Aksu Feyza, Kartufan Ferda, Köner Özge, Görmez Ayşegül, Keleş Elif Çiğdem
Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, İstanbul, Turkey.
İstinye University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2023 Dec 27;51(6):470-476. doi: 10.4274/TJAR.2023.231277.
During neuraxial anaesthesia, correct patient positioning is key for increased block success and (patient) comfort. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the lateral fetal decubitus (LFD) position with the sitting fetal lotus (SFL) regarding interspinous distance, transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles measured with ultrasonography, and patient comfort.
Fifty adult participants who could sit cross-legged and had no lumbar anomalies were included in our prospective study. In both SFL and LFD positions, measurements were performed with ultrasonography; in the axial plane, interspinous distance at the level of L4-L5, in the sagittal plan, with the probe slightly tilted, subcutaneous tissue-spinous process depth, and transverse diameters of paravertebral muscles were measured. Stretcher, waist position, and abdominal comfort were scored on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 7 (perfect) with a verbal numeric satisfaction scale.
Interspinous distance was significantly larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two positions ( > 0.05) regarding patient comfort. Paravertebral muscle diameters were significantly broader in the SFL position than in the LFD position. The diameter of the left paravertebral muscle in the SFL position (45.8±8.8 mm) was larger than that in the LFD position (43±7.8 mm; < 0.001). The diameter of the right paravertebral muscle in the SFL position was (47±9 mm) larger than that in the LFD position (43.4±7.6 mm; < 0.001).
Although there was no difference regarding the comfort between the two positions, the interspinous distance was larger in the SFL position than in the LFD position.
在椎管内麻醉期间,正确的患者体位是提高阻滞成功率和(患者)舒适度的关键。这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较侧卧位胎儿体位(LFD)和坐位胎儿莲花体位(SFL)在棘突间距离、超声测量的椎旁肌横径以及患者舒适度方面的差异。
50名能够盘腿而坐且无腰椎异常的成年参与者纳入我们的前瞻性研究。在SFL和LFD体位下,均采用超声进行测量;在轴位平面上,测量L4-L5水平的棘突间距离,在矢状面,探头稍微倾斜,测量皮下组织-棘突深度以及椎旁肌的横径。使用言语数字满意度量表,对担架、腰部位置和腹部舒适度进行评分,范围为1(非常差)至7(完美)。
SFL体位的棘突间距离显著大于LFD体位(<0.05)。在患者舒适度方面,两个体位之间无显著差异(>0.05)。SFL体位的椎旁肌直径显著宽于LFD体位。SFL体位下左侧椎旁肌直径(45.8±8.8mm)大于LFD体位下的直径(43±7.8mm;<0.001)。SFL体位下右侧椎旁肌直径(47±9mm)大于LFD体位下的直径(43.4±7.6mm;<0.001)。
尽管两个体位在舒适度方面无差异,但SFL体位的棘突间距离大于LFD体位。