• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有炫耀性消费的游戏内物品的最优策略:是否提供打磨版本?

Optimal strategy of in-game items with conspicuous consumption: whether to provide the grinding version?

作者信息

Luo Feng, Chen Jiaqi, Xu Tiantong

机构信息

Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1259319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259319. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259319
PMID:38162964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10756060/
Abstract

In the virtual world, whether or not to spend money on in-game items distinguishes paying players from non-paying players. Due to the existence of conspicuous psychology, paying players will greatly increase their conspicuous utility after purchasing an item in addition to the utility of the item itself. In this case, whether providing different versions of items can bring greater revenue to the game company is a question worth investigating. In this study, two analytical models considering conspicuous intensity are developed to compare the optimal pricing strategy of the game company providing the single-version item or dual-version items. The single-version item can only be purchased, while a relatively low-quality version that can be obtained by grinding is provided in the dual-version strategy. Grinding means using time in games to get items instead of spending in games. The results suggest that it is more profitable for companies to offer dual-version items when conspicuous intensity is strong. Game companies can also adjust the time needed to acquire the grinding version item and the quality gap between the two versions to achieve greater revenue. The research contributes to providing a theoretical basis and decision support for game companies to decide whether to provide different versions of in-game items.

摘要

在虚拟世界中,是否在游戏内物品上花钱区分了付费玩家和非付费玩家。由于存在炫耀心理,付费玩家购买物品后,除了物品本身的效用外,其炫耀效用会大幅增加。在这种情况下,提供不同版本的物品是否能给游戏公司带来更高收益是一个值得研究的问题。在本研究中,开发了两个考虑炫耀强度的分析模型,以比较游戏公司提供单版本物品或双版本物品时的最优定价策略。单版本物品只能购买,而双版本策略中提供了一个可以通过刷取获得的质量相对较低的版本。刷取是指在游戏中花费时间来获取物品而不是在游戏中花钱。结果表明,当炫耀强度较强时,公司提供双版本物品更有利可图。游戏公司还可以调整获取刷取版本物品所需的时间以及两个版本之间的质量差距,以实现更高的收益。该研究有助于为游戏公司决定是否提供不同版本的游戏内物品提供理论依据和决策支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/ce77a0442513/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/b29cc9c1103d/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/ec838bef9cd6/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/8c24e88e7348/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/98c768645a98/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/4f6133357bc1/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/ce77a0442513/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/b29cc9c1103d/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/ec838bef9cd6/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/8c24e88e7348/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/98c768645a98/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/4f6133357bc1/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9355/10756060/ce77a0442513/fpsyg-14-1259319-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal strategy of in-game items with conspicuous consumption: whether to provide the grinding version?具有炫耀性消费的游戏内物品的最优策略:是否提供打磨版本?
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1259319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259319. eCollection 2023.
2
Problem gamblers spend less money when loot boxes are removed from a game: a before and after study of .当开箱玩法从游戏中移除后,问题赌徒的消费减少:一项前后对照研究 。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,句末“of”后面应该还有具体内容)
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 29;7:e7700. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7700. eCollection 2019.
3
Who Pays to Play Freemium Games? The Profiles and Motivations of Players Who Make Purchases Within Social Casino Games.谁为免费增值游戏付费?社交赌场游戏中进行购买的玩家概况与动机。
J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):221-30. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.031. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
The Mediating Effect of Psychological Ownership on the Relationship between Value Co-Creation and the In-App Purchasing Intention of Mobile Games Players.心理所有权在价值共创与手机游戏玩家内购意愿关系中的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;13(3):205. doi: 10.3390/bs13030205.
5
A Game Theoretic Analysis of Competition Between Vaccine and Drug Companies during Disease Contraction and Recovery.疾病收缩和恢复期间疫苗和制药公司竞争的博弈论分析
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):571-586. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211053563. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
Fortnite microtransaction spending was associated with peers' purchasing behaviors but not gaming disorder symptoms.《堡垒之夜》微交易支出与同伴的购买行为有关,但与游戏障碍症状无关。
Addict Behav. 2020 May;104:106311. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106311. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
7
Development and Reliability Evaluation of the Movement Rating Instrument for Virtual Reality Video Game Play.虚拟现实视频游戏运动评估工具的开发与可靠性评估。
JMIR Serious Games. 2016 Jun 1;4(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/games.5528.
8
Virtual Reality Games and the Role of Body Involvement in Enhancing Positive Emotions and Decreasing Anxiety: Within-Subjects Pilot Study.虚拟现实游戏以及身体参与在增强积极情绪和减轻焦虑方面的作用:受试者内试点研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Jun 17;8(2):e15635. doi: 10.2196/15635.
9
Guidelines, editors, pharma and the biological paradigm shift.指南、编辑、制药行业与生物学范式转变
Mens Sana Monogr. 2007 Jan;5(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.32176.
10
Spending Money in Free-to-Play Games: Sociodemographic Characteristics, Motives, Impulsivity and Internet Gaming Disorder Specificities.免费玩游戏的消费:社会人口学特征、动机、冲动性和网络游戏障碍的特殊性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15709. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315709.

本文引用的文献

1
The link between self-uncertainty and conspicuous consumption: Tolerance of uncertainty as a moderator.自我不确定性与炫耀性消费之间的联系:不确定性容忍度作为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1066938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066938. eCollection 2022.
2
Narcissism and conspicuous consumption.自恋与炫耀性消费。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Aug;46:101322. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101322. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
Conspicuous Consumption in Emerging Markets: The Case of Starbucks in Colombia as a Global and Sustainable Brand.
新兴市场中的炫耀性消费:以哥伦比亚的星巴克为例,探讨其作为全球可持续品牌的情况。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 19;12:662950. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662950. eCollection 2021.
4
Implications of government subsidy on the vaccine product R&D when the buyer is risk averse.当购买者规避风险时政府补贴对疫苗产品研发的影响。
Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2021 Feb;146:102220. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102220. Epub 2021 Jan 17.