版信息

Sleep Med X. 2023 Nov 19;6:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.sleepx.2023.100094. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to different effects. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the cognitive impairment caused by different sleeping pills to provide a theoretical basis for guiding clinicians in the selection of medication regimens.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether various different doses (low, medium and high) of anti-insomnia drugs, such as the dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), zopiclone, eszopiclone and zolpidem, induce cognitive impairment.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to September 20th, 2022 for keywords in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem on sleep and cognitive function. The primary outcomes were indicators related to cognitive characteristics, including scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and daytime alertness. The secondary outcomes were the indicators associated with sleep and adverse events. Continuous variables were expressed as the standard mean difference (SMD). Data were obtained through GetData 2.26 and analyzed by Stata v.15.0.

RESULTS

A total of 8702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Eszopiclone significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 3.00, 95 % CI: 1.86 to 4.13) compared with the placebo, and eszopiclone significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.65 to 6.77; SMD = 3.95, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 6.51; SMD = 3.26, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.15; and SMD = 3.23, 95 % CI: 0.34 to 6.11) compared with zolpidem, zolpidem, DORA, and eszopiclone, respectively. Compared with the placebo, zopiclone, zolpidem, and eszopiclone, DORA significantly increased the TST (SMD = 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.11 to 3.67; SMD = 6.00, 95 % CI: 2.73 to 9.27; SMD = 1.89, 95 % CI: 0.90 to 2.88; and SMD = 1.70, 95 % CI: 0.42 to 2.99, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it was highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem had a more pronounced effect on sleep maintenance, this drug is better for short-term use. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep, but their cognitive effects have yet to be verified.

摘要

背景

失眠是一种常见疾病,各类安眠药对认知功能的影响存在争议,尤其是不同剂量会导致不同效果。因此,有必要评估不同安眠药引起的认知损害,为指导临床医生选择用药方案提供理论依据。

目的

评估不同剂量(低、中、高)的抗失眠药物,如双食欲素受体拮抗剂(DORA)、佐匹克隆、艾司佐匹克隆和唑吡坦,是否会引起认知损害。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术数据库,从建库至2022年9月20日,查找随机对照试验(RCT)中评估DORA、艾司佐匹克隆、佐匹克隆和唑吡坦对睡眠及认知功能治疗效果的关键词。主要结局是与认知特征相关的指标,包括数字符号替换测验(DSST)得分和日间警觉性。次要结局是与睡眠及不良事件相关的指标。连续变量以标准均数差(SMD)表示。数据通过GetData 2.26获取,并采用Stata v.15.0进行分析。

结果

29项研究共纳入8702名受试者。与安慰剂相比,艾司佐匹克隆显著提高了日间警觉性得分(SMD = 3.00,95%CI:1.86至4.13);与唑吡坦、佐匹克隆、DORA和艾司佐匹克隆相比,艾司佐匹克隆分别显著提高了日间警觉性得分(SMD = 4.21,95%CI:1.65至6.77;SMD = 3.95,95%CI:1.38至6.51;SMD = 3.26,95%CI:0.38至6.15;SMD = 3.23,95%CI:0.34至6.11)。与安慰剂、佐匹克隆、唑吡坦和艾司佐匹克隆相比,DORA显著增加了总睡眠时间(TST)(SMD分别为2.39,95%CI:1.11至3.67;SMD = 6.00,95%CI:2.73至9.27;SMD = 1.89,95%CI:0.90至2.88;SMD = 1.70,95%CI:0.42至2.99)。

结论

我们推荐DORA作为失眠的最佳干预药物,因为它在诱导和维持睡眠方面高效且不损害认知。虽然唑吡坦对睡眠维持有更显著效果,但该药更适合短期使用。艾司佐匹克隆和佐匹克隆改善了睡眠,但其对认知的影响尚待验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/390d/10749902/e7b3f3bb16c6/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验