Roman Tatiana, Cournault Bérangère, Teyagirwa Prudence Felix, Erkel Arnaud, Levratto Fabio, Jean Richelme, Romain Ceinos, Jmal Hamdi, Etienne Olivier
DDS, Dental School of Medicine, University of Strasbourg, France; Inserm U1121, Strasbourg, France.
DDS, Dental School of Medicine, University of Strasbourg, France.
Dent Mater. 2024 Feb;40(2):370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.015. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
This study aimed first to compare the shear bond strength between zirconia samples luted to enamel with a 10-MDP- containing resin cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray, Japan) and those luted with a resin cement using a separated 10-MDP monomer-containing bottle (Panavia V5, Kuraray, Japan). The second objective was to evaluate the bond stability after 150 days of aging in water, between enamel and zirconia ceramic surface enhanced with a glass-ceramic coating.
80 specimens composed of ceramic cylinders and enamel disks were obtained, within eight experimental groups (n = 10). 60 zirconia cylinders (Katana STML zirconia, Kuraray, Japan) were assigned to 3 groups according to their surface treatment: milled/sintered surface (ZRCT), tribochemical silica-coating (Cojet™ Sand, 3 M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) (ZRTC), and glass-ceramic coating (IPS e.max Zirpress) (ZRZP). 20 cylinders of lithium disilicate had a milled surface (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (ECAD). The cylinders of each group were further divided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: Panavia F2.0 (-PF) and Panavia V5 (-PV). All specimens were stored in distilled water for 150 days before shear bond strength (SBS) tests. The fracture mode was analyzed, and data were statistically computed (two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, p < 0.05, SPSS, IBM, v26).
The ECAD-PF group recorded the highest SBS values (31.75 ± 2.2), and the ZRCT-PF group recorded the lowest values (5.59 ± 1.1). The two-way ANOVA test showed that ceramic surface treatment had a statistically significant effect on SBS (F (3,72) = 38.95, p < 0.001) while the type of ARC did not (F (1,72) = 2.40, p = 0.126). Tukey's post hoc test revealed no statistical difference between the ZRZP and the ZRTC or ECAD groups.
Within the limitations of this study, the PV resin achieved similar shear bond strength results between tribocoated zirconia and enamel compared to the one for glass-ceramic and enamel. Furthermore, a long-term durable bond, similar to the glass-ceramic one, was achieved with the heat pressed ceramic coated specimens. Thus, this new surface treatment could be recommended for anterior cantilever bridges for its fracture resistance and bonding ability.
本研究的首要目的是比较使用含10-MDP的树脂水门汀(Panavia F2.0,日本可乐丽公司)粘结至牙釉质的氧化锆样本与使用装有单独含10-MDP单体瓶的树脂水门汀(Panavia V5,日本可乐丽公司)粘结的氧化锆样本之间的剪切粘结强度。第二个目的是评估在水中老化150天后,玻璃陶瓷涂层增强的牙釉质与氧化锆陶瓷表面之间的粘结稳定性。
获取了由陶瓷圆柱体和牙釉质圆盘组成的80个标本,分为八个实验组(n = 10)。60个氧化锆圆柱体(Katana STML氧化锆,日本可乐丽公司)根据其表面处理分为3组:研磨/烧结表面(ZRCT)、摩擦化学硅涂层(Cojet™ Sand,德国3M ESPE公司,塞费尔德)(ZRTC)和玻璃陶瓷涂层(IPS e.max Zirpress)(ZRZP)。20个二硅酸锂圆柱体有研磨表面(IPS e.max CAD,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司,列支敦士登公国沙恩)(ECAD)。每组圆柱体根据所用树脂水门汀进一步分为两个亚组:Panavia F2.0(-PF)和Panavia V5(-PV)。在进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试前,所有标本在蒸馏水中储存150天。分析断裂模式,并对数据进行统计学计算(双向方差分析、事后Tukey检验,p < 0.05,SPSS,IBM,v26)。
ECAD-PF组记录到最高的SBS值(31.75 ± 2.2),ZRCT-PF组记录到最低值(5.59 ± 1.1)。双向方差分析表明,陶瓷表面处理对SBS有统计学显著影响(F(3,72) = 38.95,p < 0.001),而树脂水门汀类型没有(F(1,72) = 2.40,p = 0.126)。Tukey事后检验显示ZRZP组与ZRTC组或ECAD组之间无统计学差异。
在本研究的局限性内,与玻璃陶瓷和牙釉质之间相比,PV树脂在摩擦涂层氧化锆和牙釉质之间获得了相似的剪切粘结强度结果。此外,热压陶瓷涂层标本实现了与玻璃陶瓷类似的长期持久粘结。因此,这种新的表面处理因其抗断裂性和粘结能力,可推荐用于前牙悬臂桥。