Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Nic Waals Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Norway.
Autism. 2024 Aug;28(8):2105-2119. doi: 10.1177/13623613231219306. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
Using questionnaires in research relies on the expectation that they measure the same things across different groups of individuals. If this is not true, then interpretations of results can be misleading when researchers compare responses across different groups of individuals or use in it a group that differs from that in which the questionnaire was developed. For the questionnaire we investigated, the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), we found that parents of boys and girls responded to questionnaire items in largely the same way but that the SCQ measured traits and behaviors slightly differently depending on whether the children had autism. Based on these results, we concluded that researchers using this questionnaire should carefully consider these differences when deciding how to interpret findings. SCQ scores as a reflection of "autism-associated traits" in samples that are mostly or entirely made up of individuals without an autism diagnosis may be misleading and we encourage a more precise interpretation of scores as a broader indication of social-communicative and behavioral traits.
在研究中使用问卷依赖于这样一种期望,即它们在不同的个体群体中测量相同的东西。如果这不是真的,那么当研究人员在不同的个体群体之间比较反应时,或者在与问卷开发群体不同的群体中使用时,对结果的解释可能会产生误导。对于我们研究的问卷,即社会沟通问卷(SCQ),我们发现男孩和女孩的父母以大致相同的方式回答问卷项目,但 SCQ 根据孩子是否患有自闭症,以略有不同的方式测量特征和行为。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,使用该问卷的研究人员在决定如何解释发现时,应仔细考虑这些差异。在主要或完全由没有自闭症诊断的个体组成的样本中,SCQ 分数作为“自闭症相关特征”的反映可能会产生误导,我们鼓励更精确地解释分数,作为社交沟通和行为特征的更广泛指标。