Photovoltaic Reliability Laboratory, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA.
EPRI, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Waste Manag. 2024 Feb 15;174:646-665. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.12.034. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
Environmental management of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules is attracting attention as a growing number of field-operated PV modules approach end of life (EoL). PV modules may contain small amounts of toxic metals, and the procedures for assessing and regulating the toxic metal content and release of such materials at EoL differ widely across nations. This paper provides an overview of the metal composition of PV modules and common procedures for toxicity assessment through extensive research and review of technical literature and legislative documents. This review focuses on three primary aspects: first, it explores the distribution of toxic elements within current and emerging PV module designs, with a specific focus on obtaining representative samples for proportional toxicity testing within different module laminate areas. Second, it examines a sampling standard and the diverse toxicity testing methods and regulations employed in various regions, encompassing standards like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test Method 1311 (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, TCLP) in the U.S., Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) in Europe, and the Waste Extraction Test (WET) in California. Third, the review examines the sources of variability in toxicity testing outcomes, including techniques for securing homogeneous samples from non-uniform PV modules, selecting particle sizes representative of landfill conditions in extracted samples, determining appropriate leachate characteristics such as leaching agents and pH levels, and considering factors like test duration and temperatures. In summary, this review summarizes relevant regulations and offers a comprehensive overview of the strengths and limitations associated with several toxicity assessment procedures currently in practice.
随着越来越多的现场运行光伏 (PV) 模块接近使用寿命结束 (EoL),光伏模块的环境管理正受到关注。PV 模块可能含有少量有毒金属,评估和监管此类材料在 EoL 时的有毒金属含量和释放的程序在各国之间差异很大。本文通过广泛研究和审查技术文献和立法文件,概述了 PV 模块的金属成分和常见的毒性评估程序。本综述重点关注三个主要方面:首先,它探讨了当前和新兴的 PV 模块设计中有毒元素的分布,特别关注在不同模块层压板区域内获得代表性样品进行比例毒性测试。其次,它检查了采样标准以及不同地区使用的各种毒性测试方法和法规,包括美国环境保护署 (EPA) 的测试方法 1311(毒性特征浸出程序,TCLP)、欧洲的有害物质限制 (RoHS) 和加利福尼亚的废物提取测试 (WET) 等标准。第三,综述检查了毒性测试结果的可变性来源,包括从非均匀 PV 模块中获取均匀样品的技术、选择具有代表性的提取样品中填埋条件的颗粒大小、确定合适的浸出特性,如浸出剂和 pH 值,以及考虑测试持续时间和温度等因素。总之,本综述总结了相关法规,并全面概述了目前实践中几种毒性评估程序的优缺点。