• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合食品数据引用标准的制定:营养研究文献中一个惊人的空白。

Development of a Comprehensive Food Data Citation Standard: A Surprising Gap in the Nutrition Research Literature.

作者信息

Forester Shavawn, Jennings-Dobbs Emily, Burton-Freeman Britt

机构信息

Nutrient Institute, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization, Reno, NV, United States.

Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Nov 24;8(1):102048. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102048. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102048
PMID:38156342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10751823/
Abstract

Currently, there is no standard for the citation of food composition data. This leads to the questions: how are food and nutrient data cited in research papers, and are they presented in a way that allows studies to be reproduced? To answer these questions, we performed a review of the literature and quantified the accuracy and completeness of data citations from publications (January to December 2020) in the top 5 nutrition journals as ranked by the Scimago Journal Rankings. We then performed a review of citation guidelines currently in place in other disciplines. Similar to the requirement of completing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist for systematic reviews, we have developed a comprehensive data citation checklist, the Comprehensive Food Data Citation (CFDC) checklist. The CFDC checklist was developed through a benchmarking assessment against established data citation standards. Its purpose is to establish a standardized, best-practice approach for reporting food composition data. The CFDC checklist has been designed to cater to both publishers and authors, ensuring consistency and accuracy in food composition data reporting. The CFDC checklist is also available as an interactive citation generator to facilitate the adoption of consistent and comprehensive citation of food composition data and is available at https://www.nutrientinstitute.org/cfdc. Despite general agreement that accurate data citation is paramount, this is the first citation standard specifically developed to capture food composition data. Because food composition data are the foundation of nutrition research, our proposed guidelines aim to provide the field with a much-needed foundation for acknowledging and sharing data in a way that fosters reproducibility.

摘要

目前,食品成分数据的引用尚无标准。这引发了以下问题:研究论文中如何引用食品和营养数据,以及这些数据的呈现方式是否能让研究得以重现?为回答这些问题,我们对文献进行了综述,并对科学期刊排名(Scimago Journal Rankings)评选出的前5大营养期刊2020年1月至12月发表的论文中的数据引用准确性和完整性进行了量化。然后,我们对其他学科现行的引用指南进行了综述。与系统评价需完成系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目清单的要求类似,我们制定了一份全面的数据引用清单,即综合食品数据引用(CFDC)清单。CFDC清单是通过对照既定的数据引用标准进行基准评估而制定的。其目的是建立一种标准化的最佳实践方法来报告食品成分数据。CFDC清单的设计兼顾了出版商和作者的需求,确保食品成分数据报告的一致性和准确性。CFDC清单还可作为交互式引用生成器使用,以促进对食品成分数据进行一致且全面的引用,可在https://www.nutrientinstitute.org/cfdc获取。尽管普遍认为准确的数据引用至关重要,但这是首个专门为获取食品成分数据而制定的引用标准。由于食品成分数据是营养研究的基础,我们提出的指南旨在为该领域提供一个急需的基础,以便以促进可重复性的方式认可和共享数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f391/10751823/7906e640a836/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f391/10751823/5e0f0c415b60/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f391/10751823/7906e640a836/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f391/10751823/5e0f0c415b60/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f391/10751823/7906e640a836/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Comprehensive Food Data Citation Standard: A Surprising Gap in the Nutrition Research Literature.综合食品数据引用标准的制定:营养研究文献中一个惊人的空白。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Nov 24;8(1):102048. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102048. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.荟萃分析:俄罗斯出版物存在的问题。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S89-90. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150702.
6
Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.OCRA 方法评估上肢生物力学过载风险的科学基础,作为 ISO 生物力学风险因素标准中的首选方法。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):436-438. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3746.
7
Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?发表在高影响力放射学杂志上的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告质量与完整性是否与引用率相关?
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0119892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119892. eCollection 2015.
8
Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.护理期刊发表的范围综述的特征、方法学和报告质量:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jul;55(4):874-885. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12861. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
10
Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?系统评价和荟萃分析中的引文经典:谁写了前 100 篇被引频次最高的文章?
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e78517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078517. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspective: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Data Quality in Nutrient Databases.观点:营养数据库中数据质量的综合评价
Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):379-391. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology.评估临床前癌症生物学可重复性面临的挑战。
Elife. 2021 Dec 7;10:e67995. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67995.
3
The Effect of Replications on Citation Patterns: Evidence From a Large-Scale Reproducibility Project.重复对引文模式的影响:来自大规模可重复性项目的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Oct;32(10):1537-1548. doi: 10.1177/09567976211005767. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
4
A guide for authors and readers of the American Society for Nutrition Journals on the proper use of P values and strategies that promote transparency and improve research reproducibility.美国营养学会期刊作者和读者使用 P 值指南以及提高透明度和改善研究可重复性的策略。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Oct 4;114(4):1280-1285. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab223.
5
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
6
Checklists work to improve science.清单有助于改进科学。
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7701):273-274. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04590-7.
7
A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers.科学出版商的数据引用路线图。
Sci Data. 2018 Nov 20;5:180259. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.259.
8
Embracing Transparency Through Data Sharing.通过数据共享实现透明度。
Int J Toxicol. 2018 Nov/Dec;37(6):466-471. doi: 10.1177/1091581818803880. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.评价系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明及其扩展的采用和影响:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.
10
The Challenge of Reproducibility and Accuracy in Nutrition Research: Resources and Pitfalls.营养研究中可重复性和准确性的挑战:资源与陷阱
Adv Nutr. 2016 Mar 15;7(2):383-9. doi: 10.3945/an.115.010595. Print 2016 Mar.