Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;53(6):482-495. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.12.006. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
Bone scans, reflecting blood flow and metabolic activity in a region of interest, are frequently used to evaluate mandibular growth disorders. Increased uptake is a non-specific finding and can occur as a result of multiple causes. The correlation between radioactive tracer uptake and growth activity has not been consistently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of planar skeletal scintigraphy (SS), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and SPECT with computed tomography (CT) images (SPECT/CT) in detecting abnormal mandibular growth activity compared to clinical and radiographic/tomographic methods (reference standard) and histologic findings. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for planar SS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. Compared to the reference standard, SPECT/CT had the best diagnostic accuracy (76.5% sensitivity, 90.4% specificity, 83.2% accuracy), followed by planar SS (81.8% sensitivity, 84.5% specificity, 83.0% accuracy) and SPECT (77.7% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, 74.5% accuracy). The results of this study indicate that SPECT/CT has the best clinical correlation, but the certainty of the evidence is low. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between the three index tests were not clinically significant. The three tests can be useful, with only a small difference in their diagnostic value. Histopathology was found not to be satisfactory as a reference standard.
骨扫描反映了感兴趣区域的血流和代谢活性,常用于评估下颌生长障碍。摄取增加是非特异性发现,可能由多种原因引起。放射性示踪剂摄取与生长活性之间的相关性尚未得到一致证明。本研究旨在评估平面骨骼闪烁扫描(SS)、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和 SPECT 与计算机断层扫描(CT)图像(SPECT/CT)在检测异常下颌生长活动方面的准确性,与临床和影像学/断层扫描方法(参考标准)和组织学发现进行比较。根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统评价。计算了平面 SS、SPECT 和 SPECT/CT 的敏感性、特异性和准确性。与参考标准相比,SPECT/CT 具有最佳的诊断准确性(76.5%的敏感性、90.4%的特异性、83.2%的准确性),其次是平面 SS(81.8%的敏感性、84.5%的特异性、83.0%的准确性)和 SPECT(77.7%的敏感性、72.4%的特异性、74.5%的准确性)。本研究结果表明,SPECT/CT 具有最佳的临床相关性,但证据确定性较低。三种指标测试之间的敏感性和特异性差异在临床上无显著意义。这三种测试都可能有用,它们的诊断价值只有微小差异。组织病理学被发现作为参考标准并不令人满意。